Prisoners of war: “MASH” (1970)

Standard

Major Margaret “Hot Lips” Houlihan:
(Objecting to a wounded North Korean soldier in the O.R.)
That man is a prisoner of war, doctor!

Captain “Trapper” John McIntyre:
So are you, sweetheart, but you don’t know it.

By Scott Ross

After you’ve read enough books about movies and interviews with people who make or star in them and seen enough “making of” home-video documentaries, certain essential truisms become manifest, and make sorting things out a little easier. One lesson I’ve learned is that nothing Dustin Hoffman has ever said about a movie is be believed. (I’m not saying he’s a liar. I’m sure he believes every word he says.) Another is that Orson Welles, like Truman Capote, liked a good story better than reality. And yet another is that nearly everything Robert Altman had to say about MASH bears about as much relationship to reality as the contents of the Warren Report.*

One example, at random: Sally Kellerman’s famous shower scene. Gary Burghoff, who played “Radar” O’Reilly in the movie as well as the subsequent television series, has always said that to make her feel less self-conscious he jokingly proposed that everyone on the camera side in her line of sight strip too. Kellerman later said that when the tent flap raised up she saw Burghoff standing naked next to the camera, which the actor confirmed. But to hear Altman tell it on the MASH DVD commentary, it was his idea, and both he and Burghoff were nude. It’s a minor incident, I know, but after hearing Altman claim for two hours that everything that worked in MASH was his and everything he felt did not was due to someone else it was a blessed relief to go directly to The Godfather commentary track and hear Francis Ford Coppola giving credit to his cinematographer, his actors, his assistants and anyone else who contributed a line or a bit of business or made a suggestion that enriched his movie. Altman also never missed an opportunity to run down the Richard Hooker novel on which his movie was based, which he called bad and racist, or (especially) the subsequent television series… which he called bad and racist…

One can well understand Altman’s bitterness. He was paid only $75,000 for directing a movie that, made for less than $4 million reaped $40 million at the box office at the time of its release (back, as they say, when $40 million was real money) and eventually became, through the teevee show, a cash-cow that is still being milked. Further, not only did 20th Century-Fox not exhibit the integrity and basic decency required to reward Altman with even a nominal bonus for having made their biggest-grossing picture of the year and the third highest-grossing movie released in 1970 but his teenage son eventually racked up some $2 million for writing the lyrics to that movie’s theme song. Although Altman liked to claim the movie gave him something more than money — his career — from his consistent, sour comments on it, the financial deprivations of MASH clearly bugged him for the remainder of his life.

About the book and the show, however, Robert Altman was full of shit.

Since first picking up, at the age of 13, the novel attributed to Richard Hooker (the nom de plume of the physician Richard Hornberger, Jr. in collaboration with the journalist W.C. Heinz, who polished the manuscript) I have read MASH more times than any other book, and always with undiminished pleasure. It is true that Hornberger was a social conservative, although his novel does not necessarily reflect that. It is also the case that, having been drafted and sent to Korea in 1952 he missed the period, roughly 1950 — 1951, during which the M.A.S.H (Mobile Army Surgical Hospital) units were at their most mobile, so there is no “bug-out” in the book as there often were before he arrived, and which later memorably occurred in the television series. I will further attest that, yes, Hornberger’s novel (like the eventual movie and, for a single season, the show) contains a black doctor called Oliver Wendell Jones and nicknamed “Spearchucker” during his college years as a javelin thrower. But since he is as much a part of “The Swamp” as Hawkeye Pierce, “Trapper John” McIntyre or Duke Forrest, the Southerner with whom he reaches a mutually respectful accommodation, and is a superior surgeon in no way stereotyped or subservient, I have never felt any racial animus toward this character on the part of the author. Indeed, Dr. Jones is such a part of the fraternity of the Swamp he’s also in the two subsequent novels Hornberger wrote in the 1970s.† (Although the author is, I admit, rather freer in MASH with the ugly epithet “gook,” still in use in the Vietnam era, as well as, at least once, “Chink.”) As for the series, which the rock-ribbed Maine Republican Hornberger despised for its liberal attitudes, the charge by Altman of racism is even more absurd. The last thing Larry Gelbart, who developed the show for television, would have wanted to be associated with was a racist series; while I have yet to meet anyone who (aside from myself) remembers watching it, Gelbart parlayed his “M*A*S*H” success into a second, short-lived comedy series called “Roll Out!” in 1973 and which centered on the black supply drivers in World War II France, and that at a time when there were no other series on the American air featuring a majority-black cast. (Even that superliberal Norman Lear didn’t have one until 1974 when “Good Times” premiered.) At least Hornberger ascribes to the Korean locals the wider variety of jobs they performed in the camps, which the series largely ignored… as did, for all his talk of other people’s racism, Altman’s movie.

Larry Gelbart’s “M*A*S*H” follow-up. Remember it? The young Ed Begley, Jr. was also in the cast.

Aside from the foregoing, the content of the “M*A*S*H” series speaks for itself, as it did for 11 seasons on CBS. The television “M*A*S*H” can be criticized on a number of levels, not least of which was its increasing preachiness and concessions to the vanity of its stars — Loretta Swit’s terrible 1980s hairdos, for example, and the softening of her character to the point where she barely had a reason to exist. But to deem the show as Altman frequently (and reflexively?) did “racist,” is risible.

Exactly why the novel MASH appeals to me to the degree that I’ve re-read it repeatedly since 1974 is a bit of a mystery, one I’m not sure I can fully explain. In addition to my deep fondness for the characters Hornberger created and who have become beloved of, by now, generations of readers, movie audiences and television (and home video) viewers across the globe, I suppose I like the dryness of his prose style and the matter-of-fact tone even when he’s describing outrages both comic and dramatic, as well as the genuinely witty manner with which the Swampmen communicate and the sharp playfulness of their verbal acrobatics, a trait they share in a more self-conscious, deliberately humorous manner with the characters in Catch-22 whose burlesque of language is of course representative of Joseph Heller’s satirical use of vaudeville humor. I admire the oddball characters in the book, seldom as self-righteous as their cinematic and television counterparts. I like its episodic structure — Ring Lardner, Jr., who adapted it for the movies, quite rightly observed that it was less a novel than a collection of short stories featuring the same characters — and the way it, like the movie, begins with Hawkeye and Duke arriving in Korea and ends with their leaving. I appreciate the seriousness with which the operating theatre is treated because Hornberger, like Lardner and Altman and Gelbart, never loses sight of why these men are in Korea. And, frankly, the book simply makes me laugh, a lot. I do think the series bested Hornberger and Altman in one respect: Making explicit what Gelbart considered the material’s perfect existential conundrum, young surgeons patching up even younger soldiers to be sent to the hospitals of Seoul and Tokyo where they will be given fuller treatment and rehabilitation and, all too often, returned to active duty to be shot (or in any case, shot at) and bombed again.

I suppose that, taken together, these novelistic factors simply exert a pull on my literary imagination that is irresistible. And that’s not to mention a few items not even the movie, for all its irreverence, dared to depict. I’m thinking partly of the way the Swampmen torment a staggeringly insensitive Protestant chaplain, partly of the way the “Painless Pole”‘s bout of impotence is resolved by dint of a blue ribbon tied around his prodigious appendage before he’s resurrected (Painless doesn’t know whether he went to Heaven or to Hell but wherever he was, he declares happily, “I won First Prize”) and mostly of the way Hawkeye and Duke raise the necessary tuition, room, board and travel expenses for their young houseboy Ho-Jon‡ to attend Pierce’s alma mater after he’s been drafted by the ROK Armed Forces, wounded in battle and fixed up by the Swampmen: By convincing Trapper John to grow out his beard and his locks, be photographed as Jesus, autograph hundreds of the subsequent snaps for sale as souvenirs and, kept perpetually drunk, be tied to a cross and dangled from a helicopter for personal appearances. It would undoubtedly have made a hilariously irreligious addition to the picture but even the sardonic atheist Lardner, whose only novel (The Ecstasy of Owen Muir) was an anti-clerical satire, wasn’t brave enough to include it in his screenplay and I doubt the lapsed-Catholic Altman could have gotten away with it on a studio picture in 1969 even if he’d tried.


It seems obvious that the same deranged genius who came up with the portmanteau montage logo for The Knack in 1966 also designed the weird, distinctive artwork for MASH in 1970 (or at least, that he was inspired by the older image, and improved upon it). Yet I have been unable in 45 years of searching to discover his name.

What Robert Altman did get away with in MASH was almost everything else, and which helped make the movie a cultural touchstone and a box-office phenomenon. Although thwarted in his attempt to make explicit that the picture was set in Vietnam (20th Century-Fox insisted on a “dedication scroll” making clear it was actually Korea) those who saw MASH when it was new and the increasingly hated war in Vietnam was raging fruitlessly and murderously on, especially its core youthful audience, had no difficulty drawing the inference.§ They understood that war is an obscenity beside which sexual pranks, irreligious commentary and four-letter words are as a few skinned knees to a holocaust. The things Altman, and Ingo Preminger, the movie’s producer, fought for, such as the bloody, sometimes painful and occasionally excruciating operating room scenes, were the things that mattered, and what MASH was about. (Gelbart and Gene Reynolds, the producer of the television series, had similar problems, at least in the early days of the show, with the suits at CBS.) The stark juxtaposition of humor with genuine horror, common now, was unique at the time. It’s intrinsic to the novel but, even for the late 1960s — the picture was filmed in 1969 but released in early 1970 — strikingly different from the then-current tone of movie comedy.

MASH didn’t sound like other American movies of the time either; Altman placed small mobile microphones on many of his actors, enabling him to catch what was necessary of the overlapping dialogue in the group scenes, such as in the mess hall when Duke and Hawkeye arrive in camp. Then there were screwball bits like the Japanese recordings of popular American songs of the early ’50s from Radio Tokyo and the inane announcements on the camp P.A. system, an effect arrived at during editing, was carried through the picture and which reaches a dazzling apogee at the end, when the announcer nonchalantly informs us that, “Tonight’s movie has been… MASH” and introduces the actors over fast clips from their performances. (Please refrain when describing this to your friends from using the hack-word “meta.”) And while Altman did not write, nor reap the rewards of, the lyrics to the cleverly titled “Suicide is Painless,” the phrase was his, as were the song’s poker metaphors; the Painless Pole (John Schuck) runs a 24-hour poker game in his tent. The look of MASH was different too: Not merely Altman’s use of zooms or the pointed way he and Danford B. Greene edited the picture but the rich, grainy diffusion of the widescreen Panavision images arrived at by the director and his gifted cinematographer Harold E. Stine; the only comparably shot (and edited) contemporary American movie comedy I can think of is The Graduate of 1967. Stine had to be flexible, as when on the day of filming the “farewell dinner” for Painless his director got the idea to shoot it as a parody of Da Vinci’s Last Supper, complete unto Elliott Gould crooking his finger at John Schuck à la Judas Iscariot. Hornberger calls the stag party The Last Supper in his novel, and Lardner repeats the line in his screenplay, so the idea was there from the beginning. It just took Altman’s perverse visual genius to make it explicit.

Lardner, whose credit (and subsequent Oscar) as the picture’s screenwriter was pretty much the last nail in the coffin of Red Scare-era blacklisting, rightly objected to the needless slapstick at the beginning of the movie, when a supply sergeant gets into a physical altercation with a pair of MPs after Hawkeye drives off in one of his jeeps and wrongly to the football game, which he felt was too long and lent the wrong tone, as well as to Hawkeye (Donald Sutherland) and Duke (Tom Skerritt) taunting Frank Burns (Robert Duvall) by leading a group-sing of “Onward, Christian Soldiers.” (The pair sing it in his script, but others in the camp don’t pick up on it as they do in the movie.) As to the game, Hornberger spends an equivalent amount of time on it in his novel, and its antic spirit is a needed corrective to the alternative deluges of blood and boredom the surgeons are faced with, both in the book and in the movie. The scenarist was understandably upset when he finally saw a screening of the picture. I doubt he’d ever encountered anything like it, and the shock of seeing and hearing Altman’s revolutionary approach to the scenes and the dialogue must have been profound for a man who got his start writing movie scripts in the early 1940s. Lardner reevaluated MASH over time (his Academy Award surely helped there) and so presumably recognized that Altman did not alter the script so much as he and his cast enhanced and enlivened it. Despite his own narcissism, even Altman freely and repeatedly gave his screenwriter credit for the movie’s shape and form, and its success. Lardner cleverly fused the religious nut in Duke and Hawkeye’s tent in the book with Burns, for example, and the basic structure of the movie is his. Altman credited his writer as well with concocting the vicious but very funny sequence in which the Swampmen wire Hot Lips’ tent for sound and broadcast her assignation with Frank over the P.A. system. (Father Mulcahy: “Is this The Bickersons? I love them.”) On the other hand, I don’t know whether it was Altman or the actors who came up with the notion of Hawkeye and Trapper camping it up the morning after Frank and Hot Lips’ thwarted liaison, but it hasn’t aged well.

“Well! What’s wrong with her?”

That isn’t the only example of dated “fag” humor in the picture. One area in which I fault Altman’s approach is the manner in which Painless reacts to his bout of temporary impotence in, respectively, the novel, the screenplay and the completed movie. Hornberger merely has Painless, a periodic depressive, listening to his prodigious appendage with Hawkeye’s stethoscope and announcing, “I think it’s dead.” Lardner has him assume that after an incident with a nurse in which he couldn’t achieve an erection he’s become “homosexual.” Altman and the movie’s Painless, John Schuck, up that ante (“Well… I’m a fairy”) which to their credit Hawkeye and the other doctors ridicule him for declaring on no evidence other than not being able to get it up a single time. This, in now-typical fashion, leads to current online ignoramuses writing that Painless “comes out as gay” to Hawkeye. Jesus, who breeds these idiots? And why?

Aside: Painless — or in any case, Schuck — is responsible in MASH for the first use of the word “fuck” in an American studio picture. Altman had instructed the actor to taunt his opponent on the football field and in a rehearsal ad lib Shuck barked, “All right, bub, your fuckin’ head is comin’ right off!” He had no idea Altman would use the take. Joan Tewkesbury, in the forward to her published Nashville screenplay, recalled the young 1970 audience exploding into cheers and applause when they heard that.¶


Those who come to MASH only after years of watching the television series can quickly grow bemused or even confused that characters they knew during the show’s long lifetime (and even lengthier afterlife) are so different in the movie. As played by Alan Alda and initially written by Gelbart, Hawkeye Pierce in particular is warmer and less snide than in Donald Sutherland’s original performance. (Alda’s Hawkeye is also a bachelor.) Duke of course never made it to teevee, and Spearchucker lasted less than a season. Radar started out on the series more or less as he was in the picture — Gary Burghoff considered him “a sardonic little guy,” far from the naïve innocent he quickly evolved into on the show. And Lt. Colonel Henry Blake is vastly different from book and movie to series. Hornberger’s (and Lardner and Altman’s) Blake (Roger Bowen) is Regular Army, not a civilian doctor drafted into command as McLean Stevenson’s Henry was on television. While as sweet in his own confused way as his series doppelgänger (the gentle William Christopher) Father Mulcahy (René Auberjonois) is more bumbling in the movie where, with his ginger Irish hair he’s known as “Dago Red.” The character in the picture who is furthest from his teevee counterpart is Frank Burns; Duvall’s Burns is as sour, incompetent and self-righteous as Larry Linville’s on the show but not nearly as much of a ninny. And while Linville is a brilliant comic technician and, occasionally, less than despicable, there’s a deeply unpleasant quality to Duvall’s performance, and to the character as Lardner (and, earlier, Hornberger) envisioned him. Although, despite his loathsomeness and hypocrisy, Frank’s exit from the 4077th, strapped into a straight-jacket and escorted by MPs is, I would argue, not presented by Altman as intentionally humorous — Duvall, photographed behind the rising heat waves of a trash-barrel fire, appears utterly depressed and defeated and even Sutherland’s Hawkeye looks away — viewers whose responses to Burns are trained by years of Linville’s portrayal roar with laughter at the sight; it’s happened every time I’ve seen MASH with an audience, and I would very much like to know if moviegoers in 1970, well before the series took hold of the popular imagination, reacted the same way. Young audiences were so reflexively anti-establishment then that it’s certainly possible even if their current, older selves rush to defend lying hack politicians and government institutions and demand censorship when it doesn’t appear quickly enough to satisfy their well-honed sense of self-loathing. They’ve become Frank Burns.

The stars of the ensemble: Fred Williamson, Sally Kellerman, Elliott Gould, Donald Sutherland, Jo Ann Pflug, Tom Skerritt

I don’t mean to suggest by my comments above that Sutherland is in any way a liability to the picture. In spite of his and his co-star’s discontent with Altman and attempts to get him replaced — for which Gould later apologized — the role of Hawkeye Pierce turned out to be a career-maker for Sutherland, who until then had been floating on the periphery of American movies. His persona as an actor tends to be dry and understated if not phlegmatic, entirely unlike Alan Alda’s, which sometimes makes him a bit of a chilly presence. Well, the Hawkeye Pierce of the novel isn’t the most ebullient character in the world either. Sutherland’s cool makes for a nice contrast with the warmer, scruffier appeal of Elliott Gould’s Trapper John and the half-cynical, half-perplexed Southern charm of Tom Skerritt’s Duke Forrest. Skerritt was even more of an unknown than Sutherland. (Gould was Ted in the 1969 Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice and had received an Academy Award nomination for his assured comic performance.) Tom Skerritt’s immense likability redeems a character who could have been a boor, especially in the early scenes where he is erotically aggressive to the exclusion of almost any other emotion and, later, a conventional Georgia bigot. Sally Kellerman’s Margaret Houlihan (called, curiously, “O’Houlihan” by both Roger Bowen and G. Wood’s General Hammond, but by no one else) is rigid and foolish but not silly, a complaint one could lodge against the TV version of her, at least in the early years, even as one was laughing at what Loretta Swit said and did. The movie’s “Hot Lips” becomes a bit silly, once her hard shell is softened, as when she leads cheers at the football match and seems utterly bewildered by the rules of the game. (Hot Lips: A red flag! We got a red flag! / Henry: It’s a penalty, you blithering idiots!)

The arrival of Margaret Houlihan.

Kellerman’s performance has very interesting curlicues, as when Trapper John is made Chief Surgeon and calls for sex, Lt. “Scorch” (Dawne Damon) is offered up to him and he points to Houlihan shouting, “No, no, no, that one — the sultry bitch with the fire in her eyes! Take her clothes off and bring her to me!” In Lardner’s script, “her eyes [are] blazing with indignation” but in the movie Kellerman’s flash with defiance… accompanied by a smirk of erotic interest. Kellerman’s Hot Lips takes the journey in under two hours that it took the producers of the TV “M*A*S*H” five seasons to achieve. By the end of the movie she’s not only relaxed, perhaps more than could reasonably have been expected, she’s succumbed to Duke’s charms; the look of panic she expresses with only her eyes at the news that he’s being discharged from the Army is remarkable, and gives the character a sudden and unexpected aura of emotional vulnerability. Her best scene, of course, is just after the shower revelation, when she demands that Henry court-martial the Swampmen (“This isn’t a hospital, it’s an insane asylum…”) Altman cannily had Kellerman do the scene directly after she’d gone through the shower sequence, when the actress’s emotions were still on edge and it’s among the pictures’ most indelible moments. I suspect it was this hysterical monologue, and the look of utter disbelief on her face when Henry dismisses her, that got Kellerman her Academy Award nomination.

The company Altman assembled for MASH in 1969 may well have been the best ensemble cast seen in an American comedy in three decades, or since His Girl Friday in 1940, and even there the range of characters was much smaller. I don’t think there have ever been as many “Introducing” credits in a movie before or since, and many of those actors went on to decades of success in movies, television and (in the case of René Auberjonois) theatre. Roger Bowen’s Henry Blake is not the lovable klutz played so memorably by McLean Stevenson; he’s Regular Army yet easily manipulated by the Swampmen and almost pathetically eager to speechify (“Ever since the dark days before Pearl Harbor I have proudly worn this uniform…”) Auberjonois’ Mulcahy is as well-meaning as William Christopher’s eventual teevee iteration but more tenuously connected to the world; he stumbles around in a gentle daze, equally fearful of giving offense to man and God. In the instantly infamous group revelation of Hot Lips Houlihan’s true hair color his first response is to shield Ho-Jon’s eyes, and he’s terrified of giving absolution to the would-be suicide Painless, even though he knows, as Painless doesn’t, that the whole thing is a charade. It was Auberjonois who discovered the blessing for a chariot and suggested he speak it over Duke and Hawkeye’s jeep at the end, sure that Altman would love it. (He did.)

David Arkin is very funny as Blake’s ineffectual aid Vollmer, the unexpected hero of the football game, whom no one in camp respects or heeds and who is heard (along with Marvin Miller and, supposedly, Ted Knight) throughout the picture reading the absurdly gung-ho war-movie come-ons and administrative announcements over the P.A. system, some of which Altman altered from actual memos at Fox. For the series, Gelbart and Reynolds essentially conflated Vollmer and Radar and made him less officious, as Arkin is, than un-worldly. My only complaint about Altman’s otherwise nearly perfect casting has to do with Carl Gottlieb as the anesthesiologist “Ugly John.” This has nothing to do with Gottlieb’s performance but with what seems an almost deliberate misunderstanding of the character’s name. As Hornberger makes clear in the novel, “Ugly John” got his name from being the handsomest man at the 4077th. (At least Gottlieb is, while heavy, reasonably attractive. The casting of the undeniably homely John Orchard, who played the role during the first season of the television series, almost seems cruel by comparison.) Especially notable among the supporting ensemble are the charming Jo Ann Pflug as Lt. “Dish”; the strikingly beautiful Indus Arthur as Henry’s bed-mate Leslie; Ken Prymus singing “Suicide is Painless” during The Last Supper and grinning with the pleasure of performance even as the words he’s vocalizing are wholly to do with death; Fred Williamson, remarkably assured in his movie debut; the understated Michael Murphy as “Me Lay” Marston; Bud Cort as the gullible Private Boone; Dale Ishimoto, splendid as the doctor examining Ho-Jon at the Korean induction center; and the songwriter Bobby Troup as the beleaguered sergeant whose response to the golf-happy Hawkeye and Trapper John is to repeat the concise phrase, “Goddamn army.”


Sound and image: Robert Altman’s signature look and aural tone are evident in the first dialogue sequence following the titles.

I have written elsewhere that, while I am a militant anti-auteurist, at least as regards non-writer/directors, Robert Altman tends to be the exception to every one of my rules. I was disgusted the other day to stumble across one of those ridiculous internet polls on movies, this one listing Altman as “the 34th greatest director of all time.” I was too dispirited by this to look any further, but I’d be willing to bet that Quentin Tarantino and Martin Scorsese both placed in the top ten, if not the top five. I’m not claiming that Altman deserves the ultimate slot — I don’t know who does, nor do I care especially — but if it isn’t John Ford or Orson Welles or Francis Coppola or Robert Altman, I also don’t know what greatness means any longer. Of all American sound film directors, only these four it seems to me were genuine poets, and seeing their best work not only alters the way one views movies, it alters the viewer.**

Not that there is a great deal of poetry on display in MASH; its tone is too antic, and subversive. There’s nothing in it that rivals the image of Warren Beatty dying in the snow or Julie Christie’s faraway opium gaze at the end of McCabe and Mrs. Miller, or the women listening to Keith Carradine singing “I’m Easy” in Nashville, or the dreamlike imagery of 3 Women, or the haunting juxtaposition of the funeral rites that begin Vincent and Theo with, on the soundtrack, the multi-million dollar auction of Van Gogh’s “Sunflowers” with its privileged fiscal obscenity, the figures rising ever higher as Vincent’s body is placed in a pauper’s grave. But if ever a filmmaker’s identifiable, idiosyncratic touch is evident from the opening frames of a movie, it’s here. Audiences in 1970 couldn’t have known of course that Robert Altman’s highly individualistic aural and visual aesthetic was, essentially, being unveiled in MASH, but two or three pictures later those elements were obvious and recurrent enough to be considered a personal style. Altman was amused at having become an adjective, and bemused by how often the term “Altmanesque” concerned externals only. But this is the way of such things. What people generally mean by that neologism is items like overlapping dialogue, slow camera zooms, an improvisatory approach (which does not mean letting actors improvise during a take) and ensemble acting. What isn’t considered as often is tone, and the filmmaker’s humanist concerns.


Gelbart always credited Altman with the look of the TV “M*A*S*H,” naturally achieved in miniature, and the series opening is essentially a paraphrase of the movie’s credit sequence, helicopters flying the wounded into the 4077th and the personnel on the ground scrambling to get these damaged bodies to Pre-Op. And if the hills and even the camp itself look uncannily like those of the movie it’s because the series was shot on the picture’s standing sets, and in the hills of what was then the Fox location ranch and is now the Malibu Creek State Park. (The exterior of the Swamp is clearly the same, right down to the Moorish hex symbol painted on the door, but Hawkeye’s gin still is original to the series.) Set designs aside, Altman’s sensibilities are all over MASH, mostly to the good. The innovative use of sound was a key part of his technical approach and I’ve always been taken with the way during Duke and Hawkeye’s discussion with Henry Blake about getting in a chest surgeon the filmmaker cuts to the men on duty in a very busy (and very bloody) Pre-Op while the dialogue continues on the soundtrack, the Swampmen’s point about being understaffed made explicit by the vivid juxtaposition of word and image. Or take the way during the eavesdropping on Frank Burns and Hot Lips the P.A. system attains a disturbing, echoey sound that matches the would-be lovers’ panic. Or how, when the generator fails and plunges the O.R. into blackness and nurses appear with flashlight torches, the doctors begin singing “When the Lights Go On Again (All Over the World.)” Altman’s Operating Room is not only bloodier than the O.R. of the television series, it’s noisier. When Hawkeye is amputating a leg, we hear the sound of the saw cutting through bone. When suction is applied by a nurse, that is heard as well.

Altman was light on his feet throughout the filming, adapting to take advantage of happy accidents, such as the crashed helicopter in the background during the scene in which the doctors question whether Major Houlihan is a natural blonde. (A Fox pilot had crashed the ‘copter; he was unhurt.) In this Altman resembles Orson Welles, as indeed does his concern with sound. When Hawkeye and Trapper John return from golfing in Tokyo wearing plus fours and are immediately engulfed in wounded patients, the director films them at floor level from the calves up amid scrap buckets, blood and gore. (He claimed he wasn’t interested in filming the Tokyo sequence until he saw that image. Yet another load, if you’ll forgive me, of patented Altman bullshit. Why were they wearing those duds if they hadn’t gone golfing in Japan?) Occasionally an attempt at indirection is strained, as when Lt. Dish leaves for home, seemingly in a fury at having been conned by Hawkeye into sleeping with the well-endowed Painless Pole after his “suicide” until, airborne in a helicopter, she looks directly into the lens and grins delightedly.

A much more effective feint is Duke’s homecoming fantasy when Hawkeye announces their orders have come through. It was, in imitation of the novel, in Lardner’s screenplay, but as a realistic scene. Making it purely imaginary is a marvelous touch, as is the improvement on Hornberger in the mess scene in which Hawkeye tells off Major Houlihan and she asks, to the world at large, “I wonder how a degenerated person like that could have reached a position of responsibility in the Army Medical Corps?” In the book, and in Lardner’s screenplay, the question is addressed to Hawkeye who replies, “Sister, if I knew the answer to that, I sure as hell wouldn’t be here.” How much richer, funnier and more satisfying, in the movie, is Father Mulcahy’s simple declaration, “He was drafted.” Curiously, it was not Lardner who gave Kellerman the line that forever connects Margaret Houlihan to her nickname (“Oh, Frank, my lips are hot! Kiss my hot lips!”) He did, however, go further in his script than Altman as far as vulgarity is concerned when, speculating on the color of Hot Lips’ pubic hair Duke opines that he prefers “blonde pussy.” But had there been heard in any movie before MASH the sound of women leading a cheer for a numbered football player (Tim Brown in this case) with the words, “69 is divine!”?

My cavils about the way Altman put MASH together are so few it almost feels churlish to mention them. The O.R. scene where Trapper John gives Houlihan a backhanded compliment (“Hot Lips, you may be a pain in the ass but you’re a damn good nurse”) and she murmurs, “Thanks, Trapper” precedes the shower scene but the change in her character feels like something that should occur much later in the movie, before the football game. That’s a continuity flaw; my other complaints concern content. When “Dago Red” asks how he enjoyed his visit to Tokyo Trapper’s response (“I screwed a Kabuki dancer”) is appalling. Mulcahy isn’t Frank Burns. Why insult the poor man that way? Similarly, there’s a terrible moment of Hawkeye and Trapper babbling in mock-Japanese on their arrival in Tokyo which, judging from the way what Sutherland and Gould say in voice-over in no way matches what the actors are speaking on film, was a deliberate after-thought by Altman. This from the man who constantly accused Richard Hornberger and Larry Gelbart of racism?


The original music and dialogue soundtrack LP

As an example of Robert Altman’s perversity, nothing concerning MASH exceeds the germination of what may be its most recognized element: Johnny Mandel’s theme, replicated in hundreds of television episodes and far and away the melody for which its versatile composer is best known. When he conceived the need for a song to send Painless off, Altman very cannily selected the theme (death), the central metaphor (poker) and a title that brought together the name of Schuck’s character with the notion of suicide. Yet he insisted that it ought to be “the stupidest song ever written,” for which his “idiot son” should write the lyrics. Mandel later said he had to get drunk to set Mike Altman’s lyrics which, even if do they revolve around an assonant near-rhyme (“Suicide is painless/It brings on many changes…”) are strikingly mature to have come from the mind and imagination of a 14-year old. Yet his father clearly wanted a deliberately bad song, with “stupid” music. Would anyone still be humming Mandel’s melody if Altman had gotten what he asked for?

To the director’s credit, he was impressed enough by the song to have it recorded for the main title sequence, where “Suicide is Painless” benefited enormously from the superb orchestrations by Herbert W. Spencer. Think of how softly it begins, with strummed acoustic guitar chords in B minor interspersed with finger cymbal chimes and eventual strings and percussion, wrapped around a Brian Wilson-style vocal. The song, and that particular arrangement of it, are so good it is astonishing to see what other movie songs in 1970 got the Oscar nomination Mandel and Mike Altman didn’t. I have no quarrel with “For All We Know” from Lovers and Other Strangers, the eventual winner, nor with the magnificent Henry Mancini and Johnny Mercer song “Whistling Away the Dark” from Darling Lili, nor for that matter with Leslie Bricusse’s sardonic “Thank You Very Much” from Scrooge. But can anyone tell me why two numbers no one remembers (“Till Love Touches Your Life” from something called Madron, and “Pieces of Dreams,” from, as they used to say, the film of the same name) were doing on the list even if the latter was by Michel Legrand and Alan Bergman and Marilyn Bergman?

Mandel, one of the most original voices of his era, was not only a superb craftsman who could with equal invention assay pictures as disparate as The Americanization of Emily, The Sandpiper (for which he and Paul Francis Webster won Best Song for “The Shadow of Your Smile”), Harper, The Russians Are Coming The Russians Are Coming, Point Blank, Escape to Witch Mountain, The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea, Agatha and The Verdict; he was also an accomplished jazz performer and composed one of the few true jazz (as opposed to jazzy or jazz-inspired) movie scores, for I Want to Live! Although his MASH score is brief it includes the most felicitous of several military marches he composed for movies (it takes off neatly from Alfred Newman’s 20th Century-Fox fanfare), a hilariously sanctified accompaniment for Lt. Dish’s unveiling of the Painless Pole’s stupendous accoutrement, deliberately melodramatic underscore for the scene in Tokyo where Hawkeye and Trapper confront the MPs with a mock-serious invocation of spy movie clichés, and an amusing gallop for the football game, complete with slide-whistle. Good comedy scores that do not attempt to be humorous through lugubrious mickeymousing are rare. Genuinely witty ones are the unicorns of cinematic euphony.

Rather shockingly, while MASH received five Academy Award nominations including Picture and Director, it was not nominated for its highly distinctive — and, for its time, revolutionary — sound. And speaking of such things: I was astounded several years ago while leafing through the MusicHound soundtrack guide to note that the MASH soundtrack album was given the lowest rating (a “Woof!”) while the author of the brief review claimed that the LP was pointless and that one might listen to it once but not twice. I grant you that when I got my copy in 1974 and listened to the record incessantly I was a MASH-crazy 13-year-old (and home-video in the form of cassettes or laserdiscs did not yet exist for most Americans.) But as a keepsake of the movie, I don’t see how the Columbia producer Thomas Z. Shepard’s calculatedly messy album could be bettered. Shepard, who for years afterward was Sondheim’s indispensable cast album producer, understood instinctively what Altman had wrought, and brilliantly replicated it as a listening experience. The dialogue excerpts were not only well chosen, they were edited brilliantly, even dazzlingly, into the whole, creating a small small masterpiece of comic collage. If nothing else Shepard isolated some key lines in the football sequence in a way I wish Altman had — so they can actually be heard.

Text copyright 2002 by Scott Ross


*The picture, like the book on which it was based, was called MASH, not M*A*S*H. It’s MASH in the opening credits; the asterisks were added to the poster art, the subsequent paperback reissues of the source novel, the 1970 soundtrack LP and of course the television series.

†Hornberger was also listed as the co-author of a dozen M*A*S*H Goes to… novels in the mid-to-late-1970s but these books, commissioned to cash in on the roaring success of the television series, were written entirely by William E. Butterworth. (His own titles were the 1971 M*A*S*H Goes to Maine and the 1977 M*A*S*H Mania.) Hornberger was infuriated when the movie took off because he’d sold his rights for a mere few thousand dollars — in that he certainly resembled Robert Altman — so in addition to the millions of Pocket Books paperback reissue copies that continued to sell well into the ’80s these “sequel” novels, even if he didn’t write a word of them, were a good means to fast cash for him as the copyright holder.

‡Ho-Jon’s arrival at the 4077th as a war casualty was part of a subplot cut from MASH before its release. Supposedly his dead body was originally removed during the football game sequence, and while one appreciates the filmmakers’ juxtaposition of high-powered leisure activity with grim reality, the moment would surely have destroyed the comedy of the ball game and brought down the entire picture. (Lardner’s screenplay contains a sad, ambiguous moment when a recurrence of his wound is deemed inoperable, but not the boy’s subsequent death.) Interestingly, the North Korean soldier on the operating table is not Kim Atwood, but Atwood is clearly who is subsequently being operated on. It seems obvious that Altman and his editors were forced to splice two separate sequences together for the sake of continuity, but considering the director’s wanton attributions of racism to Hooker, Gelbart and everyone else, there is a whiff of “they all look alike” in the confusion of the North Korean and the former Swamp houseboy. Parenthetically, “Ho-Jon” is allegedly not a Korean name.

§The hats worn by what the U.S. military is pleased to call “indigenous personnel” during the Seoul sequence are deliberately incorrect, as Altman insisted they be Vietnamese and not Korean, even though Hawkeye jokingly says the boy should go to the head of the line because he’s one of Korean president Syngman Rhee’s sons and all radio news stories heard on the soundtrack are datelined Korea. Once again, so much for Altman’s claims. That scroll, which includes one of Dwight D. Eisenhower’s more famous election pledges, reminds me of something Gore Vidal once said of him: “Eisenhower always read his campaign speeches with a real sense of discovery. ‘And if elected… I will go to Korea?!?‘”

¶Being too young to have seen MASH in a theater I had to make do with the autumn 1974 “CBS Friday Night Movies” airing of it which was of course heavily censored. Given the soundtrack album for Christmas, when I heard Schuck say that line the top of my 13-going-on-14-year old’s head nearly came off. I finally got to see the picture on a big screen a year or so later and was bitterly disappointed that it had been re-cut for a “PG” rating, the word “fuckin'” dropped out on the soundtrack (and the Hot Lips shower scene truncated, as well as some of the OR gore). It wasn’t that I had a prurient interest in hearing “fuck” in a movie — this was the ’70s after all and the “R”-rated American pictures I was getting in to see then were becoming routinely more profane, as was the popular fiction I was then reading — but I did want to see my movies, if I was experiencing them in a theater rather than on a TV set, unadulterated. I saw the picture subsequently several times in this bowdlerized fashion, in theaters and on cable, before Fox finally released the original, un-tampered-with MASH on home video. Similarly, when the picture was re-released in 1973 (along with the reissue of the 1970 soundtrack LP I was given in ’74) Fox removed the “Suicide is Painless” vocal from the main title of both movie and record and replaced it with Ahmad Jamal’s funky (and identically-timed) instrumental. Fortunately, the vocal was eventually reinstated in the picture. An eventual CD release of the soundtrack includes both.

**Note that I said both “sound” and “American.” The poets of silent film range from D.W. Griffith and King Vidor to Buster Keaton and his collaborators, and there is no shortage of great, poetic filmmakers, sound and silent, in world cinema.


Post-Script, January 2023
Anent my comments below, in the footnote section, on the M*A*S*H Goes to… novels of the 1970s attributed to William E. Butterworth and Richard Hooker: I attempted over the holidays to re-read them for the first time since the age of 14 or 15, and had to give it up as a bad job after two and a half titles, leaving nine-and-a-half unread. If Hooker wrote any of the material in them, the only trace of his style (and medical expertise) I can find in the books are the occasional passages involving surgical procedure. What Butterworth, their apparent actual author, is chiefly concerned with is depicting convoluted and determinedly “wacky” scenarios involving versions of Hawkeye, Trapper John and “Hot Lips” Houlihan that bear little relation to their previous literary counterparts (and none at all to their television versions) with a growing, and increasingly annoying, supporting cast including an obnoxious Russian-American opera singer, two bumbling New Orleans-based reporters, a sexually suspect diplomat, a gaggle of alcoholic (and extremely unfunny) Cajuns and — God help us — a largely benign, German-inflected, Yiddish-prone American Secretary of State who can only be a comic rendition of that Teutonic psychopath Henry Kissinger. Even worse (if such can be imaged) the social and “comedic” attitudes exhibited by Butterworth, a genuine hack who under the pen-name W.E.B. Griffin published nearly 60 military-themed thriller, are stuck in some weird, reactionary world where women are either brainless sex-pots, alternately cooing or suspicious sitcom-like hausfraus, militant man-hating “libbers” and/or “radical” lefties and gay men are “exquisitely mannered,” wispy little queens or sex-mad, prissy faggots. Butterworth’s moving of the action in these books to the 1970s also makes hay of the characters’ original ages; “Hot Lips,” for example, is described by Hooker/Hornberger in MASH as being “fortyish,” making her, if you care to extrapolate, “sixtyish” in the books although still depicted as a hot, stacked number lusted after by many. At the beginning of the second book (M*A*S*H Goes to Paris) Hawkeye and his wife Mary are expecting another child, although both would be, in Hooker’s chronology, in their 50s. One almost gets the idea, reading these novels, that time has in some weird way frozen since 1951, although Henry Blake shows up periodically as a Major-General. Based on the first three titles, the series is about as ugly a betrayal of the affections of M*A*S*H aficionados as can be imagined. Butterworth even renames Walter “Radar” O’Reilly “Robespierre,” and Hooker lets him get away with it. Robespierre O’Reilly?!?

The Magic Factory, Part Three of Four: A Few Essential Books About the Movies — An Annotated List. Screenwriters, Screenwriting and Screenplays.

Standard

By Scott Ross

See also: Part One
https://scottross79.wordpress.com/2022/03/03/the-magic-factory-a-few-essential-books-about-the-movies-an-annotated-list-part-one-actors-and-animation/

Part Two
https://scottross79.wordpress.com/2022/04/06/the-magic-factory-a-few-essential-books-about-the-movies-an-annotated-list-part-two-criticism-and-filmmakers/

Part Four
https://scottross79.wordpress.com/2022/04/16/the-magic-factory-part-four-an-annotated-list-of-a-few-essential-books-about-the-movies-individual-films-and-miscellaneous-titles/

Note the First: I do not by any means claim that this list, which I am posting in installments, is either exhaustive or definitive. It’s merely obsessive. And highly personal. This is my list, based on my experience, my likes and prejudices and my reading, Your list will differ wildly. I merely mean to recommend a few books that influenced me and that you might also enjoy.

Note the Second: Although the list, when it’s finished, is meant to add up to 100, I am going to fiddle outrageously with the numbers. When within a particular category a writer has a number of titles, or a series of books, or I mention a volume by someone else on the same topic, I will count them all as one entry. It’s my party, and I’ll cheat if I want to.


V. Screenwriters and Screenwriting

When I refer to myself as an anti-auteurist I realize I may be creating some confusion, since it should be obvious to the casual reader of these pages that I also honor a number of favored filmmakers. Most of these, however, are or were either writer-directors (Charles Chaplin, Buster Keaton, Preston Sturges, John Huston, Orson Welles, Billy Wilder, Samuel Fuller, Blake Edwards, Paul Mazursky, Robert Benton, Oliver Stone); directors who could have taken screenwriter credit on almost any movie they made, and sometimes did (David Lean, Peter Bogdanovich, Sidney Lumet); almost never did (Alfred Hitchcock); never did (Leo McCarey, Howard Hawks); or who habitually worked closely with screenwriters to develop the movies they directed (Ford, Cukor, William Wyler, Martin Ritt, John Schlesinger). Perhaps it’s a limitation in me, but I have never been able to fathom how so many movie critics could embrace the misrepresentation of the French theory — which was far more selective and referred only to certain filmmakers — and warp it, as Andrew Sarris did, to suggest that every movie director is the “author” of any picture he or she makes. And my mystification is centered on one simple fact: That critics are writers too. Why are they so hot to strip the credit from others?

As a result of this madness, any hack or beginner can slap a possessive credit on a movie, even if the script he’s shooting is the seventeenth draft of a screenplay that’s been re-written by a dozen different writers, only two or three of whom will likely be credited. Look up any movie title on any online search engine and when it pops up the first entry will read, “A film by…” Nearly as bad, even as great a home video producer as Criterion reflexively places either that or an apostrophe and an “s” on the cover of every disc, even when to do so is patently absurd, as in its release of the 1952 The Importance of Being Earnest which it describes as “Anthony Asquith’s.” Surely the possessive attribution is due to Oscar Wilde? After all, even the New Testament admits that in the beginning was the word. But then the Word was God’s, and for an auteurist that can only mean a director.

48. Adventures in the Screen Trade: A Personal View of Hollywood and Screenwriting William Goldman (1983)

It is entirely appropriate that the first volume on this list be Goldman’s, because no other screenwriter had or has ever written a book which became, and so quickly, immortal, at least in Hollywood. Goldman had already bequeathed to the world an epigraph — “Follow the money” — that is now so much a part of the common language it is routinely cited in reference to corruption by people who have no idea what its provenance is. (And it was Goldman, not “Deep Throat,” who came up with the phrase, in his screenplay for All the President’s Men.) To this he added a new one, which caught on so quickly it’s employed by the very sort of smug people its author was talking about when he first wrote it: In coining the dictum “Nobody knows anything,” Goldman was asserting that, essentially, all movies that become hits, unless they are sequels to other hits, are what is dismissively referred to as a “non-recurring phenomenon.” No one ever knows what will succeed, or fail, and those who think they do are in for some nasty surprises. Goldman also wrote a tertiary epigraph which is much less often quoted, but which should be tattooed on the inner eyelids of every screenwriter: “Screenplays are structure.” But they are not, as so many ignoramuses aver, “blueprints.” Change a blueprint while you’re building and see how well the construction stands.

You may agree or disagree with Goldman’s other observations (I for instance love the movie the writer/director Philip Kaufman made from Tom Wolfe’s The Right Stuff, and would not have wanted to see the flag-waving version Goldman wrote) or see him as a facile, talented smart-ass. I don’t know how his novels, which I began to devour at age 15, might read for a younger audience, but I like his writing, both for print and movies, too much to find fault with much of it, although I do admit to being one of the few people I know who isn’t gaga over the movie of The Princess Bride, perhaps because I cherish the novel. In any case, it’s a safe bet no screenwriter will ever create, with a book, the stir Goldman did with this one.


49. Backstory 1: Interviews with Screenwriters of Hollywood’s Golden Age / Backstory 2: Interviews with Screenwriters of the 1940s and 1950s / Backstory 3: Interviews with Screenwriters of the 60s and Backstory 4: Interviewers with Screenwriters of the 1970s and 1980s Edited by Patrick McGilligan (1988 – 2006)

One of our finest biographers of moviemakers, McGilligan also conducted (or edited those conducted by others) dozens of interviews with American screenwriters and published these in five volumes over 21 years. The Backstory series includes discussions with Niven Busch, Alan Scott (author or co-writer of many of the witty scripts for the Astaire-Rogers pictures), Donald Ogden Stewart, Philip Dunne, Julius J. Epstein, Richard Maibaum, Leigh Brackett, Betty Comden and Adolph Green, Garson Kanin, Arthur Laurents, the blacklisted Ben Maddow, Stewart Stern, the ubiquitous blacklistee front Philip Yordan, Jay Presson Allen, George Axelrod, Walter Bernstein, Hitchcock’s great 1950s screenwriter John Michael Hayes, Ring Lardner Jr., Richard Matheson, Wendell Mayes, Irving Ravetch and Harriet Frank Jr., Sterling Silliphant, Terry Southern, Robert Benton, Blake Edwards, Walter Hill, Ruth Prawer Jhabvala, Elmore Leonard, Paul Mazursky, Frederic Raphael, Alvin Sargent and Donald E. Westlake. That’s practically the entire history of the talkies to the turn of the century.

I have not read McGilligan’s 2009 volume (Backstory 5: Interviews with Screenwriters of the 1990s) largely because I have so little interest in movies of the 1990s. Once, in real time, was more than sufficient.


50. Talking Pictures: Screenwriters in the American Cinema Richard Corliss (1975)

Unique in its time, and even to today, Corliss’ second book on movie writers is a perceptive series of essays grouping together scenarists and their representative scripts — a sort of critical bestiary of screenwriters. Amid Corliss’ piquant observations: Anent the 1970 movie of MASH for which the blacklisted Ring Lardner, Jr. won an Oscar, that the much-loved Hawkeye and Trapper John often behave like fraternity bullyboys, no better than their adversaries and in some ways worse. Among his discoveries: That letters form such a strong narrative thread in the movies written or co-authored by Howard Koch (such as Casablanca) they are almost a personal signature.

See also: The Hollywood Screenwriters (A Film Comment Book) Richard Corliss (1972) The first of Corliss’ books on screenwriting is a collection of essays and interviews which, in Dr. Roseanne Welch’s apt words, “was a seminal work… in terms of bringing the screenwriter out from under the director’s shadow following a decade of auteurist criticism run rampant.” Frustratingly, in a 1990s issue of Film Comment Corliss repudiated his own 1970s defense of screenwriters. Oh, well; he also around that time began using the teenage neologism “way” in place of the perfectly acceptable and grammatically effective “much,” “far” and “more” which had sufficed for centuries. As, alas, did every other adult in America.


51. The Hollywood Writers’ Wars Nancy Lynn Schwartz; Completed by Sheila Schwartz (1982)

If there is an essential volume of screenwriting history, the Schwartzes’ book is it. A wide-ranging account of the oft-thwarted attempt of a majority of scenarists to set up a union, the vicious opposition of the studios — which set up Screen Playwrights, their own, reactionary union, one most writers, quite properly, disdained or chafed under the yoke of — and the ultimate triumph of the Screen Writers Guild. The only sad thing about The Hollywood Writers’ Wars is that its author did not live to complete it, dying in agony of a brain tumor at an obscenely young age.


52. Laughing Matters: On Writing M*A*S*H, Tootsie, Oh, God! and a Few Other Funny Things Larry Gelbart (1998)

With the possible exceptions of Ben Hecht and Billy Wilder, I don’t know of a wittier American writer of screenplays than Larry Gelbart, or a more verbally elegant one. (As a playwright and librettist he was scarcely less impressive, writing with Burt Shevelove the achingly funny book for A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum, and, solo, the hilarious one for the Cy Coleman musical City of Angels, the great Iran-Contra satire Mastergate, the funny and terrifying Power Failure and the Volpone-inspired Sly Fox, the single funniest playscript I’ve ever read.) Although his range was great his comic work is marked by two related attributes: His general literacy, and his gift for malaprop, usually in the service of overturning a verbal cliché. Recently, while watching a DVD of sketches from “Caesar’s Hour” I heard a line that I would be willing to bet money was Gelbart’s: Caesar, playing a vaudeville hoofer, avers that he’s a great dancer because “I’ve got ten toes in my heart.” Although he seldom received solo credit as a screenwriter — Oh, God! was a notable exception — Gelbart’s writing infused the projects on which he worked with sparkling wit and a seriousness of purpose that is at the root of all great comedy. His memoir is an unalloyed delight.

See also: Original Story By: A Memoir of Broadway and Hollywood Arthur Laurents (2000) Laurents virtually defined the word “prickly,” his later dogmatism sometimes destroying decades-long friendships. He was also, as a playwright, librettist and screenwriter, seldom as great as one hoped he would be. On the other hand, he was associated with three musical classics (West Side Story, Anyone Can Whistle and, especially, Gypsy) and wrote two exceptional screenplays whose subsequent movies their respective directors fucked up through insecurity and compromise: The Turning Point and The Way We Were. Whatever his flaws as a human being, Laurents’ memoir is an eye-opener, fascinating, articulate and compelling.


53. Mad as Hell: The Life and Work of Paddy Chayefsky Shaun Considine (1994)

Of all American playwrights and screenwriters, few were as drunk on words as Paddy Chayefsky. In the 1970s, going to see a movie written by Chayefsky (who was without a doubt the auteur of those pictures) was an exhilarating experience, the writers’ mordant wit and “outrageous” point of view, wedded to his dazzling verbosity, combining to give viewers almost an entirely new genre, something we might call rhetorical slapstick. Although Pauline Kael for one accused Chayefsky of being a reactionary, I don’t think she quite understood his position as a satirist. (Although certainly he behaved like a reactionary the night Vanessa Redgrave made her … is “ill-considered” the correct word?… acceptance speech at the Academy Awards.) Initially celebrated as the poet of kitchen-sink drama for television plays like “Marty” and “The Mother,” Chayefsky gradually began to explore larger ideas, and social comedy, and his dialogue became more expansive, less realistic and far more memorable. So memorable, in fact, that even when a broad audience embraced his expression, it didn’t always understand what he had in mind; in 1976, “I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this anymore!” became the watch-cry of Americans who were fed up with… well, just about everything. What the people who repeated the phrase didn’t quite understand was that the aphorism was uttered in Network by an unbalanced schizophrenic. Considine does an admirable job of research and writing, capturing a nonpareil in all his nettlesome genius.


54. The Craft of the Screenwriter: Interviews with Six Celebrated Screenwriters John Brady (1982)

Brady’s splendid book consists of long and free-ranging interviews with five of the great screenwriters of the era and one interloper whose scant worth to movie history has, I think, been proven over time…and I am not referring to Paddy Chayefsky, William Goldman, Ernest Lehman, Neil Simon or Robert Towne. Interestingly, the most informative chapter for me as a young playwright was the Simon interview, which I hadn’t expected to enjoy as much as did, or to find so useful in a practical sense. (The book was published long before the emergence of the mature Simon of Lost in Yonkers, remember.) I only regret that Brady didn’t know, as no one did until fairly recently, that Edward Taylor co-authored every script Robert Towne took solo credit for. I haven’t pulled The Craft of the Screenwriter down from the shelf in years, so it will be interesting to re-read that interview in light of what Sam Wasson dug up on the matter for his book on Chinatown.


55. What Happens Next: A History of American Screenwriting Marc Norman (2008)

An engaging, unusually intelligent history of screenwriting by a screenwriter, which may be a first. Norman, who wrote the vastly entertaining novel (and subsequent movie) Oklahoma Crude and later won an Oscar for a romantic comedy about Shakespeare I haven’t seen due to what I consider an impossible imbecility at its core (Romeo and Ethel, the Pirate’s Daughter indeed!) not only provides a rich, spirited novelistic history of the screenwriter in Hollywood but, as his title suggests, the contours of his craft: The what-happens-next? of celluloid storytelling.

See also: Some Time in the Sun: The Hollywood Years of F. Scott Fitzgerald, William Faulkner, Nathaniel West, Aldous Huxley and James Agee Tom Dardis (1976) Dardis’ book is especially useful for its debunking of the legend that surrounds Fitzgerald’s late Hollywood period, written as a refutation of Aaron Latham’s myth-reinforcing book Crazy Sundays.


VI. Screenplays

In the 1970s, when “film studies” was everywhere, screenplays got published at a dizzying rate. Some now make one scratch one’s head in bemusement (Cisco Pike? Little Fauss and Big Halsey? Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid? Two-Lane Blacktop???) Others, like Easy Rider, were cutting continuity scripts, difficult to read… if you wanted to read the screenplay of Easy Rider, and I can’t imagine who would. The most enjoyable, like Goldman’s Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, were written to be read and are less concerned with outlining elaborate tracking shots (which anyway the director is going to ignore when he comes to shoot the thing) than with establishing and prolonging humor, mood and suspense. The best, such as those in the University of Wisconsin Warner Brothers series, contained long, informative histories of the pictures themselves and many frame blow-ups. But there were those who felt the practice of putting screenplays into print was a dubious idea at best; Larry McMurtry, himself a screenwriter, disdained them as “non-books.” He may have had a point.

I admit I read them less often now than I did when I was an adolescent and becoming besotted with movies, needing movie books the way a dope-fiend needs a fix. But the best of them are pleasant keepsakes of movies that meant, and mean, something to me.

56. The Annotated Godfather: The Complete Screenplay with Commentary on Every Scene, Interviews, and Little-Known Facts Jenny Jones, ed. (Screenplay by Francis Ford Coppola and Mario Puzo) 2007

I wish Jones would repeat this for The Godfather Part II, without doubt the finest sequel ever made to an already magnificent American movie. Otherwise, I have no complaints. It’s interesting, in light of so many auteurist directors taking the possessive line, that The Godfather pictures have all borne the credit “Mario Puzo’s.” Coppola, and Paramount, knew, at least in 1972, that Puzo’s was the name (other than Brando’s) the millions of readers of the novel were looking for in those posters and advertisements.


57. Best American Screenplays 2 Sam Thomas, ed. (1991) Thomas edited three omnibus screenplay collections covering a wide range of genres. The second volume is the finest by a hair and includes My Man Godfrey, Citizen Kane, The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, Some Like it Hot, Terms of Endearment, The Lion in Winter, Julia and The Sting. Best American Screenplays (1985), the first volume includes of The Graduate, Sounder, Arthur and The Candidate and Best American Screenplays 3 1995 brings together The Godfather, The Godfather Part II, Sunset Boulevard, Tender Mercies, Double Indemnity, Harold and Maude and Unforgiven. Although some of these classics have since been published separately most have not, so this trio constitutes a vest-pocket library of great American scenarios.


58. Billy Wilder’s Some Like it Hot – The funniest film ever made: The complete book Alison Castle, ed; Interviews by Dan Aulier (Screenplay by Billy Wilder and I.A.L. Diamond) (2002)

When I was 15 I found a copy of the old Signet paperback edition of the Some Like it Hot screenplay in a second-hand bookshop. Reading it that afternoon, I quite literally fell off the family sofa. I had never read a funnier script before, and have only read one since that was as funny (Larry Gelbart’s play Sly Fox). Some Like it Hot was the favorite movie I’d never seen for years before I finally caught it at a university screening in the 1980s. It has since become my favorite movie, period. So you can imagine with what trembling anticipation I learned of this Taschen book, and how nearly orgasmic my pleasure on receiving it. The ne plus ultra of books devoted to a specific movie, this is a glorious package supplemented by interviews and limned by wonderful photographs and other graphics, with that great Wilder/Diamond screenplay at its center.


59. The Big Brass Ring: An Original Screenplay Orson Welles and Oja Kodar (1987)

In the years before his death, Welles was shopping this incisive political thriller around Hollywood, hoping to snare one of the then-biggest male stars (Robert Redford, Jack Nicholson, Warren Beatty) to take the leading role of William Blake Pellarin, a gubernatorial candidate treading dangerous lines of intrigue and obsessed by the young beauty with whom he once had an incandescent affair. While interested, none of the actors he sought would bite, using the excuse that they couldn’t afford to cut their price for a single movie (not even one to be directed by Orson Goddamned Welles!) when one suspects the thing that really unnerved them was the presence in the scenario of Kim Minnaker, the politico’s mentor, an ageing gay man fighting his own, unrequited desire for his old student. That would have been, and should have been, the Welles role, as the girl would have been his companion and collaborator Oja Kodar’s. Frustratingly, it was never to be; Welles died without a deal… which in Hollywood I suppose means you’re really dead. But his and Kodar’s screenplay is marvelous: Witty, erudite, intelligent and, in the sequence in which Minniker, riding a Ferris wheel outside Blake’s hotel, is stopped just outside the window where, in agony, he watches the younger man having sex with his beloved, incendiary. It’s a shocking moment and one can only imagine, with regret, what Welles would have done with it, both as director and as actor. If you’ll pardon my quoting from my own centenary essay on Welles, “In a moment as sexually charged as anything in American movies, Pellarin becomes aware of this scrutiny, and his eyes lock with Minnaker’s. The description of this emotionally naked encounter, in the published script, is among the most breathtaking I’ve ever encountered in dramatic literature; it should have burned holes in the screen.”


60. The Bonnie & Clyde Book David Newman & Robert Benton (1972)

No movie of the late-1960s aside from Midnight Cowboy (and, peripherally, The Wild Bunch, which wasn’t nearly as popular) had more of an impact on the American popular culture than Bonnie & Clyde, even if many Americans were unaware of them as the changes were happening. There was outrage at the form the picture took, seeming to be a comedy and abruptly exploding into bloody violence at mid-point, with considerably more to follow before the astonishing finale. The director, Arthur Penn, got much of the credit (and the blame) for the style, and certainly he and Dede Allen, the editor, were responsible for the movie’s electrifying kineticism. But so was Warren Beatty, who produced Bonnie and Clyde, starred as Clyde Barrow and hired everyone else involved, including Penn. (On the debit side, Beatty was also responsible for indications of Barrow’s homosexuality being removed from the picture.) But Bonnie & Clyde was a writer’s picture, or a writers’ picture, since it was entirely the product of two young men. Newman and Benton had been making a name for themselves as clever young Esquire magazine art directors and copywriters when they collaborated on the B & C screenplay and tried to get it made by François Truffaut. Beatty and Penn had enormous input into the original authors’ revisions to their script, and of course Penn was rightly praised for how he shot and, with Allen, edited the material. But Bonnie & Clyde is prima facie evidence against the idiotic American concept of all-movies-belong-solely-to-directors auteurism. Everyone contributed to the success of B & C, not only at the box office (when Beatty pressured Jack Warner to re-release it after a disappointing early run and it caught on the second time around) but in fashion, the honing of opinion among younger critics, the depiction of screen violence and the opening up of what was permitted generally in the most influential of the popular arts.

See also: Two for the Road Frederic Raphael (1967) Stanley Donen also got credit for the shattered temporal structure of this alternatively dark and charming romantic comedy, but the script was written that way from its inception. Raphael makes this abundantly clear in his introduction, and refutes with evidence the notion that Donen was in any way the progenitor of what, apart from the lovely starring performances by Audrey Hepburn and Albert Finney (and the nifty Henry Mancini score) made the picture so memorable. Herein lies a lesson for every TV-commercial wizard who slaps a possessive credit on his first, usually rotten, movie.


61. Casablanca: Script and Legend Howard Koch (and Julius & Philip Epstein) 1973 (Expanded edition, 1995) Although Koch was one of three credited scenarists on Casablanca, it was he who wrapped the published screenplay within his own reminiscence of its complex creation, filming, initial success and enduring popular repute. (Three years earlier he had done a similar job on The Panic Broadcast, a book reprinting his script, heavily doctored and improved by Orson Welles, for the phenomenal 1938 “War of the Worlds” broadcast, a publishing event about which Welles was none too happy.) The most important aspect of the Casablanca book, of course, is the Casablanca script, which despite its romantic excesses — courtesy of the un-credited Casey Robinson — remains one of the wittiest and most quotable screenplays ever written for an American classic.

See also: Casablanca: The 50th Anniversary Edition (1992) The Koch and Epstein screenplay sans Koch’s memoir.


62. The Citizen Kane Book Orson Welles and Herman L. Mankiewicz; Pauline Kael (1971)

Few essays on the popular arts were more widely read, and fewer created more unnecessary controversy, than Pauline Kael’s “Rising Kane” in The New Yorker, which she later made the centerpiece of her book publishing the original screenplay by Orson Welles and Herman J, Mankiewicz along with the cutting continuity of what was then being routinely called “the greatest movie ever made.” It’s a typically witty, informative Kael essay but filled with inaccuracies, particularly about Welles’s contributions to the script. (Among her sources was John Houseman, Welles’ one-time producer and later deadly enemy, who must have relished the opportunity to deny Welles writing credit for his most well-regarded picture.) Kael’s essay was so persuasive it even fooled the redoubtable Kenneth Tynan, up to then a lifetime Welles acolyte. What was curious about “The Kane Mutiny,” as Peter Bogdanovich wittily dubbed it in Esquire, is that Kael was also a strong public admirer of Welles’ work as a filmmaker, particularly at a time when most of the press was ignoring him entirely. It must have galled him that the screenplay he and Mankiewicz wrote was forever wedded to an essay hot to prove he didn’t deserve much credit for the writing. Kael’s piece is still worth reading, provided you know how to refute it, and that screenplay still well worth studying, in whatever format. The advantage of having the shooting script yoked to the continuity is that this allows you to confirm at a glance which lines and sequences were dropped, or altered by Welles and his Mercury Theatre actors, during the filming.


63. Greed: A Film by Erich von Stroheim (1979)

One of the great, mutilated masterworks, Greed was famously (or infamously) chopped down by MGM to 140 minutes from an 8-hour first cut by its writer/director, the genuinely visionary Erich von Stroheim. That Stroheim was extravagant is an understatement, but he was not foolish enough to believe a major Hollywood movie studio would release a picture of that length, although he (like Robert Altman later with his unrealized movie of E.L. Doctorow’s Ragtime and Claude Lanzmann with his overrated and exhausting 9-hour Shoah) wanted a two-part movie audiences would have to see in separate screenings. A 1999 Turner Entertainment “reconstruction,” which runs 239 minutes is, like the 1984 A Star is Born restoration, filled out with stills and is based on Herbert G. Weinberg’s coffee table book The Complete Greed, now quite rare. The Lorimer text, cited here, is a less profligately illustrated but more affordable means of judging what Stroheim had in mind. At least you should have an easier time getting your hands on a copy than you will finding the Turner Greed, for which, startlingly, there has never been a DVD release.


64. JFK: The Book of the Film – The Documented Screenplay Oliver Stone and Zachary Sklar (1992)

Prior to JFK, Stone was a media darling for the 1986 Platoon in spite of the fact that nearly all American newspapers and magazines pushed the Vietnam war until it became fashionable to condemn it, and the 1987 Wall Street, because everyone but a fiscal vulture can feel virtuous critiquing rapacious capitalism. Born on the Fourth of July didn’t hurt his media reputation either. But challenging the Warren Report? How very dare he? An early draft of the screenplay was leaked to the press while the picture was shooting, and the battle was on. Despite the nearly constant barrage of negative press, broadside reviews and colloquies by the usual talking heads condemning Stone, and his film, the picture took off into the stratosphere to such a degree that Congress passed The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 as a result. (Not that this has led to much of anything.) As a result of the false, hysterical claims against JFK, when they came to publish their screenplay Stone and his collaborator Zachary Sklar prepared a fully annotated edition which refuted many of the lies and much of the mythology the CIA-infiltrated American media still pushes on an increasingly credulous population concerning the very public murder of an American president.


65. The Magnificent Ambersons: A Reconstruction Orson Welles; Robert L. Carringer, ed. (1993)

Whenever I consider the violence done to what on the evidence was almost certainly Orson Welles’ masterpiece as a writer/director, I get physically ill. Not only because what still exists of Ambersons is so brilliant, or even because its mutilation savaged Agnes Moorehead’s still-astonishing performance, but because of the damage it did to its maker. “They destroyed it,” he once said, “and it destroyed me.” “They” is of course RKO, which used Welles’ being in South America at government request as an excuse to first disfigure his movie by removing more than 40 minutes from it and, later, after he’d been ousted from the studio, to obliterate the negative and even the preview print, leaving us an hour and 20 minutes of tattered glory beyond the means of rescue. Carringer’s book reconstructs the picture in verbal and visual terms (by the use of production stills) so that we can at least read what Welles intended. Much of the cut material appeared in script and still form in the earlier book This is Orson Welles but Carringer’s volume puts the whole thing together.


66. More About All About Eve Joseph L. Mankiewicz; Gary Carey (1972)

All About Eve is (or used to be) everyone’s favorite theatre fable, one of the wittiest and most quotable of American movies. Joseph Mankiewicz’s exceptionally literate screenplay was a natural for publication, and Random House brought out an edition of it in 1950. Two decades later Bantam reprinted it, supplemented by a long interview with Mankiewicz by Gary Carey. The script still shimmers, but Mankiewicz revised his interview responses to such a degree he removed all the air from his remarks, replacing spontaneity with fussy ponderousness. It’s a tendency he also had as screenwriter, cluttering things up with verbiage, and the reason I suspect he did not direct an original movie of his own after 1967; he had become what Orson Welles once called “a loquacious bore.”


67. The Ninth Configuration William Peter Blatty with Mark Kermode commentary (1999)

Another witty and endlessly quotable masterpiece, although far less well known than All About Eve. Blatty’s alternately hilarious and harrowing adaptation and revision of his novel Twinkle, Twinkle, “Killer” Kane is a nonpareil, filled with verbal slapstick and marvelous oddballs in its cast of characters. For the published screenplay, Mark Kermode leads the author on a journey through the picture, their commentary appearing alongside the text. Even if Blatty ends the picture by handing us yet another facile “proof” of life-after-death, the ride is so uniquely entertaining we can even forgive him for the sermon.

See also: William Peter Blatty on The Exorcist: From Novel to Screen (1974) Blatty was nothing if not sincere about his somewhat trying missionary zeal, and in this Bantam paperback he explicates that mission, along with the shooting script for his most popular movie. “William Friedkin’s The Exorcist,” my ass.


68. Nixon Oliver Stone and Stephen J. Rivele & Christopher Wilkinson (1995)

Having been burned by the corporate media on JFK, Oliver Stone was taking no chances with Nixon. He and his co-scenarists thoroughly annotated their published screenplay, including transcripts from the White House tapes and essays by some of the participants. The script, lavishly illustrated with stills from the picture, would be satisfying enough; the added weight of the documentary evidence makes the book a necessary volume in the expanding Nixon/Watergate libraries. I can never quite decide which Stone picture is my favorite, although I vacillate between JFK and Nixon, as I do between City Lights and Modern Times for Chaplin… and this is probably the first time the names of those two filmmakers have ever been yoked together.



69. Screenplays Volume II, The (The Collected Works of Paddy Chayefsky): The Hospital, Network, Altered States Paddy Chayefsky (2000)

Applause Books issued three Chayefsky collections in 2000: One for his stage plays and two for his screenplays. The second volume of movie scripts contained his best and most representative work, including the two on which his modern reputation rests. Although The Hospital is still a wonderful movie, I think a new Chayefsky may be required to, as Paddy did with the state of the medical monolith ca. 1970, satirize the way insurance and Big Pharma manipulate, rule over and generally destroy the lives and health not only of Americans but of nearly everyone on the planet. But while the contours of the news business have changed since 1976, Network retains its sting. Chayefsky was so prescient about televised news he was nearly an oracle; nearly everything he “predicted” in Network has come true in the decades since what MGM, hedging its bets, marketed as “a perfectly outrageous motion picture” was unleashed to the theaters.

See also: The Collected Works of Paddy Chayefsky: The Screenplays (Volume 1): Marty, The Goddess, The Americanization of Emily Paddy Chayefsky (2000)


70. Star Wars: The Annotated Screenplays (Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back, The Return of the Jedi) Laurent Bouzereau (Screenplays by George Lucas, Leigh Brackett and Lawrence Kasdan) 1997

Only a fool or an overstimulated fanboy would refer to the screenplays of the original Star Wars trilogy as great literature, or even great pop literature. But if you’re fond of the movies made from them, they’re great fun to read, and the annotations provided in this nifty volume are fascinating. As a maker of exceptionally thorough behind-the-scenes documentaries Bouzereau’s name has been nearly ubiquitous on DVDs and Blu-rays of many popular movies. He applies the same rigor and besotted intelligence here.


71. Hud, Norma Rae and The Long, Hot Summer: Three Screenplays by Irving Ravetch and Harriet Frank, Jr. Edited and with an Introduction by Michael Frank (1988)

Beginning with the Faulkner-inspired The Long, Hot Summer, Ravetch and Frank embarked on a career-long collaboration with the director Martin Ritt, resulting in eight pictures including the remarkably intelligent Paul Newman Western Hombre and Conrack, their adaptation of Pat Conroy’s despairing memoir of teaching shockingly impoverished Gullah children in South Carolina. Hud, of course, was one of Newman’s most identifiable roles (and the first Larry McMurtry novel adapted for the screen) while Norma Rae, based on the life and union activism of the late Crystal Lee Sutton, showed the moviegoing world that Sally Field was a major talent with a range far beyond what her earlier work (excepting the television “Sybil”) had led anyone to expect from her. The Norma Rae screenplay is perhaps the Ravetches’ most representative, filled with compassion, intelligence, humor, what used to be called “social consciousness” but which while passionate does not hector the viewer, and an impeccable sense of the dramatic. Who, having seen the picture, can forget the image of Norma Rae Webster standing defiantly atop the factory table with a hastily scrawled “Union” placard in her hands? And as a writer I treasure this exchange by the screenwriters between Norma and the textiles union organizer Reuben Warshawsky, portrayed by the wonderful Ron Liebman:

Reuben: You’re the fish I wanted to hook.
Norma: Well, you got me. So what the hell are you gonna do with me?
Reuben: Make a mensch outta you, kid.
Norma: You are?
Reuben: Mm-hm.
Norma:
(After a pause) What is that?
Reuben: Somebody who goes to the old folks’ home on Saturday morning instead of playing golf. Somebody who puts a dollar in a blind man’s cup for a pencil.
Norma: I’d do that.
Reuben: Uh-huh. But would you take the pencil?
Norma: Of course. I paid for it.
Reuben: Somewhere between logic and charity, there falls a shadow.

That, not boilerplate Democrat pieties dressed up in “dazzling” verbiage by self-righteous liberal dramatists, is what great screenwriting is all about.

See also: Three Screenplays by Horton Foote: To Kill a Mockingbird, Tender Mercies and The Trip to Bountiful (1994) Harper Lee remarked of Foote’s beautiful adaptation of To Kill a Mockingbird that he had “distilled the essence” of her novel. This is the most that can be expected of a writer transliterating the nearly perfect work of another, and the best that can ever be hoped. Foote was also, of course, a considerable playwright and screenwriter, and this collection brings together, along with Mockingbird, two of his own finest screenplays. And (not that this automatically confers honor upon them) all three of these scripts won Foote Academy Awards.


72. To Have and Have Not Jules Furthman & William Faulkner (1987)

As an adolescent I fell in love with the dialogue (and Bogart’s and Bacall’s performances) in this most entertaining of war-time escapist pictures long before I ever saw the movie, listening late at night in my bed to a local radio station’s airing of the 1946 “Lux Radio Theatre” broadcast, with an earplug (singular; this was the mid-’70s) but without, alas, Walter Brennan. Even though some of the repartee between Harry “Steve” Morgan and “Slim” Marie (“You know how to whistle, don’t you, Steve…?”) that so delighted me at 13 or 14 I later discovered was written by Howard Hawks, the picture’s director, the rest of what I was hearing was sharper and more intelligent than the 1940s norm. And although I have always loved Casablanca, I don’t love it as I do To Have and Have Not. There’s almost no fealty in it to the bitter, downbeat Hemingway novel, but that was the point; Hawks wanted to show how Marie and Harry might have met. The University of Wisconsin edition of the screenplay includes a splendid long introduction by the editor, Bruce F. Kawin, that delves deeply into the development of the script: The first pass was by the gifted but unpleasant Furthman, the second by Faulkner, and the polish by Hawks who, as so often his pictures, could have taken a screenwriting credit and didn’t. The running gag of Brennan’s Eddie asking everyone he meets if they “was ever bit by a dead bee” sounds like something Hawks might have devised, but it was Furthman who had the wit to come up with it.


Honorable Mention:

The 400 Blows François Truffaut and Marcel Moussy (1969) The Grove Press edition, packed with photos.
Abraham Polonksy’s Force of Evil: The Critical Edition Abraham Polonsky and Ira Wolfert (1996)
American Graffiti George Lucas and Gloria Katz & William Hyuck (1975) Another terrific Grove Press edition, later reprinted by Ballantine Books.
The Apartment and The Fortune Cookie: Two Screenplays Billy Wilder and I.A.L. Diamond (1971) One of Wilder and Diamond’s masterpieces, coupled with an amusing but much less effective script.
Apocalypse Now Redux John Milius and Francis Coppola (2000)
Avalon, Tin Men, Diner: Three Screenplays Barry Levinson (1990) Two of the most original pictures of the 1980s plus an overlong, sentimental movie memoir.
Baby Doll Tennessee Williams (1956) Williams’ notorious comedy of sex in the South, loudly condemned by the Catholic Legion of Decency and defiantly portrayed on a Times Square billboard a block long.
Brokeback Mountain: Story to Screenplay Larry McMurtry and Diana Ossana; Annie Proulx (2005) The original Proulx story and the beautiful film script adapted from it.
Charade: The Classic Movie Screenplay  Peter Stone (2015)
Chimes at Midnight Orson Welles (1988) A typically fulsome Rutgers Press edition with incisive accompanying essays and frame blow-ups.
Chinatown and The Last Detail: Screenplays Robert Towne (and the un-credited Edward Taylor) (1998)
Do the Right Thing Spike Lee (1988)
Double Indemnity Billy Wilder and Raymond Chandler (2000)
E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial: From Concept to Classic, The Illustrated Story of the Film and the Filmmakers (Screenplay by Melissa Mathison) (2002)
The Empire Strikes Back Notebook (Script by Lawrence Kasdan and Leigh Brackett) (1980)
A Face in the Crowd Budd Schulberg (1957)
Five Screenplays: All the President’s Men, Magic, Harper, Maverick, The Great Waldo Pepper William  Goldman (1997)
Five Screenplays: The Great McGinty, Christmas in July, The Lady Eve, Sullivan’s Travels, Hail the Conquering Hero Preston Sturges (1986)
Four More Screenplays: The Palm Beach Story, The Miracle of Morgan’s Creek, Unfaithfully Yours, Triumph Over Pain/The Great Moment Preston Sturges (1995)
Four Screenplays: Marathon Man, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, The Princess Bride, Misery William Goldman (1997)
The History Boys: The Film Alan Bennett (2006) It’s instructive to compare Bennett’s playscript with his screenplay, which I regard as both a splendid adaptation of a wonderful play, and an improvement on it. The moving final lines from Posner (Samuel Barnett) are a prime example of how Bennett deepened his own work for the screen.
How Green Was My Valley: The Screenplay for the John Ford Directed Film (Limited Edition) Philip Dunne (1990)
I Never Sang for My Father Robert Anderson (1970)
Irma LaDouce Billy Wilder and I.A.L. Diamond (1963) Midwood Tower was known for its erotica. Irma was about a prostitute. I guess that’s why they published this script, a slim volume teeming with terrific photos.
The Lion in Winter James Goldman (1969) Another splendid play improved on its way to the screen.
The Lost Weekend Billy Wilder and Charles Brackett (2000)
The Maltese Falcon John Huston; William Luhr, ed. (1995) A high-quality Rutgers edition.
Monkey Business/Duck Soup S.J. Perelman; Will B. Johnstone; Bert Kalmar & Harry Ruby (1972)
Monty Python and the Holy Grail (Book) Graham Chapman; John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones (1975)
Monty Python’s Life of Brian Graham Chapman, Graham; John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones (1979)
Nashville Joan Tewkesbury (1976) A wonderful book of a wonderful movie.
North by Northwest Ernest Lehman (1993) Another excellent Rutgers edition.
Platoon and Salvador Oliver Stone; Oliver Stone and Richard Boyle (1987)
Point of Order!: A Documentary of the Army-McCarthy Hearings Emile de Antonio and Daniel Talbot (1964)
Raiders of the Lost Ark: The Illustrated Screenplay Lawrence Kasdan (1981)
Robin and Marian James Goldman (1976)
The Shawshank Redemption: The Shooting Script Frank Darabont (1995)
Singin’ in the Rain Betty Comden and Adolph Green (1972)
Stalag 17 Billy Wilder and Edward Blum (1999)
Sunday, Bloody Sunday Penelope Gilliatt (1972)
Sunset Boulevard Billy Wilder and Charles Brackett with D.M. Marshman (1999)
Sweet Smell of Success Ernest Lehman and Clifford Odets (1998)
Talking in Pictures: The Making of the Movie Matewan John Sayles (1987) The script for Sayles’ great depiction of the Matewan massacre along with his account of filming it.
They Might Be Giants James Goldman (1970) Goldman’s lovely adaptation of his charming play.
The Third Man Graham Greene (1968)
Three Screen Comedies: Trouble in Paradise, The Shop Around the Corner, Heaven Can Wait Samson Raphaelson (1983) Three of the wittiest and most charming movies ever made, written for and directed by Ernest Lubitsch.
Three Screenplays: Daniel, Ragtime, Loon Lake E.L. Doctorow (2003) Only one of these was filmed (Daniel) but all of the scripts are worth reading.
Tom Jones John Osborne (1963) A wonderful Grove Press publication copiously illustrated with stills.
Touch of Evil Orson Welles (1995) Yet another great Rutgers edition.
The Treasure of Sierra Madre John Huston; James Naremore, ed. (1979) Rutgers again. A great film series that appears to have been either cancelled or suspended indefinitely. Perhaps too many screenplays were published in the ’70s, but almost none that aren’t owned by Disney are getting into print today.

Text copyright 2022 by Scott Ross

Rewritten, (almost) every line: “The Way We Were” (1973)

Standard

By Scott Ross

The Way We Were was so popular in its day, and is so warmly remembered by those who saw it when it was new, that the glow of memory has transmuted it into something it isn’t, and never was. Far from a great romantic drama, it is a potentially great romantic drama effectively sabotaged, mostly by the usual spineless obduracy of its director, Sydney Pollack.

Once upon a Hollywood time the producer Ray Stark wooed the playwright and screenwriter Arthur Laurents to concoct a project for Barbra Streisand. Laurents based his original treatment on a firebrand Jewish coed he’d known at college in the 1930s. Because he’d been impressed with the 1969 They Shoot Horses, Don’t They? the scenarist, to his everlasting regret, insisted that Pollack be their director. Pollack in turn wanted the lead male role for his pal Robert Redford. And thereby, as is said, hangs a tale.

As is plainly evident from the compelling novel Laurents published in 1972 based on his own original script, The Way We Were is Katie Morosky’s story. Hubbell Gardner, her goyische obsession (and eventual husband) is a supporting actor merely. Indeed, his charming emptiness is part of the point; their romance is doomed because Katie sacrifices her ideals for a beautiful, bright man who is, while politically astute, a passive, empty, uncommitted vessel into which she pours her romantic/erotic desires. And Katie’s political engagement is in the novel front and center, even when, as a Hollywood wife, she’s neglecting it.

The story works in the book in a way it never gets a chance to on-screen, where Redford’s involvement overbalances the narrative and Pollack, after a disastrous preview, panicked and cut nearly every political moment of importance, even shredding the climactic motivation for the dissolution of the Gardners’ marriage, as the pregnant Katie realizes her past has become a danger to her screenwriter husband’s present and offers to permit a divorce if they can just stay together long enough for her to deliver their child — a thing she couldn’t imagine doing in any other circumstance. By deliberately trimming these lines, and only these lines, of Katie’s, Pollack subverted the picture, and Streisand’s performance. But then, Pollack became well-known in Hollywood (perhaps as a result of The Way We Were) as a consummate writer-fucker.

Pollack, who when he appeared on the other side of the camera was a fine actor, as a director was little but a gifted hack who, early on, made a couple of good pictures (They Shoot Horses… and The Scalphunters) and later a few more (Three Days of the Condor, Tootsie and Absence of Malice) but whose work in the main is a catalog of mediocrity with a certain pictorial prettiness. He was not, to be charitable, what one could without laughing call a deep thinker. Unlike that other Sidney, the late and much lamented Lumet (himself once an actor) Pollack seemed not to have an analytical bone in his body, and very little narrative logic. I remember, in 1986, howling with laughter to hear him praising the Motion Picture Academy for its “courage” in decreeing his expensive Hallmark Valentine Out of Africa Best Picture of its year, as if the movie was some radical departure from the accepted norm instead of exactly and precisely the sort of big, swoony romantic pap upon which in those days the Academy habitually bestowed its imprimatur. Some well-respected filmmakers (Chaplin, Keaton, Welles, Lumet, Laurence Olivier, Elia Kazan, Martin Ritt, Blake Edwards, Carl Reiner, Mike Nichols, Roman Polanski, Elaine May, Sidney Poitier, Clint Eastwood, Gene Wilder, Warren Beatty, Kenneth Branagh and even Redford himself) were or are actors,* and the really good ones have a feeling for how to present other actors to their best advantage. Certainly these men (and women, if we include Streisand herself) are not known for sabotaging their stars’ performances as Pollack did to Streisand, not once but twice. The second instance was a sequence he cut in which Katie, driving on the UCLA campus, sees a passionate young girl agitating against the actions of the House Committee on Un-American Activities who both reminds her of her youthful self and stands as a living upbraid to her own increasing complacency.

Laurents knew he was in trouble when Pollack gushed that he had come up with the best romantic screenplay anyone had written in years, “and you’re a homosexual!” Due to his commitment to Redford, Pollack insisted that Hubbell be given equal weight with Katie thus (in my admittedly minority opinion) fatally compromising the project. When Laurents eventually walked away from his own film — directors who moan about having to do this should talk to a few of the writers they habitually drive to that extreme — Pollack ultimately brought on no fewer than 11 additional writers including some very fine ones like Alvin Sargent, Paddy Chayefsky, and Herb Gardner, only the first of whom would seem to have had any natural affinity for the material. Along the way someone (Sargent?), trying to resurrect the shreds of a character (poor Bradford Dillman’s) who, while peripheral in the book, at least has a presence there but who is nearly translucent in the finished picture, shoehorned in the movie’s most annoying wheeze: Hubbell and J.J. challenging each other to come up with “best”s. (“Best whiskey,” “Best year.”) As a recurrent motif it’s even more irritating than the sight of Streisand pushing Redford’s bangs across his forehead as if he was a little boy about to have his portrait photo taken, and equally as true to life.

Although it was probably cold comfort, considering the damage Pollack would ultimately do to his screenplay, once the director’s team of re-writers got through ruining the very script Pollack had raved about, Laurents was prevailed upon to return to the project, and was in a position to charge Stark & Co. through the nose for his continued participation. I like to think Laurents wrote Katie’s splendid rejoinder to Hubbell late in the movie, in the sequence at Union Station where supporters of the Hollywood Ten are attacked by shrieking McCarthyite conformists. The exchange highlights both the limits of Hubbell’s thinking, and the essential soundness, even if it sometimes lacks humor, of Katie’s:

Hubbell: I’m telling you that people — people are more important than any goddamn witch hunt. You and me! Not causes. Not principles.

Kate (Exasperated): Hubbell, people are their principles!

Or their lack of them.

Watching the Union Station sequence in 2020, the terrified mass in the movie that physically assaults the defenders of free speech (including, of course, the freedom of the attackers to oppose free speech…) is eerily and unsettling close to the equally ill-informed and frightened of today shouting into the faces of their fellow citizens for the unpardonable sin of not blindly obeying the edicts of governors, mayors and un-elected officials threatening them with arrest should they balk at slapping 95% ineffective pieces of cloth over their faces, whatever their reasons for failing to submit might be, including ill health, psychic distress or simple good sense. Plus ça change…

However butchered it was in the making, and bearing Pollack’s less-than inspired staging of most of its scenes, the picture still looks handsome, thanks to the sharp imagery, beautifully balanced color and unerring eye of its cinematographer Harry Stradling Jr., the splendid period production design by Stephen B. Grimes and set decoration of William Kiernan — there’s an especially nice touch at the beginning when Larry Parks’ name rather pointedly appears on a theatre marquee and Dorothy Jeakins’ and Moss Mabry’s subtle costume designs which perfectly re-create the sartorial look of the late ’30s, mid-to-late 1940s and early 1950s. The Oscar-winning score by Marvin Hamlisch struck me as bloodless in 1973 and seems even thinner now, particularly when I reflect that one of the composer’s direct competitors for the award was Jerry Goldsmith’s superb score for Papillon, and that among the non-nominated scores that year were Enter the Dragon (Lalo Schifrin), Scorpio (Jerry Fielding), The Thief Who Came to Dinner and Oklahoma Crude (both by Henry Mancini), Theatre of Blood (Michael J, Lewis), Cahill, United States Marshal (Elmer Bernstein), George Martin’s distinctly non-John Barryesque James Bond Live and Let Die and my own personal favorite of that year, Michel Legrand’s marvelous score for The Three Musketeers. The brief song Hamlisch composed with the lyricists Marilyn and Alan Bergman (and which soon became annoyingly ubiquitous) is, on the other hand, strongly and exceptionally plangent, although I have a quarrel with one of its essential lines:

“Memories may be beautiful and yet
What’s too painful to remember
We simply choose to forget
So it’s the laughter
We will remember…”

(©COLGEMS-EMI Music)

This, in my experience, is wholly incorrect. The memory of laughter fades; it’s the pain you can’t forget.

Laurents’ published novel (and, one presumes, the screenplay on which he based it) fleshes out all the characters. The movie flattens them. And as with the fabled night in Tootsie which Larry Gelbart said “would have to last a hundred hours,” Pollack’s sense of time is so imprecise that the movie Hubbell is hired to adapt from his own first novel seems to be taking years to write. Aside, to a degree, from Patrick O’Neal as Hubbell’s director, Herb Edelman as Katie’s New York radio producer and Viveca Lindfors as a character very like Salka Viertel (in whose literary salon most writerly emigres of the period congregated) no one else in the picture has a chance to land a performance, or even to make us aware of their existence. I suppose it’s a relief that the movie omits the sequence in which Katie, devastated by her unrequited feelings for Hubbell, lets her Young Communist League pal Frankie, who is in his turn in love with her, fuck her outside the gym on prom night. Yet without that rather terrible scene, we don’t understand why Frankie informs on Katie later. And since we never see James Woods again, I would bet most people who saw the picture didn’t even remember his character’s name, when all it would have taken was an artfully edited insert near the end to remind us. Pollack’s incompetence in these areas is often genuinely shocking; it’s as if, having stitched together so many writers’ scripts, he had no idea what he was shooting, and had to discover it in the editing, after he’d made a mess of things. Either that or he was so contemptuous of the audience he figured he could get away with any inconsistency or plot gap. It’s up to the stars to pull us in, and while Redford does what he can to make Hubbell matter, it’s really Streisand who holds the thing together.

Katie is so earnest, so (to use a word often applied to Streisand in her youth) strident, particularly at the beginning, that she could easily become unbearable. Her ironic attachment to Redford’s Hubbell softens her, but doesn’t turn her into a mindless twit. (Although it’s a mark of Pollack’s failure as a director that he never makes us aware, as Laurents does in his book, that despite Katie’s assumptions Hubbell’s family background is as lower-middle class as her own.) While both stars are too old to be believable in the long college flashback early in the picture — Redford was 36 in 1972 and Streisand was 30 — she carries it off better than he does. She also has a quietly devastating moment when, putting up the drunken Hubbell for the night she climbs into bed with him and he makes love to her, perfunctorily, as if he’s performing a ritual, like putting the cat out for the night. There are few things more dispiriting in the realm of sexual love than lying naked beneath someone you’ve adored forever and being grateful nearly to tears for what’s (finally!) happening while at the same time fully cognizant that he’s so wasted he can barely remember his own name, let alone yours. The emotions that pass over Streisand’s face during this sequence encompass everything Katie is feeling without for a second doing too much or pushing too hard for effect; they would do any actress proud, let alone one not, at that time, known for her abilities in drama. (And yet the Academy gave its award that year to Glenda Jackson, for an anemic comedy no one remembers.)

Streisand never quite forgets Katie’s passions, even, in the Hollywood section of the picture, when she’s less attuned to them. Hubbell quite rightly accuses Katie of humorlessness, although it’s impossible to imagine how she could have laughed off, as he suggests she should have, her public humiliation in the sequence where she speaks at the student strike for peace. And somehow Streisand even makes Katie’s masochistic yen for Hubbell less pathetic than merely heart-breakingly human, although the Jewish-girl-with-the-nose-pining-for-the-gorgeous-guy routine was wearing more than a little thin by 1973. She’d been doing it to death, and continued to for years when, aside from her voice and her comic touch, what her fans most loved about her was that she was different. We didn’t want her demure, or small-featured, or conventionally pretty. And if Katie’s early stridency makes her a bit of a pill, I still prefer it to that soft-toned, eye-batting and rather blatantly condescending manner Streisand adopts when she’s trying to sell us on her latest political kick, usually while also hawking a record album. At least Katie Morosky had the guts to call her listeners fascist.

Interestingly, it almost seems now as though there was never a time when the phrase “the way we were” didn’t exist. It’s given to very few writers to come up with a title, or a term, that defines a concept with such sharpness and clarity that it becomes an immediate and lasting part of the language. Fitzergald’s “The Jazz Age,” coined for an essay in 1931, instantly codified the decade he was so instrumental, with The Great Gatsby, in fixing in amber. And in the modern era, who, aside from that rapidly dwindling minority called readers even remembers that it was the then-young novelist Douglas Coupland who in 1991 created the term “Generation X”? In the same way, few now know that Arthur Laurents gave us our favorite clause to describe the loves and the mores of our youths. But because The Way We Were was a movie, and one which for all its flaws is both popular and enduring, at least more people know where his phrase came from. It’s not much but in what Gore Vidal aptly called The United States of Amnesia, surely that is something.

*I don’t include Woody Allen in this company because I would have to accept that he was, or has ever been, anything like an actor. Watch The Front sometime if you want proof of what a classic non-actor he is. Mel Brooks, likewise, was a comic personality, not an actor, And if Ron Howard is indeed “well-respected” as a director, it only goes to prove why those who value serious American movies live so close to despair.

Text (except for the Bergmans’ lyric) copyright 2020 by Scott Ross

Monthly Report: July 2020

Standard

By Scott Ross

Daisy Miller lobby card

Daisy Miller (1974) A lovely, little-seen adaptation by Peter Bogdanovich and Frederic Raphael of the Henry James novella.


Only Angels Have Wings - Arthur, Grant

Only Angels Have Wings (1939) One of the basic Howard Hawks pictures, and perhaps the most representative. The movie concerns a small air delivery firm in the Andes, operated by Cary Grant and Sig Ruman, that is barely holding on and embraces such Hawksian concerns as the relationships among its male crew (and between Grant and the worldly dame played by Jean Arthur who plunks herself into the action) and the value of professionalism. There are some marvelous sequences, both comic and dramatic, including a genuinely shocking mid-air plane accident, and Hawks (along with Jules Furthman, his credited screenwriter) largely and admirably eschews the sentimental. But also present are the niggling questions one almost always has about Hawks as a man who sneered at what he called “the flying boys” (read: “fairies”) while repeatedly limning the wonders of (completely heterosexual, of course) masculine love, and the desirability of whiskey-voiced women who act like men. And Hawks called his critics sick! With Thomas Mitchell, Rita Hayworth, Allyn Joslyn, Victor Kilian, Noah Beery, Jr. and, as a disgraced pilot seeking professional redemption, the splendid Richard Barthelmess.


Hour of the Gun - opening

The Earps and Doc Holiday in the opening. An influence on Sam Peckinpah?

Hour of the Gun (1967) An unusually intelligent look, by Edward Anhalt, at Wyatt Earp, Doc Holliday and the Clnatons starring James Garner, Jason Robards Jr. and the great Robert Ryan that also features luminous cinematography by Lucien Ballard and a superb score by Jerry Goldsmith.


The Parallax View - Beatty resized

The Parallax View (1974) The middle entry in the director Alan J. Pakula’s unofficial “paranoia trilogy” that began with Klute in 1971 and ended with All the President’s Men (1976) was both the most despairing and the least popular at the box-office, despite Warren Beatty as its star. Loren Singer’s 1970 novel concerned the suspicious deaths of multiple witnesses to a Kennedy-like Presidential assassination and the investigation by a reporter, who slowly realizes he’s on the kill-list, into a shadowy company called Parallax having something indeterminate to do with the murders. It’s very much a ’70s movie, in its concerns and in the approach by the filmmakers to the material, which includes a strange, lengthy film-within-the-film for the sequence in which Beatty is supposedly brainwashed. (It’s not the concept that dates the Parallax training film — surely we understand, almost a half-century later, how effective that process is — so much as the means by which Pakula and his cinematographer, the great Gordon Willis, create it.) David Giler and Lorenzo Semple Jr. wrote the sharp, intelligent adaptation, with an un-credited assist from Robert Towne (and, one assumes, Edward Taylor, his silent writing partner for four decades), Michael Small composed the eerie score, and the movie includes excellent supporting performances by Paula Prentiss, Hume Cronyn, William Daniels, Kenneth Mars, Walter McGinn, Kelly Thordsen, Earl Hindman and, in an effective cameo, Anthony Zerbe.


Oh, God - Burns, Denver

Oh, God! (1977) This bright, cheerful comic fantasy was one of the nicest surprises of 1977, and one of its biggest hits, even in the year of Star Wars. Its gentle humor, perfectly embodied in John Denver’s amiable central performance, is based on the impossibility of proving to the world the existence of what it most seems to want: An omnipotent deity. The director, Carl Reiner and his screenwriter, the great Larry Gelbart, in adapting Avery Corman’s 1971 novel wisely opted to make the Denver character not a Jewish reporter but more of an American Everyman. God in the Corman book was also not a little like The 2,000 Year Old Man, and Reiner even offered his pal Mel Brooks the role before, equally wisely, casting George Burns. Having resurrected himself from relative obscurity two years earlier in The Sunshine Boys, and winning an Academy Award for it, Burns seemed, then as now, the perfect choice. His God is one of understatement, supple wit and vaguely Hebraic show-biz origins, exposing phoniness without malice and overturning shibboleths with a wry smile.

The marvelous supporting cast includes Teri Garr as Denver’s flustered wife, Barnard Hughes as the bewildered judge in a legal case brought against Denver, George Furth as a disbelieving religion reporter, David Ogden Stiers as a district produce manager at the grocery chain for which Denver serves as a store assistant manager and who is mildly scandalized that the young man is not oiling his cucumbers, Ralph Bellamy as a well-appointed prosecution attorney, William Daniels as an officious grocery-chain executive, Rachel Longaker and the once-ubiquitous Moosie Drier as Denver and Garr’s children, and Dinah Shore as herself. (Reiner also shows up as a guest and does his hilarious imitation of Dorian Gray’s portrait.) The only false note is rung by Paul Sorvino as cross between Ernest Angley and Billy Graham; he’s funny, but so over-the-top he counter-balances the general believability of the other actors. But Jack Elliott composed a pleasing main theme, the cinematography by Victor J. Kemper is well-balanced, and Reiner’s direction brisk and un-cluttered. Revisiting this movie, which gave the agnostic me of 16 a great deal of joy, and finding it still fresh and charming (and very funny) was, for the atheist me of today, a distinct pleasure.


The Ballad of Richard Jewell
Richard Jewell (2019) A cautionary tale from Clint Eastwood whose message likely (and all too typically) fell on deaf ears.


The Eagle Has Landed

The Eagle Has Landed (1977) An intelligent but indifferently-mounted diminution of the excellent Jack Higgins thriller that ought to shame anyone who thinks the director John Sturges was anything but a modestly talented hack. Although he changed too much of what made Higgins’ original such a pleasure to read, Tom Mankiewicz later claimed that Sturges lost interest. Sturges himself said he only worked to earn enough for fishing, and the movie’s producer, Jack Wiener, later told the picture’s star Michael Caine that the director, who took off as soon as shooting was completed, couldn’t even be bothered to return for the editing. All of this shows in the finished product, which despite a good premise and a terrific cast, falls down repeatedly. The movie runs largely on the good will generated by its ingratiating stars (Caine, Donald Sutherland and Robert Duvall, the story’s nominal villains) and what dialogue Mankiewicz retained from the novel; even Lalo Schifrin’s score lacks punch. A waste.


The Boatniks lobby card

The Boatniks (1970) When I first saw it during the summer of my ninth year I didn’t know who Phil Silvers, Robert Morse or Don Ameche were, but this amusing Disney caper-comedy turned me into an instant fan of all three, along with Norman Fell, Wally Cox and Vito Scotti. It’s a trifle, a nothing, its scattershot gags at the expense of crazed Southern California would-be mariners sometimes over-broad and obvious. Yet it contains almost as many laughs for this jaded adult as it did for his easier to please pre-pubescent self. Although in my late 50s I am less enamored of Joe E. Ross’ glottal shtick, which fractured me in 1970, I am more able now to appreciate Morse’s sweet but fumbling innocence (his role here is the antithesis of J. Pierpont Finch; this picture might be sub-titled How to Fail at Command While Really, Really Trying) as well as Silvers’ patented chiseler persona and peerless way with a comic line, Ameche’s slow-burn and bursts of disbelieving outrage, Cox’s drier-than-dry-vermouth understatement, the brief but perfect bit by Al Lewis and Florence Halop as disgusted mates stranded on a sand-bar and the freckled prettiness of Stephanie Powers contrasted to the ethereal beauty of a girl called Midori as a Japanese pearl diver who is not all she appears. The script, by Arthur Julian, is often surprisingly smart even if his plot is standard-issue — the story was by Mary Roth — and Norman Tokar directed zestfully, if without any particular distinction. William Snyder’s color cinematography looks rather good today, Robert F. Brunner provided one of his tuneful, sometimes witty, scores and there are even some mild yet eyebrow-raising adult innuendos along the way. I date my love of seaports to this movie, and my youthful interest in the Coast Guard… at least until I realized it was part of the armed forces, which killed that dream pretty quickly.


The Comic (lobby card)

The Comic (1968) A good, although not great, collaboration between Carl Reiner (as director and co-author) and one of his old Caesar’s Hour colleagues, the writer Aaron Ruben, about a slightly repulsive silent movie comedian played, with remarkable dexterity, by Dick Van Dyke and based, one hears, on several comics of the era. As a character study it’s a bit too diffuse, and we sometimes aren’t sure whether we’re meant to laugh at the contemporary sequences. The silent comedy bits, however, are marvelous. They don’t re-create, or directly imitate, the work of any specific star of the teens and ’20s, but they capture, with superb timing and construction, and un-condescending good cheer, the spirit, and the joy, of those old comedy routines. The finale, which I think is meant to be moving, goes on too long yet feels inconclusive, and there’s a horrible sequence between Van Dyke as both the comedian and as his grown-up son that illustrates perfectly why Stonewall had to happen. (Pink cigarettes — now I ask you!) The opening sequence at the comic’s funeral, however, is a gem.


To Kill a Mockingbird - Peck, PetersTo Kill a Mockingbird (1962) The lovely adaptation of Harper Lee’s novel, whose qualities seem more impressive with the passing years.


All About Eve - Baxter, Holm

All About Eve (1950) The writer-director Joseph Le. Mankiewicz’s peerlessly witty comedy of Broadway manners.


Caesar’s Writers (1996) A reunion panel, sponsored by the Writers Guild, of Sid Caesar and most of the then-surviving members of those famed writers’ rooms for Your Show of Shows and Caesar’s Hour, along with the original Compass Players/Second City groups in Chicago the 1950s font from which the next 20 years of great American comedy sprang. Not surprisingly for any gathering, Mel Brooks tends to dominate, but both Neil and Danny Simon get in some good lines, the shows’ head writer Mel Tolkin (father of Michael) more or less presides, Carl Reiner has the best anecdotes, Sid himself demonstrates why he was such a pleasure to write for, and Larry Gelbart scores the evening’s best laughs. Michael Stewart and Selma Diamond were, alas, dead, and Lucille Kallen was unavailable, but Aaron Ruben, Sheldon Keller and Gary Belkin are also in attendance. This, by the way, is the full version of the panel; a briefer edition ran during PBS fund-raisers. To paraphrase the poster for Chaplin’s The Kid : Two hours of joy.


The African Queen - Hepbur, Bogart (resized)

The African Queen (1951) One of the earliest American movies to be shot extensively on location (Uganda and the Congo), a joyous collaboration between John Huston, Sam Spiegel, James Agee, Humphrey Bogart and Katharine Hepburn.


Rio Bravo - Nelson, Wayne, Martin

Rio Bravo (1959) In the otherwise laudatory capsule review in his movie guide, Leonard Maltin, while praising this quintessential Howard Hawks Western, complains of its over-length. I’m not sure what he means. How can a picture with no sags and no dull spots and which entertains you thoroughly from start to finish, even if it does run 2 hours and 21 minutes, ever be called “over-long”? Few movies I know are as genial, or as likable, as this one. Early in the picture Ward Bond, taking note of the team holed up in the jail and preparing to do battle against a killer’s ruthless brother, observes, “A game-legged old man and a drunk. That’s all you got?” John Wayne replies, “That’s what I got.” And as Hawks himself would doubtless have added, it’s all you need, if you’re good enough.


The Kid 22 - Coogan, Chaplin (resized)

The Kid (1921) Charles Chaplin’s first feature. If it’s slightly sentimental, and if poor Edna Purviance is required to emote melodramatically as the un-wed mother forced to give up her child, well… The tears are earned, Charlie is magnificently funny and little Jackie Coogan in the title role is still astonishing: The most beautiful child the movies had ever seen, and, as Chaplin whispered decades later to Coogan’s wife, a genius. If you don’t at least find the corners of your eyes a little moist when Charlie saves Jackie from the clutches of a pair of nasty social do-gooders, you may be beyond help.

Text copyright 2020 by Scott Ross

The fool in charge: Carl Reiner, 1922 – 2020

Standard

Inviting people to laugh with you while you are laughing at yourself is a good thing to do. You may be a fool but you’re the fool in charge. — Carl Reiner

By Scott Ross

For years now I’ve been maintaining a mental short-list of people who aren’t allowed to die. Unfortunately, the list is not preemptive; through no fault of my own, people keep falling off it: Jack Lemmon, Jerry Goldsmith, Larry Gelbart, Blake Edwards, Elmer Bernstein, Peter Ustinov, Miklós Rózsa, Billy Wilder, Alex North, Gore Vidal, William Goldman, Harlan Ellison, Toni Morrison, Barbara Cook, Hal Prince, my mother. So far, at least, Carol Burnett, Lalo Schifrin, Julie Andrews, Lily Tomlin, Sheldon Harnick, Maggie Smith, Mel Brooks and (especially) Dick Van Dyke are keeping faith with me. But recently that unconscionable rat Carl Reiner took his leave, which is just simply not cricket.

Actually, to live in decent health for 98 years, to remain compos mentos and in one’s own home, and to die in one’s sleep, is the consummation I suppose most devoutly to be wished by nearly everyone, and the most elusive; if there’s such a thing as a good death (and I think there is) that surely qualifies. But what a chunk of my life that man took with him! From what glories do we who worship talent and supplicate ourselves at the altar of comic genius bask in the reflective glow! If Carl Reiner had done nothing more than create, produce, write and for five glorious seasons guide that apotheosis of near perfection “The Dick Van Dyke Show” he would have more than earned his keep, not to mention the keep of at least another dozen.

I won’t append the phrase “like him” to that sentiment because there was no one remotely like him. Carl Reiner was a nonpareil. A one-off. A show-biz Renaissance (“Reinaissance”?) man: Actor, “writer without portfolio” (his own later description of himself in the Sid Caesar years), writer with portfolio, producer, director, novelist, playwright, screenwright, comedian. Even Mel Brooks, his closest contemporary (who not so coincidentally also happened to be his best friend) is less of a polymath, and not nearly as prolific: During the first year of the Van Dyke show — and remember, television seasons were much longer then — Reiner wrote 20 of the 30 episodes that aired; the following year he wrote 21 of 31. If any series can be described as one man’s work, “The Dick Van Dyke Show” was it.

The Dick Van Dyke Show - RoseMarie, Mary Tyler Moore, Morey Amsterdam, Dick Van Dyke

It was, perhaps, the show he was destined to create. As the writer-director Michael Mahler had Charles Kuralt observe in their 1994 appreciation “The Dick Van Dyke Show” Remembered unlike with any other television situation comedy of the time, when Rob Petrie walked through the door and called out, “Laura, I’m home,” we knew where he’d been, and what he’d been doing. And although Reiner himself was not an official writer on “Your Show of Shows” and “Caesar’s Hour,” let alone (as Rob was for Alan Brady) Head Writer, he’d spent hours in those famed writers’ rooms between 1950 and 1957, throwing out ideas and lines of dialogue, yelling to be heard over the din of raging egos and, when he was lucky or especially inspired, getting something into a sketch in which he would also likely be performing. (Reiner was regarded as one of the best second bananas in the business then; after the 2,000 Year Old Man exploded into the popular consciousness in the early 1960s, he became known as the best.) He knew in his bones how that competitive/collaborative process worked — even if the Brady show had a much-reduced staff of three — and how the various “types” collected there contributed to the assembling of a great variety show. And if Rob was Carl, more or less, it’s no secret that Buddy Sorrell was largely an older and more curmudgeonly Mel Brooks, and Sally Rogers an amalgam of Lucille Kallen and Selma Diamond. The Reiners, like the Petries, also lived in New Rochelle and also had neighbors called Jerry and Millie. While the Reiners had three children rather than one, and if Caesar was not the vain and dismissive, megalomaniac martinet Alan Brady proved to be… well, there has to be some fiction in a fictional series, hasn’t there?

Reiner wrote the pilot (“Head of the Family”) and the initial 13 episodes for himself, but Sheldon Leonard, the show’s eventual executive producer, thought Carl Reiner miscast, as himself. Having seen the pilot, I have to say he was right. Dick Van Dyke was a much better Carl Reiner than Carl Reiner. While both men are (oh, God… were!) charming — and Reiner was known to be a mensch — there is something inherently warm about Van Dyke that comes across without effort. Whatever indefinable alchemy informs these things, Reiner was a much more effective Alan Brady, a man with whom he had next to nothing in common, than he was a Rob Petrie. The “Head of the Family” pilot revealed Reiner’s creative cleverness, but not his comedic range. There is certainly nothing in it as hilariously memorable as Alan’s achingly funny confrontation with Laura Petrie over exposing his baldness on a television game-show in Bill Persky and Sam Denoff’s marvelous “Coast-to-Coast Big Mouth” episode: Piling his various toupées on top of his head while demonstrating their uses, literally growling into the telephone, using a Styrofoam head for a bongo and walking stiff-legged with his cane like a demented comic version of Everett Sloane in The Lady from Shanghai while grinning maniacally and shouting, “Oh, happy days are here again!” It’s a masterpiece in miniature, a comedic performance so touched with genius it practically levitates the television.

Coast-to-Coast Big Mouth - Carl Reiner as Alan Brady

What separates “The Dick Van Dyke Show” from the overwhelming rest of its sit-com rivals of the period is not merely the specificity of its show-biz milieu, the genuine affection between, and sexiness of, Van Dyke and Mary Tyler Moore or even the fulsome nature of the characterizations, both as Reiner conceived his ensemble and as he so brilliantly cast it. As either Jean Giraudoux or George Burns once noted, “The secret of success is sincerity. Once you can fake that you’ve got it made.” But the television comedy that lasts — or at least, lasted before the age of Larry David — is grounded in something more than humor. “All in the Family” confronted adult issues that no television show, and certainly no comedy, had ever dared touch. “M*A*S*H” (which the people involved were always quick to point out was not a sit-com) endured, and endures, because at its core were serious matters, addressed with as much honesty as hilarity. Even “I Love Lucy,” for all that we remember it best for its star’s often magnificently funny antics, was essentially about two people who however much they might have exasperated each other were also crazily in love. The Van Dyke show embodies something I think of as the comedy of embarrassment: These were essentially very decent people, and most of the humor around them sprang from their desire to be kind, to each other and to the world around them. Like benevolent reverse Basil Fawltys, they make a sticky situation worse by trying to make it better, or through an inability to let others down even when one or more of the characters (usually Rob) were being imposed upon. Their impulse to decency inevitably gums up the works. And that basic set-up springs from the godhead; the man who created those characters, and wrote those shows, was a human being.

The Dick Van Dyke Show - writer's room (Resized)

Richard Deacon, Dick Van Dyke, Morey Amsterdam and Rose Marie, 1961. (Photo by CBS via Getty Images)

And God, the show was funny. Even as a small, pre-kindergarten aged child, when I watched “The Dick Van Dyke Show” in morning syndication I knew, without really understanding much of the verbal humor, that I was seeing something special. The first episode that grabbed me, I remember, was the 1963 “The Sam Pomerantz Scandals,” and for reasons anyone who was once a child can understand: The Laurel and Hardy routine by Van Dyke and Henry Calvin. (I was also absolutely delighted by the “I Am a Fine Musician” musical number. I had never heard the word “piccolo” before, and I at first thought Mary Tyler Moore was singing “pickle loaf,” which I regarded then, and think of now, as a vomit-inducing gastronomic atrocity.) Coincidentally last winter I re-watched the entire series, as I do every few years, this time in the nicely remastered Image Entertainment Blu-ray set. Of 158 episodes, there are perhaps a half-dozen that are mediocre and two that are downright poor (“The Bad Old Days” and “The Twizzle,” both in Season One). That leaves 150 terrific shows and very likely more episodes that may be certified as classic than can be claimed by any other comedy series, including “The Mary Tyler Moore Show,” which probably comes closest to the standard of weekly excellence Reiner & Co. pioneered and describes a level of achievement almost unheard of in the world of television comedy.

Reiner himself was responsible for the two, to me, funniest moments of the entire five-season run: Sally’s reaction to Joe Coogan in “The Life and Love of Joe Coogan” (“Where’s this tall, good-looking, charming priest?!? you wanted me to meet?”) and the following exchange, from “Who Owes Who What?”:

Mel: Oh, is that the comedy spot?
Buddy (Pointing to Mel’s head): No, Bubblehead — this is the comedy-spot.
Mel: Rob!
Rob: Buddy—
Buddy: Sally!
Sally: Mel!
Mel: Rob!
Rob: Sally!
Sally: Buddy!
Buddy: Go ahead, Curly, it’s your turn. Say, “Rob.”
Mel: Rob!!!
Buddy/Sally (Simultaneously, applauding): Beautiful. / Oh, wonderful, wonderful.


Oh, God - Burns, Denver

Even though he was one of the stars of “Your Show of Shows” and “Caesar’s Hour,” Reiner didn’t see himself as someone an audience could believe might carry a variety show as Sid did, so for the first few episodes in which he appears as Alan Brady he’s seen, in increasingly elaborate set-ups, only from the back. Yet he was certainly becoming, by that time, an extremely familiar face to audiences, what with (aside from the seven years with Caesar) roles in the movies Happy Anniversary and The Gazebo (both 1959) and The Thrill of It All (which he also wrote) and It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World (both 1963). While his first two screenplays (Thrill and the 1965 The Art of Love) were, coming from him, steps backwards, appearing in The Russians Are Coming, the Russians Are Coming (1966) gave him greater visibility, and directing the movie of Enter Laughing (based on the Joseph Stein adaptation of Reiner’s own, very funny, autobiographical first novel, the screenplay for which he authored with the playwright, and that is really coming at a piece of material from both ends) brought him some cachet, leading to The Comic (1966) with Van Dyke; the often excruciatingly funny black comedy Where’s Poppa? (1970) with its infamous “tush-biting scene”; Oh, God! (1997) a lovely collaboration with his old Caesar compatriot Larry Gelbart that was almost shockingly successful at the box-office, even in the year of Star Wars; four projects with Steve Martin, beginning with the trivial and only fitfully amusing The Jerk (1979) and culminating with the blissfully funny fantasy All of Me (1984) co-starring a luminous Lily Tomlin.

All of Me - Reiner and cast

All of Me: Reiner, Victoria Tennant, Steve Martin, Lily Tomlin and Richard Libertini. (Photo by The LIFE Picture Collection via Getty Images)

Reiner was a great appreciator, and booster, of comic talent but couldn’t always launch a performer as successfully as he did Martin or Van Dyke. Reni Santoni, the star of Enter Laughing, didn’t exactly set the comedic world on fire (maybe because he was Spanish/Corsican and playing one of America’s most famous Jews?), nor did Robert Lindsay, for whom Reiner wrote and directed the flop Bert Rigby, You’re a Fool in 1989. And if I say that, Where’s Poppa?, Oh, God! and All of Me excepted, I don’t think Carl Reiner’s comedy film work in toto was as great as what he did on and for television or, with Mel Brooks, on recordings, don’t think I’m being dismissive; everyone concerned with the Van Dyke show knew it was a once-in-a-lifetime gig, and that they’d be very, very lucky if anything afterward was ever as good, or as much fun. And aside from Mary Poppins for Dick and “The Mary Tyler Moore Show” for Mary, nothing really was.

Just as I re-watch “The Dick Van Dyke Show” periodically, so too do I listen, usually about once a year, to the 2,000 Year Old Man recordings. Most comedy albums just make you smile after the first (or third, or 10th if it’s a classic) listening. The Brooks/Reiner collaborations are not merely perennially funny, they are gut-bustingly funny. Recorded with little advance preparation, and no scripts, they are vinyl evidence of two comedic genii flying, by the seat of their pants, into the stratosphere — the equivalent in comedy terms of Louis Armstrong improvising “West End Blues” or that astonishing held note by Miles Davis on the release of “Moon Dreams.” Reiner maintained that Brooks was never funnier than when he was panicked, and that not knowing what question Carl was about to throw at him pushed his nimble brain into those realms of inventiveness that leave listeners of these sessions breathless, with both laughter and dazzlement; it’s almost impossible to imagine a comedian’s mind working that fast. But our delight, and our appreciation, goes not only to Brooks but to Reiner. Without his impeccable sense of timing, or his probing (and, dare one say it, merrily sadistic) prompts, there’d be no comedy. We are listening not to a single brilliant man but to two, each riffing off the other’s words, anticipating each other almost telepathically: Laughter, without a net.

Mel Brooks and Carl Reiner, 1974. (Photo by Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images)

The style of the interviews was an outgrowth of Reiner and Caesar’s recurring Professor sketches on television and the albums featured encounters, not merely with the dapper bimillennial himself but with such immortal figures as the diet expert Dr. Felix Wheird; the head of Narzi Films, Herr Adolph Hartler; the Greek artist Mercurio Mercurochrome; the filmmaker Federico Fettuccine; Warren Bland of the L.M.N.O.P. ad agency; and from The New Technique Psychiatric Society, those sterling avatars of the psychiatric profession Drs. Havika ben Hollywood (pronounced “Hollavoo”), Buck Mitcheson and Sabu Panchali. I was just listening to that track again, doubled over in laughter at bits I’ve probably heard, and laughed at, a couple of dozen times. There were two fools on those sessions, equally in charge. Now there is only one. And he’d better stay out of a Ferrari, or any small Italian car. I can only take so much in one century.

This is probably the first time in 80 years Carl Reiner did something that didn’t get a laugh.

Text copyright 2020 by Scott Ross

Quarterly Report: July — September 2019

Standard

By Scott Ross

Home-viewing from The Armchair Theatre over the last three months; because there isn’t a single bloody thing in the cinemas worth the time, petrol, cash or personal energy it would take to go out. Although I will admit I was convinced by a friend to attend a special screening of Daughters of the Dust… thereby proving the point.


Tootsie Jessica Lang and Dustin Hoffman
Tootsie (1982) Take one vanity project for a notoriously self-involved actor (Murray Schisgal writing a screenplay about acting for Dustin Hoffman); mix with a separate script by Don McGuire concerning an out-of-work performer donning drag for a soap-opera role that borrows a bit too liberally from Some Like it Hot, even unto its blond object of affection and unwanted middle-aged suitors; add in re-writes by a small army of scenarists headed by the great Larry Gelbart and including, un-credited, Barry Levinson, Robert Garland and Elaine May; bake by a director widely known as one of Hollywood’s most notorious writer fuckers (Gelbart claimed the movie was stitched together from any number of scenarists’ drafts), and the result should have been a disaster. Instead, through some weird alchemy it not only wasn’t but somehow those ingredients contrived to blend so well the picture became a small classic of its kind. Revisiting Tootsie from a 35-year remove, it seems almost miraculous: A popular comedy that tickles the mind as often as it does the ribs. And the direction, by Sydney Pollack, never a favorite filmmaker of this writer, looks as good now as it did in 1982; whatever its internal flaws (including a series of consecutive events supposedly encompassing a single evening that Gelbart later wrote was “a night that would have to last a hundred hours”) the picture is strikingly lovely, with Owen Roizman’s sumptuous lighting and the crisp, witty editing by Fredric Steinkamp and William Steinkamp giving it a patina of warmth and sophistication, a rare combination for any movie comedy.

Hoffman’s “Dorothy Michaels” ranks as one of the great comic creations in American movies, yet the actor also locates the loneliness of the character — or, rather characters, since everything Dorothy says and does is filtered through Michael Dorsey’s brain and emotions — and an essential sweetness and decency Michael himself lacks when he’s wearing pants.* As the unwitting object of Michael’s interests, Jessica Lange was a revelation in 1982, lightness and gravity in balance, and what she does is still astonishing in the sheer rightness of her every glance, inflection and wistful hesitation. Terri Garr is no less entrancing, in what is surely her best screen performance, and Bill Murray gets the picture’s best lines as Michael’s playwright roommate. (May created the character, and wrote his speeches.) Against his own wishes, Pollack took on the role of Hoffman’s agent, and their scenes together, reflecting some of the very real anger and frustration each felt toward the other, are among the movie’s comic highlights. The wonderful supporting cast includes Dabney Coleman as the sexist television director, Charles Durning and George Gaynes in the Joe E. Brown role(s), Doris Belack as the savvy “daytime drama” producer, Geena Davis as a nurse in the soap-within-a-film’s fictional hospital, and the late Lynne Thigpen as the show’s floor manager. Dave Grusin, who often floundered when composing for dramatic pictures, wrote for Tootsie one of his most felicitous comedy scores. It isn’t funny in itself, nor does it try to be; its alternate airs of peppy urbanity and plangent emotionalism make for a perfect juxtaposition that reflects the plot’s development and moods without attempting either to compete with them, or to ape the action.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
* Hoffman based Dorothy’s soft Southern vocal mannerisms on those of his friend Polly Holiday.


They Might Be Giants - finale

George C. Scott and Joanne Woodward in the movie’s radiant, moving final moments.

They Might Be Giants (1971) James Goldman has long been one of my favorite writers. While nowhere near as prolific (nor as well known) as his brother William, his smaller output includes the 1965 play and subsequent movie 1968 The Lion in Winter (for which he won an Academy Award); the beautifully compressed book for the landmark Stephen Sondheim/Harold Prince Follies, arguably the single greatest theatrical musical of the 20th century; the wonderfully conceived and unexpectedly moving Robin and Marian (1976); a superb novel about King John, Myself as Witness, in which Goldman re-examined an historical figure he felt he had maligned in his previous writing; and the play on which this lovely picture was based and for which he wrote the perfectly structured adaptation. Hal Prince produced the play’s only major production in London, later castigating himself for hiring the wrong director (Joan Littlewood) for the piece, although Goldman himself said he was unhappy with the script, which he subsequently withdrew from further production. The movie, while disappointing financially — presumably those involved expected another Lion in Winter — is a blissful variation on Arthur Conan Doyle, in which a mad retired jurist (George C. Scott) called Justin Playfair, who believes he is Sherlock Holmes, is examined by a psychiatrist (Joanne Woodward) named Mildred Watson. They meet as antagonists, form an uneasy alliance and drift toward romance, while Playfair seeks a rendezvous with the elusive Professor Moriarty. It may sound twee, and there are many on whom its gentle charms are no doubt lost, but it’s a funny, and surprisingly emotional, rumination on the relative insanity of a brilliant, harmless paranoid and of the increasingly mad society to which he is expected to conform. That last notion no doubt seems trite, but it has seldom been handled with such deftness and wit. Anthony Harvey, who also directed The Lion in Winter, shot the picture with a nervy energy that captures the New York City of the early 1970s, not as if under glass but as a living stage for Playfair’s intrigues.

Scott and Woodward tear into their roles with the relish of great actors who know in their bones they’ve got their hands on some of the choicest dialogue around, and the rich supporting cast includes Jack Gilford, Al Lewis, Rue McClanahan, Theresa Merritt, Eugene Roche, James Tolkan, Kitty Winn, Sudie Bond, Staats Cotsworth, F. Murray Abraham, Paul Benedict, M. Emmet Walsh and Louis Zorich. There’s also a brief but extremely effective chamber score by John Barry, arranged and augmented by Ken Thorne. Two home-video versions exist: One (a Universal Vault DVD) running under 90 minutes, reflects the theatrical release while the other, the television edit (on Blu-Ray from Kino Lorber) is longer, and includes the wry, delightful extended sequence in an immense Manhattan grocery store. It could, I suppose, be argued that the story doesn’t need the grocery sequence, and the climax plays well without it. But it also seems to me that the movie is enriched by its inclusion, and diminished by its excision. So, caveat emptor.

Dr. Mildred Watson: You’re just like Don Quixote. You think that everything is always something else.

Justin Playfair: Well, he had a point. ‘Course, he carried it a bit too far. He thought that every windmill was a giant. That’s insane. But, thinking that they might be, well… All the best minds used to think the world was flat. But what if it isn’t? It might be round. And bread mold might be medicine. If we never looked at things and thought of what might be, why we’d all still be out there in the tall grass with the apes.


Daughters of the Dust_Trailer

Cora Lee Day as Nana Peazant

Daughters of the Dust (1991) Julie Dash’s dreamlike evocation of Gulla society on a small South Carolina island in the early years of the 20th century was well-received critically but not a box-office success. 20/20 hindsight by knee-jerk commentators now has it that the picture was badly handled by its distributor because its writer-director was not only a woman, but a black woman. Yet I don’t see how this luminously photographed exercise in non-linear rumination could have been a popular success in any era: It’s so diffuse it seems less Impressionistic than merely undefined; we can scarcely tell what the various narrative threads are, much less what they mean. What’s best about the picture, aside from Arthur Jafa’s exquisite cinematography, are the wonderful faces of the expressive actors, especially those of Cora Lee Day as the family matriarch clinging to her African roots and religion, Cheryl Lynn Bruce as her overly-devout Christian granddaughter, and Barbara-O as her mirror opposite, a wayward young woman who left the island for a man but who now is involved with a younger woman. But 60 minutes into this hour-and-52-minute glorified student film my eyes had long since begun to glaze over and even those interesting faces weren’t enough to clear them.


The Last Hard Men - Heston and Coburn

The Last Hard Men (1976) A tough, bloody Western from an unsparing Brian Garfield novel, starring Charlton Heston and James Coburn as old antagonists on a collision course. Although (unlike in the book’s ending) the movie’s climax seemingly leaves his character’s survival in doubt, and while the actor was too young for the role — as Garfield wrote it, the former lawman is in his 60s, and becoming increasingly frail — Heston is quite a good match for the ruthless Coburn, and the filmmakers (Andrew V. McLaglen was the director, and Guerdon Trueblood wrote the script) don’t flinch from the story’s most horrific moment, when the Heston figure’s daughter (Barbara Hershey) is gang-raped by Coburn’s team of escaped prisoners. The role of Hershey’s earnest suitor is the sort of part the young Jeff Bridges could have turned into a third lead by doing almost nothing, and while Chris Mitchum is attractive, he’s completely out of his depth; as an actor he was never much more than the pretty son of a movie star. While the performance of Michael Parks, as the sheriff who accompanies Heston on part of the quest to retrieve his daughter, suffers from his role being less interesting than in the Garfield book, the actors playing Coburn’s gang (Jorge Rivero, Thalmus Rasulala, Morgan Paull, Robert Donner, Riley Hill and especially Larry Wilcox and John Quade) are an impressively frightening bunch and Duke Callaghan’s widescreen cinematography is lustrous. Leonard Rosenman composed a terse, uncompromising score (it was later made available on CD) which was then replaced by a collection of newly-recorded cues from several of Jerry Goldsmith’s  previous 20th Century-Fox titles 100 Rifles (1969), Rio Conchos (1964), Morituri (1965) and the 1966 Stagecoach. I assume this was due to their being more traditional action cues and Western pieces than Rosenman’s dark, brooding compositions. But while they are splendid in themselves, if you’re already familiar with them from their sources they’re a needless distraction.


Invisible Monster titcd

The great title card for one of “Jonny Quest”‘s creepiest episodes. If only the animation for the show had been this good!

“Johnny Quest: The Complete Original Series (1964 – 1965) When I was a child the Saturday morning re-airings of this 1964 one-shot, an impressive attempt by Joseph Barbera and William Hanna to create and direct a weekly prime-time animated adventure series,‡ made an enormous impression. It was the first “serious” animation I’d ever seen, its often eerie plot-lines were, for a 5-year old, fascinatingly scary… and in the titular figure, the irrepressible blond-topped All-American Jonny, lay my first big crush.† The gifted comics artist Doug Wildey designed the show and its central cast: Plucky Jonny, his slightly mystical adopted Indian brother Hadji, father Benton Quest and bodyguard Race Bannon (who, white hair aside, was, somewhat confusingly for me, almost a dead-ringer for my own father). Produced in the so-called “limited” format pioneered by Hanna-Barbera, and which Chuck Jones astutely referred to as “illustrated radio,” the series, re-viewed from an adult perspective, contains highly variable animation; there are times when the characters are beautifully drawn, while at others they are remarkably poorly drafted, and this older viewer could certainly do with less of Jonny’s annoying little dog Bandit. But the stories are nearly always, despite a 26-minute limitation, well-plotted and exciting, often with an agreeable avoidance of earthly explanation for seemingly supernatural phenomenon. Children, like many of their adult counterparts, love to be frightened, and they especially love ghost stories and impossible monsters; it was a consistent reliance on rationality than killed my initial enthusiasm for the later H-B “Scooby Doo, Where Are You?”

Among the pleasures of the series were, and are, the voices, especially the appealing Tim Matheson as Jonny, the undemonstrably masculine Mike Road as Race, the charming Danny Bravo — who seems to have based his vocal characterization on Sabu — as Hadji, Vic Perrin as the show’s recurring villain Dr. Zinn and occasional guest artists such as Keye Luke, Jesse White, J. Pat O’Malley and even, astonishingly, Everett Sloan as an unrepentant old Nazi. Hoyt Curtin’s superb main title theme, with its bracing mix of big band and James Bond, is another asset; most of the incidental music is his, with additional and uncredited compositions by Ted Nichols. Many of the series’ best (and creepiest) episodes were written by William Hamilton: “The Robot Spy,” “Dragons of Ashida,” “Turu the Terrible,” “Werewolf of the Timberland” and “The Invisible Monster.” Among the others of especial note are “The Curse of Anubis” (Walter Black), “Calcutta Adventure” (Joanna Lee), and “Shadow of the Condor” and “The House of Seven Gargoyles” (both by Charles Hoffman). The recent Warner Archives Blu-Ray collection, while it contains few extras, looks terrific.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
† Like “Top Cat” and “The Jestsons,” “Jonny Quest” lasted only a single prime-time season. But when you’re a child, you’re not counting episodes, and due to repeated Saturday morning re-airings all three shows seemed to run forever.

‡How typical of me that my first big crush would be not another boy but a cartoon character… Still, I don’t know whether it was so much that I was attracted to Jonny as that I longed to be him. And isn’t hero-worship often what early same-sex crushes amount to?


Klute - Fonda and Sutherland (Klute comforts Bree)

Klute (1971) The truly chilling paranoia thriller starring Donald Sutherland and Jane Fonda, who as the call-girl Bree Daniels gives what I consider the finest performance by an American movie actor of the last 50 years.


In the Heat of the Night - Sidney Poitier, Jester Hairston and Rod Steiger

Rod Steiger, Jester Hairston and Sidney Poitier

In the Heat of the Night (1967) This tense, unblinking police procedural coated in a patina of social critique was one of the great successes of its year, which also saw the premier of Bonnie and Clyde. And while the picture is very much of its time in its examination of racist bigotry in the then-current American Deep South, it’s also a brisk, exciting detective thriller that holds up remarkably well, not least due to the crisp direction by Norman Jewison and to the picture’s precise Stirling Silliphant screenplay. Indeed, I prefer Silliphant’s creative adaptation to John Ball’s original novel, in which race is an important component, yet is less central to the narrative’s tensions than in the much bolder, angrier, movie, especially via the incendiary central relationship between Sidney Poitier’s Virgil Tibbs and Rod Steiger’s Chief Gilliespie. It should be remembered that the picture was in release only three years after the murders of Goodman, Chaney and Schwerner, and the sense of dangerous rot and slowly simmering violence Jewison captures onscreen is as palpable as the oppressive, humid heat of its Mississippi setting. (Although most of it was  shot in the southern Illinois town of Sparta.) Poitier gives a performance of wit, implacable inner strength and fierce integrity. There are a number of moments in the picture where what we see in a character’s face is more revealing, and quietly powerful, than what is said. Poitier has one such scene, when Steiger dismisses him, and his assistance in the murder investigation. Perhaps the most difficult thing an actor can do is to allow us to see him thinking. Too many actors project thought in those moments, and it’s nearly always phony. With Poitier, the impact registers itself in, first, his disbelief, followed by his fury, and, finally, a soft, subtle smile. He gets it; he’s been here before. Yet none of what we see is obvious, or overdone.

Lee Grant, as the widow of the murder victim, has a similar scene where, shocked into silence by the news of her husband’s death, she reacts against Poitier’s gentle attempt to seat her with an anguished, rigid gesture that slowly turns to acceptance and, more potently, the need to be comforted. It’s devastating to watch. As the racist sheriff, Steiger, at the height of his screen prowess, meets his co-star blow-for-blow. Gillespie is as much an outsider in the town as Virgil, and as distrusted by the locals. His tension is coiled deep, and he expresses that inner explosiveness in the way he compulsively chews gum, stopping only when he has something to say, or when comprehension breaks through his consciousness. The supporting roles are so perfectly cast they seem inevitable — absolutely real: Warren Oates as a patrolman with a secret; Larry Gates as  a smooth and powerful old racist; the usually genial William Schallert as the bigoted mayor; Beah Richards as the local abortionist; Quentin Dean as a white-trash slut; Anthony James as a smirking creep; Scott Wilson as a prime suspect in the killing, whose changing relationship to Virgil is far warmer than what transpires between Tibbs and Gillespie; and Jester Hairston as an Uncle Tom butler outraged by Tibbs slapping his employer. (If you look sharp, you’ll also see Harry Dean Stanton as a cop.) That slap was a blow for liberty, and must have resounded sharply in many places across the globe, not merely the Southern United States. The dark, expressive cinematography is by Haskell Wexler — cheated by the constricted budget of a crane, he and Jewison make frequent, and often very effective, use of zoom lenses. Hal Ashby provided the fluid editing, and Quincy Jones’ score, mixing jazz and blues, has a nervous, funky energy perfectly in keeping with the movie’s sense of dark foreboding, and he composed a terrific main title song (with lyrics by Marilyn and Alan Bergman) that’s sung with passionate soul by Ray Charles. Jones’ cue for Wilson’s attempted escape (and suggested by Jewison) is a highlight, puttering out expressively as the murder suspect realizes he’s licked — the musical equivalent of a runner who’s out of breath.


Ghostbusters1984_45

Ghostbusters (1984) Horror comedy was far from a new concept when Ghostbusters was made — Harold Lloyd starred in something rather redundantly called Haunted Spooks in 1920 — but until 1981 and An American Werewolf in London there had never been one with elaborate special-effects, and even that was modestly budgeted; Ghostbusters cost six times as much (its budget was between $25 and 30 million.) Most of its predecessors tend to be either comedies with a few ghostly appurtenances (cf., Bob Hope’s The Ghost Breakers, Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein, Young Frankenstein and Don Knotts’ The Ghost and Mr. Chicken) or genuine horror with black comedy overtones (The Abominable Dr. Phibes, Theatre of Blood, Phantom of the Paradise and, indeed, American Werewolf in London) but Ghostbusters takes nothing seriously. Its writer/stars, Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis, see everything as funny, and since The Ghostbusters themselves seldom panic, we spend the entire movie in a state of amused relaxation right along with them; the audience takes its cue from laid-back smart-ass Bill Murray’s Peter Venkman, for whom the entire natural world is a sardonic joke, so why should the supernatural world be any different? Murray’s comic persona is so relaxed he’s like a more sarcastic version of Bing Crosby.

The picture is inconsequential — you smile through most of it, even if you seldom laugh out loud — yet at the same time memorable; several of its set-pieces, phrases and gags became instant cultural touchstones, and after seeing the movie you’ll likely never look at a bag of marshmallows the same way. Sigourney Weaver has a good, serio-comic role as the woman whose apartment is being taken over by an ancient deity, Rick Moranis is sweetly oblivious as a dweeby neighbor, Annie Potts is the Ghostbusters’ preternaturally un-fazable secretary, William Atherton is an officious prick from the EPA (why do so many satires go after EPA rather than corporate polluters?) and Ernie Hudson gets a largely thankless role as the token black member of the team. László Kovács shot the movie beautifully, and the veteran Elmer Bernstein composed a score that, anchored to a loping main theme, was almost too effective: Despite his having composed in his long career everything from epics (The Ten Commandments) and Westerns (The Magnificent Seven) to thrillers (The Great Escape) and intimate dramas (To Kill a Mockingbird) and in every conceivable format from symphonic to jazz, the success of Airplane!, The Blues Brothers, An American Werewolf, Trading Places and Ghostbusters got him typecast for years as purely a comedy composer.


Touch-of-Evil-7-e1382097512115-940x460

Touch of Evil (1958) Orson Welles‘ minor masterpiece, and the last time he was permitted the luxury of the studio system’s largess.


the_pink_panther_blake_edwards_and_peter_sellers_on_the_set_of_the_return_of_the_pink_panther

The Pink Panther (1963)
A Shot in the Dark (1964)
The Return of the Pink Panther (1975)

The Pink Panther Strikes Again (1976)
Revenge of the Pink Panther (1978)
The Trail of the Pink Panther (1982)

How Blake Edwards took his love for silent comedy routines deep into the post-War pop consciousness.


Chinatown_091pyxurz1

Chinatown (1974) The modern classic by Robert Towne and Roman Polanski.


Beetlejuice

Beetlejuice (1988) I misunderstood Beetlejuice when it was new; my contemporary review (fortunately now lost to the landfills) betrayed a certain — and to me, now, inexplicable — inability to keep pace with Tim Burton’s patented blend of amiability and dark comic outrage. It wasn’t that I couldn’t appreciate his often exhilarating blend of comedy and horror; the Large Marge sequence in Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure made me laugh so hard I nearly fell out of my seat. But I somehow wasn’t ready for an entire feature with that sensibility, unfettered. Revisiting Beetlejuice now, as I feel compelled to do every few years, I can’t help wondering why my younger self couldn’t relax enough to embrace such a cheerfully anarchic comedy as this one. Written by Michael McDowell (sadly, one of all too many creative men who succumbed to AIDS) and Warren Skaaren (also now prematurely dead, of bone cancer) from a story by McDowell and Larry Wilson, it’s a spook-fest for jaded children, a supernatural comedy that stints neither on the humor nor the paranormal.

As the nice young Connecticut couple who discover they’re dead and doomed to live with the wacko modern artist and her bourgeois real-estate developer husband they can’t scare away, Alec Baldwin and Geena Davis embody the spirit of the whole enterprise; they’re too sweetly gentle to make decent ghosts. As the titular “bio-exorcist,” Michael Keaton was a revelation, and his performance still amazes; nothing he’d done in movies up to that point had prepared us for the primal forces he unleashed in himself as Beetlejuice. His non-stop patter, loopy asides, gross-out wit and sheer brazen crudity were like nothing we’d seen in a movie comedy before. I think you’d have to imagine how movie audiences reacted the first time they saw the Marx Brothers to understand the impact that performance had on us in 1988. The strong supporting cast includes a very young Winona Ryder as the developer’s slightly off, death-obsessed teenage daughter; the peerlessly self-satisfied Jeffrey Jones as her father; the ever-treasurable Catherine O’Hara as his nasty, pretentious wife; Sylvia Sidney, in her of her final performances, as Baldwin and Davis’ case-worker, making the most of a role that is really little more than a delicious sick joke; Glenn Shadix as an obnoxious interior designer§; and Dick Cavett as a blasé society snob. Danny Elfman composed one of his brightest early scores, which deftly incorporates some of Harry Belafonte’s calypso hits. The first time I saw Beetlejuice, the use of “Day-O” offended me; now that sequence strikes me as one of the happiest in the picture. That’s one of the perks of revisiting old movies: Realizing that it wasn’t the original, uncategorizable, picture that was to blame for your dismissal of it, and being happy that you’ve lived to become a person who can surrender himself to it.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
§ Although Shadix’s performance struck me at the time as an exercise in extreme stereotype, the actor was himself gay.


The Seven-Per-Cent Solution - Duvall, Arkin, Williamson watch

The Seven-Per-Cent Solution (1976) Nicholas Meyer’s ingenious Sherlock Holmes pastiche.


Blackbeard's Ghost - Ustinov and Jones

Blackbeard’s Ghost (1968) I don’t know how I missed this one when it was released, as I habitually saw every new (or newly reissued) Disney movie, animated or live-action. It’s just possible it didn’t make it to the small Ohio town we were living in then, although every other children’s movie of the time did. In any case, I only discovered it when I came across the Disneyland soundtrack album — receiving the record for Christmas of 1970, I nearly wore it out through re-playing. It was my introduction to Peter Ustinov, who narrated it, and who starred as Blackbeard; the LP featured dialogue, mostly between him and Dean Jones, with a little Suzanne Pleshette shoehorned in, and I was entranced by Ustinov’s idiosyncratic way with a funny line, his ineffable charm, and (to borrow a phrase from Harlan Ellison in a different context) the “ineluctable rodomontade” of his florid verbiage. As I grew older and became more familiar with Ustinov, and with his performances and his work as a playwright and screenwriter, I began to suspect that he had re-written the Blackbeard script (or at least, his lines) as he had on Spartacus. And if you love Ustinov as I do, Blackbeard’s Ghost, while silly, generates a lot of laughter.

Although basing their screenplay on a very good children’s novel by Ben Stahl, in which two boys accidentally conjure up the shade of the pirate, still very much the bloodthirsty ghoul of legend, the movie’s writers (Don Da Gradi and Bill Walsh) ditched that premise in favor of pure comedy, making this far tamer Blackbeard’s more-than-reluctant compatriot the new coach of a hopeless college track team. That the coach is played by Jones is a help; whatever criticisms might be levied at the Disney pictures in which he starred, the actor (on whom I had a slight childish crush) always brought enormous conviction to them, and his outbursts of incredulous anger are as ingratiating as the engaging grin that occasionally splits his handsome face. The slapstick in the picture, directed with no special distinction by Robert Stevenson, is sometimes dopey and occasionally better than that, and the invisibility effects by Eustace Lycett and Robert A. Mattey are, as usual with Disney, well done, as are the lovely background matte paintings by Peter Ellenshaw. The screenplay has a pleasing lightness, enriched by what I again assume were Ustinov’s additions. The laughter the Disney Blu-Ray drew from me was considerable, even if nearly all of it was generated by Ustinov, who still makes me roar at lines I memorized off that record album when I was nine. Although Elliott Reid overdoes his bit as a television sportscaster, Pleshette is, as always, simultaneously biting and adorable as Jones’ inamorata; Joby Baker makes a good showing in the unaccustomed role of the villain; Elsa Lanchester gets a good scene or two as Jones’ dotty landlady; Richard Deacon is amusingly dry as the college dean; and Herbie Faye, Ned Glass, Alan Carney and Gil Lamb all have good bits in Baker’s restaurant-cum-gambling den. The plot revolves in large part around Blackbeard’s old home, maintained as an hotel by his descendants, little old ladies with nothing else to cling to. I mention this because one of them — and I have no idea which — is identified on the imdb as Betty Bronson. That’s a name more forgotten now than it was 50 years ago, but 45 years before, that Bronson was enchanting youngsters as the screen’s first Peter Pan. I would like to think that Walt Disney, one of whose final productions Blackbeard’s Ghost was, knew that, and gave the old trouper a job. Anyway, it would be pretty to think so.


INTO THE WOODS

Anna Kendric sings “On the Steps of the Palace,” my favorite number in Stephen Sondheim’s dark/light score. “He’s a very smart Prince / He’s a Prince who prepares / Knowing this time I’d run from him / He spread pitch on the stairs…”

Into the Woods (2014) Although I have been a Sondheim fanatic since discovering the Company cast album in 1976, and while the original production of Into the Woods was the first Broadway musical I saw before its cast recording had been released, I deliberately avoided the movie of it when it was new, on the basis of two proper names with which it was associated: Disney, and Rob Marshall. Perhaps only in Hollywood could a minimally talented hack like Rob Marshall reap such rewards (and a-wards) by removing the guts from ballsy musical plays like Chicago and Nine. After countless producers and screenwriters, including Larry Gelbart, had worked at it, what was Marshall’s great “break-through” on Chicago? Turning all the musical numbers into dream-fantasies Renee Zellweger imagines. If you have to justify why people are singing and dancing in a musical, why the fuck are you making a musical? Still, with a screenplay by James Lapine, the original book writer and director of Into the Woods, perhaps there was only so much damage Marshall could do to it. Well, it was someone’s brilliant idea to cast the magnificent Simon Russell Beale as the Baker’s Father and then butcher his role so completely he’s left with no songs and only a couple of lines, confusingly delivered, since we can’t tell who he is, whether he’s real or a phantom, and haven’t any idea whether his son (James Corden) knows either; and to let Chris Pine as an 18th century prince sport a trendy two-day growth of beard on his chin.‖ The picture looks splendid, which I attribute largely to its cinematographer (Dion Beebe), set decorator (Anna Pinnock), costumer (Colleen Atwood) and production designer (Dennis Gassner). And it’s largely well cast, with actors who can sing: Corden; Meryl Streep, sardonic but subdued as The Witch; lovely Emily Blunt as The Baker’s Wife; cute Daniel Huttlestone as a full-throated Jack; Lilla Crawford as a foghorn-voiced Little Red Riding Hood; Johnny Depp as her Wolf; Tracey Ullman as Jack’s Mother; and Anna Kendrick who, although attractive only from a single angle… and that one her director seldom favors… is an otherwise charming and effective Cinderella. Into the Woods was significantly better than I’d expected. Yet I still tremble whenever I hear another name yoked with this director’s: Follies. Hasn’t that poor show suffered enough?

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
‖As my friend Eliot M. Camarena once asked, do people like that when they’re children announce, “When I grow up, I wanna look like Fred C. Dobbs!”?


the-art-of-love-lg

The Art of Love (1965) A surprisingly brainless affair to have come from the typewriter of the witty Carl Reiner, riding high in 1965 with the deserved success of “The Dick Van Dyke Show,” which he created and oversaw, and for which he wrote many of the most memorable early episodes. The best thing about this moderately black farce concerning a failed American artist in Paris whose supposed suicide instantly drives up the prices fetched for his work by his duplicitous best friend (James Garner) is Van Dyke as the artist. His comedic timing, seemingly boneless body and inimitable way with a line or a situation are the equal of the great comedians he worshiped, and it’s one of the ironies of modern history that he came along at a time when movie and television comedies were so often loud, witless and inane. Had Blake Edwards not already collared Peter Sellers and Jack Lemmon, what a find Van Dyke would have been for that fellow student of slapstick!

Reiner can’t really be blamed for the general dopiness of the movie, since he was working from an existing story by two other writers (Alan Simmons and William Sackheim) and the movie’s young director, Norman Jewison, doesn’t appear to have been a great deal of help to him. The Art of Love is attractive to look at — it was shot by Russell Metty — but inert, marking time with things like Angie Dickinson’s fainting shtick (it’s funny the first time), Elke Sommers’ perpetual innocent act and the braying of Ethel Merman, apparently cast as a madam just so she could belt out an instantly forgettable nightclub number. The usually ingratiating Garner has little to play here but his character’s cheesy self-centeredness, and Reiner stoops to such things as plunking a cartoon Brooklynite Yiddishe couple (Irving Jacobson and Naomi Stevens) in the middle of Paris. Still, Jay Novello has a couple of funny bits as a nervous janitor and little Pierre Olaf does miracle work as an umbrella-toting police detective, Cy Coleman provided a perky score (with additional music by Frank Skinner), and DePatie-Freleng came up with some modestly amusing main title animation. There’s little excuse, however, for a comedy — especially one with Dick Van Dyke — whose only big laugh comes at the very end, and absolutely none for its indulging in such feeble wheezes as the periodic introduction of a Madame Defarge-like hag, complete with knitting needles, who shows up every now and then to screech her delight at Garner’s impending execution. But at least I now understand what my mother meant when she once told me that after seeing this one on television when I was a boy I walked around the house for a week saying, “Guillotine! Guillotine!”


Murder by Decree

Murder by Decree (1978) That Sherlock Holmes occupied a revered, albeit fictional, place in the same late Victorian Britain that saw the appalling murders in Whitechapel has intrigued Sherlockians for decades. What more natural meeting could there be than between Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s brilliant consulting detective and “Saucy Jacky,” as that figure of horror known popularly as Jack the Ripper styled himself in a letter to the papers? Derek Ford and Donald Ford (the former known primarily for his snickering sex comedies) imagined Holmes investigating the murders in the 1965 A Study in Terror, and the same year in which this more recent attempt was released saw the publication of Michael Didbin’s dark little novel The Last Sherlock Holmes Story, very much concerned with Jack. The elements are there even in the mind’s eye: The dimly gaslit cobblestone streets, the hansom cabs and private cabriolets, the enveloping fog that swallows up forms, faces and screams of terror and pain. That Bob Clark, the onlie begettor of Porky’s should, of all people, have directed as beautiful a fiction as Murder by Decree is as puzzling as his making that evocative adaptation of Jean Shepherd, A Christmas Story. But then, as Orson Welles once told Bogdanovich, “Peter, you only need one.”

The literate screenplay by the playwright John Hopkins emphasizes a more riant, and more passionate, Holmes than is the norm, and Christopher Plummer could scarcely be bettered in the role as the filmmakers, if not Conan Doyle, conceived it. His performance reaches two peaks, one infinitely quiet (his reaction to Geneviève Bujold’s heartbreaking madwoman), the other bristling with outrage at what his betters (including John Gielgud as the Prime Minister, unidentified in the picture but clearly made up to resemble Robert Gascoyne-Cecil) have been up to. Hopkins also, blessedly, gives us a Watson who is as far from the Nigel Bruce model as can be imagined. And while the irreplaceable James Mason is a bit hoary for the role, his aplomb is undeniable; a moment of especial charm is the way he expresses dismay at Holmes, and with a look of genuine hurt, when the former squashes the lone pea on the doctor’s plate. And if he is occasionally the voice of hidebound Empire, Mason’s (and Hopkins’) Watson is also equally as capable of wit as Holmes as, for example, when Sherlock asks his compatriot why his friend deems him only “the prince of detectives” and wishes to know who is king. I won’t spoil the joke here, nor the conclusion of this intricately plotted exercise, based on some theories by Elwyn Jones and John Lloyd in their contemporaneous book The Ripper File.

The exceptional cast includes a starchily smug and imperious Gielgud; the wrenching Bujold; Frank Finlay as an uncharacteristically deferential Inspector Lestrade; David Hemmings as the police inspector in charge of the case (and who bears absolutely no relationship to the very real Frederick Abberline); Susan Clark as a heartrending Mary Kelly; Anthony Quayle as the dangerously reactionary Sir Charles Warren; Peter Jonfield as a chillingly psychotic chief villain; and Donald Sutherland as the shaken spiritualist Robert Lees, who believes he’s seen the Ripper. Despite a few unnecessary visual flourishes, Clark’s eye is nearly unerring, abetted to an exceptional degree by the rich and expressive cinematography by Reginald H. Morris and the astonishing production design of Harry Pottle; I don’t know whether Pottle is responsible for the staggeringly effective matte paintings of London used in the picture, but whoever painted them, they put you absolutely there. The only real miscalculation in the movie is the highly derivative musical score by Paul Zaza and Carl Zittrer from which I heard distinct liftings from John Williams (the scene in Jaws of Richard Dreyfus investigating Ben Gardner’s boat), Jerry Goldsmith and Bernard Herrmann (those eerie strings) and Richard Rodney Bennett (the opening sequence of Murder on the Orient Express) and in which — aside from the plaintive traditional Irish tune for Mary Kelly — there is little that is either original, interesting, useful or pleasing to the ear.


Text copyright 2019 by Scott Ross

Armchair Theatre 2017

Standard

By Scott Ross

Note: In order to amend some older posts, and thanks to the new “improvements” WordPress has recently instituted, I am having to republish some of my previous essays. My apologies for the seeming redundancy.

The movies and other video items I watched (or, in rare cases, went out to see) during the year just passed.
BOLD+Underscore: Denotes very good… or at least, better-than-average.
*BOLD+Underscore w/Asterisk: A personal favorite.



Old Favorites re-viewed on a big theatre screen


Spectre (2015) I don’t understand why there’s been so little love for the 24th Bond. True, it’s no Skyfall — what is? Some people I know disliked the central premise. Others think the Daniel Craig titles have turned 007 from a dashing, erudite figure into a thug: M’s “blunt instrument.” And while I have a particular fondness for Roger Moore as Bond (his was the first Bond I saw in a theatre) I admire the Craigs more than any others in the series apart from the early Connerys and the Timothy Daltons. Craig also comes closest to resembling the Hoagy Carmichael Fleming prototype. On its own terms, the picture seemed to me exciting, thematically dark in a way that appeals to me, and stylishly (and occasionally, beautifully) made.


*Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977) One of my five favorite pictures, and which I haven’t seen on a big screen since 1978. (I don’t count the 1980 Special Edition.)

Guffey at the door F58

*The Ghost and Mr. Chicken (1966) A favorite comedy, given a rare screening by the Carolina Theatre in Durham.


*Some Like it Hot. (1959) Also viewed at a Carolina screening. My favorite movie, and I always see something new in it; this time I focused on Billy Wilder’s astonishing technical achievement in matching Tony Curtis’ lips to Paul Frees’ looping of “Josephine”‘s dialogue.

Some-like-it-hot-screen


New (non-documentary) movies viewed on a big theatre screen:
None. From which you may draw your own conclusions.


Revisited with pleasure
*F for Fake (1973) Orson Wellesnonpareil personal essay. “Our songs will all be silenced, but what of it? Go on singing.”
Absence_of_malice_xlg
*Absence of Malice
(1981) When this Sydney Pollack-directed newspaper drama opened in 1981, it received middling reviews and seemed somehow inconsequential. What a difference 35 years of media consolidation (and deepening personal taste) can make! Those of us who cared about such things knew too many papers, magazines and broadcast stations were in the hands of too few (usually conservative) people. But we had no idea then that, 15 years later, a Democrat would, with his 1996 Telecommunications Act, usher out the flawed but vitally important American free press and replace it, eventually, with a completely corporate, wholly right-wing, one.  For this reason alone, the picture has interest. Seeing it again, however, I was struck by the intelligence of Kurt Luedtke’s dialogue, how skillfully he lays out his narrative, and how deeply satisfying his denouement — which seemed at the time merely clever — really is. That Newman, Field, Bob Balaban, Josef Sommer and Wilford Brimley all give splendid performances is practically a given, and Melinda Dillon is shattering as Newman’s doomed sister; the sequence in which she runs desperately from house to house trying to gather up every copy of a paper carrying a story that will devastate her own life and her brother’s illustrates all too clearly not merely what a staggeringly humane and expressive actor she is, but how badly she has been served by Hollywood in the years since. Which is to say, barely at all.


*Black Sunday (1977) An immensely entertaining adaptation of Thomas Harris’ topical thriller about a Black September plot, directed in high style by John Frankenheimer. A vivid relic from the decades before The PATRIOT Act was a gleam in the Deep State’s eye.


*Munich (2005) Steven Spielberg and Tony Kushner’s devastating look at the violent reaction of the Israeli Mossad to the killings at the 1972 Olympiad.


Wag the Dog. (1997) It’s almost impossible to reconcile this genuinely funny political satire with the sour conservatism of its screenwriter, David Mamet, the most overrated American playwright of the past 40 years… although the fact it was made during the Clinton era may be a clue.


The List of Adrian Messenger (1963) An effective murder mystery from John Huston and Anthony Veillier out of Phillip MacDonald, burdened by an unnecessary gimmick (guest-stars in heavy makeup) and lumbered as well by its director’s tacit approval of upper-class snobbery and his love of that barbarous tradition, the fox-hunt.


*The Third Man. (1949) Graham Greene wrote it. Carol Reed directed it. Anton Karras performed the soon-to-be ubiquitous music. And Orson Welles had what was arguably his best role in a movie not also written by him. The only drawback in one’s thorough enjoyment of this deservedly beloved post-war thriller is knowing the producers wanted James Stewart for the lead. Good as Joseph Cotton is, once you hear that bit of casting-that-might-have-been, it’s almost impossible to refrain from imagining Stewart’s unique delivery every time “Holly Martins” speaks a line.


*Hot Millions (1968) A sleeper hit of its year, impossibly dated now in its then-striking use of computer technology, this Peter Ustinov-written comedy starring him and Maggie Smith is a movie that, for me, is a test of potential friendship. If I show it to someone and he or she doesn’t love it too, all bets are off.


*Cinderella (Disney, 1950) Remarkably fresh after nearly 70 years, this beguiling rendition of the Perrault fairy tale was a make-or-break project for Disney animation, still struggling to regain its pre-war foothold. And unlike recent Mouse House product, schizophrenically made with one eye on each new heroine’s spunky feminist bona fides and the other on crafting an ageless new “Princess” to add to the lineage, there was no art-by-committee finagling here; generations of girls and boys loved Cinderella for her natural ebullience, her love of animals, and her complete lack of self-pity. (Parenthetical: Several years ago, the “Classical” music critic Lloyd Schwartz quoted a friend who cited “A Dream is a Wish Your Heart Makes” as the most frightening song title he’d ever heard. I always think about that when I see the picture.)


Cotton Comes to Harlem (1970) Not as rich as the Chester Himes novel, whose last line made me chuckle for a week, but an awful lot of fun, with a perfectly cast Coffin Ed and Gravedigger Jones in Raymond St. Jacques and Godfrey Cambridge and a marvelous score by Galt McDermott.


*Mary Poppins (1964) This may have been the first movie I ever almost saw, during the summer following its record-breaking release, which would have put me at around four and a half. I know this because the movie was released in late August, and my sister and I were taken to it at a drive-in. Hence the “ever almost”: I remember only the beginning, and waking up in the back seat when Jane and Michael Banks were being menaced by a snarling dog in an alley. I finally got to see it again when it was reissued in 1973. I liked it then, but love it now in a way few 12 year-olds, even movie-mad pubescents as I was becoming then, ever could.


The Great Race - Lemmon as Fate

*The Great Race (1965) Another favorite of long-standing. Seeing this on television, even on a black-and-white set, in pan-and-scan format, interrupted by commercials and spread out over two consecutive Sunday evenings, delighted me and made me an instant Jack Lemmon freak. The new BluRay edition is stunningly executed.


French Connection II (1975) The rare sequel that succeeds on its own terms; although it was made during the period of John Frankenheimer’s acutest alcoholism it bears his trademark intelligence, verisimilitude and equal care with both action and actors.


Juggernaut (1974) A taut, entertaining thriller directed by Richard Lester concerning a bomb set to destroy a pleasure-liner at sea.


The Front Page (1931) A new Criterion edition, beautifully rendered, of the Lewis Milestone adaptation that shows how cinematic even the earliest talkies could be when handled by a master craftsman.


Robin Hood (1973) I loved this when it opened. But then, at 12 I was much less critical.


*Death on the Nile (1978) Nowhere near as accomplished, or as stylish, as the Sidney Lumet-directed Murder on the Orient Express which preceded it by four years, yet it holds many pleasures, not least its stellar cast. For a 17-year old nascent gay-boy, seeing both Maggie Smith and Angela Lansbury on the big screen was close to Nirvana.


*The Seven-Ups (1973) A sort of unofficial sequel to The French Connection, directed by that picture’s producer, this tense New York police procedural boasts a splendid central performance by Roy Scheider, a very fine supporting turn by Tony Lo Bianco, and a car chase sequence that, in its grittiness and excitement rivals those in Connection and Bullitt.


Two Mules for Sister Sarah (1970) A solid comic Western directed by Don Siegel and with a sharp, leftist screenplay by Albert Maltz, one of the Hollywood 10. Shirley MacLaine and Clinton Eastwood would seem to be as mis-matched in life as their characters are here, but they make an awfully good team. Features superb photography by the redoubtable Gabriel Figueroa and an otherwise pleasing Morricone score almost undone by an annoying recurrent “hee-haw” motif.


The Jungle Book (Disney, 1967) I was the perfect age when this one was released to embrace a new Disney animated feature — I had previously seen both Snow White and Cinderella in re-issue — and I went duly gaga over it. I had the Jungle Book comic (I wore the cover off that one through obsessive re-reading), Jungle Book Disneykins figurines from Royal Pudding, Jungle Book temporary tattoos, Jungle Book books, and, of course, the Jungle Book soundtrack album, which I wore to a veritable hockey-puck. My poor parents. Seeing it again in 1990 I was considerably less enthusiastic, but it’s remarkable what a quarter of a century can do for a picture. I still think it’s too self-consciously hip for its own good, especially in Phil Harris’ anachronistic vocal performance, but the character animation seems to me wonderfully expressive, especially that by Milt Kahl, John Lounsbery, Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston, who between them did at least half the picture.

The Jungle Book 165.2
The Jungle Book: George Sanders lends both his voice and his physiognomy to Sher Kahn, seen obliquely threatening Sterling Holloway’s Kaa.

The Aristocats (1970) Another I was less critical about when it was new, which seemed a bit bland on video but which now looks awfully good, and that in spite of its borrowings from the infinitely superior 101 Dalmatians and Lady and the Tramp, transposed to felinity. Not to be confused with The Aristocrats


The Cheyenne Social Club (1970) The pleasures inherent in seeing a relic from the time when even a trifling Western comedy was imbued with deliciously quirky characterizations and witty, fondly observed dialogue (in this case by James Lee Barrett.) It isn’t much, but for the much it isn’t, it’s rather charming.


*Rosemary’s Baby (1968) I somehow managed to miss this one until about 15 years ago, when I caught it at an art-house screening. Roman Polanksi’s screenplay (almost reverently faithful to the Ira Levin novel) and direction, the gorgeous cinematography by William A. Fraker and the effective score by Krzysztof Komeda (dead, sadly, within months of its release, this depriving us of a distinctive new compositional voice in movies), combined with the performances by its largely elderly cast and a notably plangent one by the often-insufferable Mia Farrow, make this exercise in stylish, low-key horror among the finest in the genre. What I was unprepared for then was how funny it could be, especially in Ruth Gordon’s knowing performance. “Chalky undertaste” become a running joke between me and my then-boyfriend for months afterward.

Rosmary's Baby large_gordon
Rosemary’s Baby: Polanski’s witty framing of Ruth Gordon.

Theatrical Documentary
I Am Not Your Negro. (2016) What was effective about this meandering and ultimately unsuccessful study of James Baldwin were the many clips of him speaking. But its makers set up a premise — why was Baldwin unable to finish his tripartite memoir of Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr. and Medgar Evers? — and then almost immediately abandoned it. A wasted opportunity.


Kedi. (2016) Lovely, affecting movie about the street cats of Istanbul.


Chisholm ’72: Unbought and Unbossed. (2004) A timely reminder of a true progressive groundbreaker… who was ultimately screwed by the Democratic Party. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.


*Point of Order! (1964) Emil de Antonio and Daniel Talbot’s superb compilation of kinescopes from the Army-McCarthy hearings. Especially relevant in these through-the-looking-glass times, in which liberal Democrats are, inexplicably, behaving in a way that would make Tail-Gunner Joe proud.


Selected Short Subject
Return to Glennascaul (aka, Orson Welles’ Ghost Story, 1953) Despite that second title, it’s not really his; Welles appended cinematic bookends to an atmospheric short picture made by Hilton Edwards.


Made for television
The Epic That Never Was (1965) On the aborted I, Claudius starring Charles Laughton. A British television documentary I first read about around 1974 and which contains all the extant footage shot for the ill-fated 1934 adaptation of the Graves novel. Josef von Sternberg appears, imperiously (and predictably) blaming everyone but himself for the debacle.


W.C. Fields: Straight Up (1986) Robert B. Weide and Ronald J. Fields’ marvelous celebration of the unlikeliest movie star of the 1930s.


*The Marx Brothers in a Nutshell (1982) Robert B. Weide again. When this delicious toast to the brothers first appeared in 1982, PBS committed the unpardonable sin of mentioning Woody Allen’s name in its promotional material, causing Allen to pitch a predictable fit and demand that Weide remove his footage. It was put back in for the DVD release, and reveals definitively that nothing was lost by its excision three decades ago. Allen says nothing of importance, makes no profound observations, and adds precisely zero to the critical canon on the team the documentary’s writer Joe Adamson once described as Groucho, Harpo, Chico and sometimes Zeppo.


Citizen Cohn (1992) History as cartoon, supplemented by blatant rip-offs of Tony Kushner.


Television series
I, Claudius (1976) Still powerful, if hampered by being shot on video rather than film, and with a beautifully modulated central performance by Derek Jacobi, who transformed stuttering into an art-form.


*Kukla, Fran and Ollie: The Lost Episodes (Volumes I, II and III) One of the loveliest video events of the last few years has been the release of these utterly charming kinescopes by the Burr Tillstrom Trust, which is currently working to restore 700 additional episodes. I don’t know whether today’s children, weaned on CGI and iPhones before they’re out of preschool, have the capacity to respond to the show’s gentle humors, but I would be willing to bet that if you sat a relatively unspoiled five-year-old down in front of these 30-minute charmers, he or she might be hooked for life. It would be pretty to think so.

Kukla_Fran_and_Ollie

The Dick Cavett Show: Comic Legends 12 full episodes from the late ’60s and early ’70s of that wittiest and most intelligent of American chat-shows. Lucille Ball, Jack Benny, Carol Burnett , Mel Brooks, George Burns, Bill Cosby and Jerry Lewis fascinate and delight; Groucho Marx banters deliciously with his young goyishe friend; Dick fawns all too fannishly over a smug, queer-baiting Bob Hope; the Smothers Brothers behave strangely (it seems to be a put-on, but of what?) and Woody Allen flaunts his repulsive look and persona. Ruth Gordon and Joe Frazier also show up, as does Rex Reed, bitching rather perceptively about the Academy Awards. Also included is the single most painful interview I’ve ever seen — and surely one of the most awkward Cavett ever conducted — with Mark Frechette and Daria Halprin, the beautiful but weirdly inarticulate stars of Zabriskie Point.


Seen a second time… and will never see again
The Anderson Tapes. (1971) Still interesting and entertaining but… what was it with Sidney Lumet and stereotyped “fag” characters?


One Day in September (1999) An Oscar winner in the documentary category, this impassioned examination of the murders of 11 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics muffs too many facts and, ultimately, sickens the viewer; not in the way the filmmakers hoped, but by exhibiting horrid color photos of the bloodied victims, which, whatever the intention, feels like an act of heartless exploitation.


New to me: Worth the trip
Dominion (2005) This first version of the “prequel” (odious neologism) to The Exorcist, directed by Paul Schrader, was completely re-filmed, by Rennie Harlin, whose name is, as it should be, a hiss and a byword.


Moulin Rouge (1952) Visually glorious but dramatically inert. And you can really see what in it inspired Bob Fosse when he made Cabaret. But… was there a less appealing leading actor of the Hollywood Era than Jose Ferrer?


New to Me: More than worth the trip

Star Wars: The Force Awakens
 (2015)I avoided the theatrical release of this one in a manner not unlike my aversion to the first Star Wars picture when I was 16, largely due to my loathing of the Disney Company. But after stumbling across a second-hand Blu-ray copy for an absurdly low price I thought I’d at least give it a spin. To my astonishment, this over-hyped space opera turned out more than well; it nearly obliterated the bad taste left by The Phantom Menace. J.J. Abrams’ direction, focused less on CGI effects than on human beings in conflict with each other and themselves (the latter the only thing Faulkner believed was worth writing about) was both riveting and surprisingly beautiful, and the Abrams/Lawrence Kasdan/Michael Arndt screenplay had pleasing weight and even levity. The only cavil about it is the niggling sense that the new series may be unable to shake replicating the same sort of father/son (or, in this case, grandfather/grandson) adulations and conflicts that powered the Lucas originals. Isn’t there any other plot available in that galaxy?


Across 110th Street (1972) A tough slice of New York life, circa 1971. Adapted by Luther Davis from the equally visceral novel by Wally Ferris, with Anthony Quinn and the great Yaphet Kotto.


Take a Hard Ride (1975) A cheerful, entertaining mix of Western and Blaxploitation, with very likable performances by Jim Brown and Fred Williamson, a fine villainous turn by Lee Van Cleef, an effectively silent Jim Kelly, a reasonably clever script (by Eric Bercovici and Jerrold L. Ludwig), good action set-pieces by the director Antonio Margheriti, and a one-of-kind score by Jerry Goldsmith.


Firecreek (1968) A downbeat Western starring James Stewart and Henry Fonda that is, in Calvin Clements’ incisive screenplay, about as despairing of human nature as it’s possible to get without the viewer wanting to slash his or her wrists. A double-feature of this and Welcome to Hard Times could put you in a funk for weeks.


Wrong is Right (1982) While we’re on the topic of press irresponsibility, this Richard Brooks satire of the year following Absence of Malice gleefully exposes, Chayefsky style, the appalling consequences of the electronic media’s love of ratings — a state of affairs being disastrously played out now, from Les Moonves’ giggling admission that the All-Trump-All-the-Time campaign coverage of 2016 was raking in the bucks for CBS to the current, slathering mania of so-called liberals for Russia-Russia-Russia McCarthyism.


The Kremlin Letter (1970) A flop in its day, and roundly panned by Pauline Kael, this John Huston thriller from 1970, imaginatively adapted from the Noel Behn novel by the director and his longtime collaborator Gladys Hill and featuring an absolutely marvelous score by Robert Drasnin is infinitely finer than its detractors would have you believe. The only complaint — and it’s a failure shared by Sidney Lumet in his 1971 version of the rather ingenious Laurence Sanders novel The Anderson Tapes, in his use of Martin Balsam — lies in Huston’s miscasting of the 63-year old George Sanders as a gay spy. The character, as Behn wrote him, is an attractive young man, which makes his position within a group of spectacularly selfish mercenaries eminently explicable. As with Balsam in Anderson, the change is mind-boggling, although the notoriously homophobic Huston is far less offensive in his handling of Sanders than Lumet was with his star. But it is, finally, Richard Boone’s movie, and he makes a meal of it.

The Kremlin Letter 1_613x463
The Kremlin Letter: Richard Boone and Patrick O’Neal.

The Night of the Following Day (1969) One of many late-1960s Brando pictures that helped make him box-office poison, this adaptation of a Lionel White thriller boasts an impeccably arranged kidnapping, a very fine performance by Brando, a good one by Pamela Franklin as the victim, and an unequivocally great one by Richard Boone as the most terrifying of the felons. The only sour note is the ending the director (Hubert Cornfield) imposed on it, over his star’s quite reasonable objections.


Rio Conchos (1964) Thanks to these last three pictures I was finally able to comprehend why aficionados love Richard Boone, an actor I had somehow managed to go 56 years without having seen.


Act of Violence (1949)A nicely-observed thriller starring Van Heflin, the young Janet Leigh and a typically stellar Robert Ryan that gets at some dark aspects of World War II mythology and contains one sequence, in which a stalking, menacing Ryan is heard but never seen, that is unlike anything I’ve ever encountered before.


Westward the Women (1951) An interesting Western variation, about a trail-boss transporting 138 “good women” to California. Expertly directed by William Wellman from a fine Charles Schnee original. Typically strong photography by William C. Mellor, a good central performance from Robert Taylor and an exceptionally vivid one by Hope Emerson make this, if not wholly successful, diverting and markedly original.

Track-of-the-cat-wellman3
William Hopper and Robert Mitchum on the Track of the Cat.

*Track of the Cat (1954) One of the strongest, strangest Westerns of the 1950s, beautifully adapted from the psychologically harrowing Walter Van Tillberg Clark novel and spectacularly filmed by William A. Clothier. I think this one ranks as the most pleasing surprise of my cinema year.


Cuba (1979) A fast flop from Richard Lester that is in fact a well-observed look at the events leading up to Castro’s coup, and is infinitely finer than Havana, the terrible 1990 romance from Sydney Pollack. Sean Connery adds his rough charm, Brooke Adams is almost impossibly beautiful, there is also delicious support from Jack Weston, Hector Elizondo, Denholm Elliott, Martin Balsam, Chris Sarandon, Alejandro Rey and Lonette McKee, splendid photography by David Watkin, and a memorable score by Patrick Williams.


Rio Lobo (1970) An old-pro’s swan-song. Howard Hawks directed it, John Wayne is the star, Leigh Brackett wrote it (with Burton Wahl), Jack Elam gives juicy support, William A. Clothier shot it, and Jerry Goldsmith scored it. The only complaints I have concern some remarkably bad pulled punches by Wayne. But with a set-up this entertaining, and the stunningly pulchritudinous Jorge Rivero along for the ride, that’s a minor matter indeed.


*Cutter’s Way (1981) Critically lauded, half-heartedly marketed and ignored by audiences, this fatalistic drama is one of the last hurrahs of ‘70s era personal filmmaking.


Butch and Sundance: The Early Years (1979) Entirely unnecessary, and hampered by both anachronism and a lack of internal logic — people, names and incidents Paul Newman either didn’t know or was vaguely aware of in the previous picture are revealed or dwelt on at length here — this Richard Lester-directed diversion goes down surprisingly well, abetted by László Kovács’ glorious cinematography, the charming central performances of Tom Berenger and William Katt, and yet another marvelous score by Patrick Williams, one that may stick in your head and which you could find yourself humming passages from for days or even weeks afterward.


The Social Network (2010) Aaron Sorkin and David Fincher’s take on the birth of Facebook. It’s exceptionally articulate and well-made, with gorgeously muted lighting by Jeff Cronenweth and impeccable performances by Jesse Eisenberg (as Mark Zuckerberg), Andrew Garfield, Justin Timberlake and Armie Hammer. But you will be forgiven for wondering, at the end, what it all meant. At the end, one of the attorneys (Rashida Jones) representing Zuckerberg against the Winklevoss twins says, “You’re not an asshole, Mark. You just want to be.” Who the hell did Sorkin think he was kidding with that one?


*Up Tight (1968) Jules Dassin’s return to American moviemaking is a spirited “fuck you” to everything the studios, and the audience, held dear.


Paranormal Activity (2007) I generally avoid hand-held camera exercises, but the best and most terrifying sequences in this cleverly conceived and executed horror hit, ingeniously executed by its writer-director Oren Peli for $15,000, are nicely nailed-down. The absolute reality Peli sets up for the picture, and which is perfectly anchored by the performances of Katie Featherston and Micah Sloat (for whom the movie should have opened doors but, oddly, did not) makes the periodic scares that much more effective, leading to a genuinely shocking finale.


*Super 8 (2011) J. J. Abrams’ paean to his adolescence, and to certain entertainments in the ‘80s quiver of his co-producer Steven Spielberg is a kind of E.T. for the post-Nixonian Aliens generation. The world Abrams’ middle-school protagonists inhabit is similar to that of my own high-school years, and that specificity (explicable only when you discover that in 1979 the writer-director was 13) grounds the blissfully scary goings-on, and one is struck from the first frames by how keen an eye its filmmaker has for the wide-screen image. There’s a nice “Twilight Zone” in-joke in the Air Force operation code-named “Operation Walking Distance,” and the kids are just about perfect, especially the endearingly sweet Joel Courtney and the almost preternaturally poised Elle Fanning. Michael Giacchino’s score is a rousing example of the John Williams School of action movie composition, Kyle Chandler gives a fine account of Courtney’s newly-widowed father (the tensions between the two will be especially resonant to those whose relationships with their own fathers were less than ideal), Larry Fong’s cinematography could scarcely be improved upon, and the special effects are apt and canny, the CGI work for once rarely noticeable as CGI work. Funny, frightening and with a finale that is pleasingly emotional — plangent but in no way bathetic. The movie has a genuine sense of wonder.

Super 8 Joel Courtney - 04
Super 8: Joel Courtney as the Abrams stand-in.


New to Me: Meh…
Not With My Wife You Don’t! (1966)
 Even Larry Gelbart couldn’t make a silk purse out of this somewhat frenetic sex-farce, although it’s by no means a total loss.


Journey into Fear. (1943) What’s good of Orson Welles’ direction is overwhelmed by what’s bad of Norman Foster’s.


Carlton-Brown of the F.O. (1959) Middling political satire from Ealing.


The Crimson Kimono. (1959) Surprisingly unsubstantial to have come from Samuel Fuller.


Where Were You Went the Lights Were Out? (1968) Fitfully amusing blackout comedy starring Doris Day and Robert Morse that betrayed its French farce stage origins in the less ingenious second half.


Shalako (1968) The short Louis L’Amour novel was better, and more successful.


The Summing-Up
A few mediocrities, but no real dogs this year, which was nice. As Pauline Kael once observed: Life’s too short to waste time on some stinky movie.

Text copyright 2018 by Scott Ross


Grateful thanks to my good friend Eliot M. Camarena for enlightening my movie year, and special thanks to him for Act of Violence, The List of Adrian Messenger, Moulin Rouge, Point of Order, Up Tight, Westward the Women, and especially The Kremlin Letter and Track of the Cat. Eliot is one of the sanest, most politically astute people I know, and his recommendations are not to be taken lightly.

Peddling disaster: “Wrong is Right” (1982)

Standard

By Scott Ross

Richard Brooks is one of those odd Hollywood characters auteurists can’t pin down, and that’s irksome to them. They want consistency of vision; content is less important to them than a measurable idiosyncratic (hence, “personal”) style. And while I can see no particular pattern in Brooks’ work as a writer-director, nor an especially consistent style, I don’t mind that in the least: George Cukor and William Wyler had no particular style to speak of and that didn’t prevent them from directing a number of our most well-loved movies. Sidney Lumet’s style changed from picture to picture, and he made some of the finest American movies of the last 60 years. What I think unites Lumet and Brooks is that they shared a sense that style and approach are, rightly, dictated by content and form — a concept few auteurists can comprehend. There’s little that unites, say, Elmer Gantry and The Professionals, or $ and Bite the Bullet, except that the man who made them was highly intelligent, often witty and, despite Brooks’ macho persona, irreducibly humane.

Wrong is Right (1982) was Brooks’ penultimate movie, and it was pretty much ignored by audiences of the time, who were moving deep into the Reagan Dream and didn’t wish to be disturbed from their sleep. Besides, after Network, who needed to see another hyper-kinetic satire on television? But, while Wrong is Right comes to many of the same conclusions that Network did, the picture is not warmed-over Chayefsky. If anything, it has more in common with the later Wag the Dog in its black-humored cynicism concerning the intersection of show biz and politics, and with Larry Gelbart’s late, almost despairing, deductions (in work for cable such as Weapons of Mass Distraction) about the intractable mess Bill Clinton created with his disastrous Telecommunications Act of 1996, which has in the interim destroyed the entire concept of a free press, without which a republic cannot flourish, or even function. Twenty years after All the President’s Men celebrated the professional ethics of determined reporters, Clinton seemed intent on killing the very notion of a press independent of corporate ownership, much as Jeff Bezos has succeeded in turning the very paper for which “Woodstein” investigated Watergate into a conduit for CIA and DNC propaganda disguised as news. In the current journalistic void, where almost nothing one sees, hears or reads in the corporate media can be trusted, Wrong is Right seems positively prescient.

Brooks based his screenplay on a thriller by Charles McCarry concerning the collision of a bitter American revolutionary, a star television reporter, and the President. (I tried to read it, but McCarry seemed so enamored of CIA I gave up after only a couple of chapters.) Transferring the revolutionary aspect to the Middle East, the filmmaker fashioned a wild, compelling satire that, if only occasionally delivering a line that makes you laugh out loud, is never less than thoroughly engaging. Brooks’ reporter here is an adventurer-turned-journalist (Sean Connery), his revolutionary an Arabian terrorist (Henry Silva, of all people) and his President (George Grizzard) a football-obsessed career politician intent on winning a close election between himself and a Reaganesque hack (Leslie Neilsen). Added to this already heady brew is Robert Conrad as a gung-ho General called Wombat (shades of Colonel “Bat” Guano); a serpentine CIA chief (G.D. Spradlin); a ratings-mad network honcho (Robert Webber) who could now be quite easily mistaken for Les Moonves giggling about how much money CBS was making from the Trump candidacy; a smart, savvy, main-chance grabbing black female Vice-President (Rosalind Cash) bearing the surname of Jimmy Carter’s predecessor; a natty international arms dealer (Hardy Krüger) who, as these types tend, isn’t concerned with who gets a pair of nuclear bombs, as long as he gets the cash; and a slick, opportunistic Presidential aid (Dean Stockwell) the like of whom Aaron Sorkin would never have presented on The West Wing. John Saxon also shows up, as a CIA agent who is the last word in sang-froid; Katherine Ross appears — all too briefly for my taste — as a journalist with a secret life; and Ron Moody contributes a neat cameo as the Mideast potentate who sets the whole, blazing ball rolling. (As an added frisson for the modern viewer, a young Jennifer Jason Leigh pops up as a teenager only slightly less appalling than Leigh herself became as an adult.)

Although Wrong is Right clocks in at nearly two hours, the pace of the picture is so fast there is never the slightest opportunity for longueurs. That breakneck structure is attained largely through Brooks’ tight, economical (and rather bracingly theatrical) writing style, as a word or phrase uttered by one character leads directly to its echo in the mouth of another, sometimes continents away. Metaphorically, Brooks’ dialogue plumbs the rich vein usually mined by Gelbart himself; think of the self-important, ironically malaprop-spouting Colonel Flagg of “M*A*S*H” as the progenitor of nearly every character here, and you get a sense of the keen wit and wordplay Brooks invests into what, on the surface, is the stuff of international thrillers. The look of the picture is itself almost like TV as it was then; the cinematographer Fred J. Koenekamp’s use of deep-focus and bright color would not have been out of place in a Universal television movie of the week from the period. And if the (admittedly infrequent) special effects are somewhat threadbare, those moments pass quickly enough — although, in the immediate post-Star Wars era, they must have seemed pretty shoddy indeed to those few moviegoers who actually purchased a ticket.

As a taste of Brooks’ delicious dramaturgical style, here’s Connery’s Patrick Hale after he has suggested to Webber that the network obtain Hardy’s suitcase bombs, and been rebuked with the accusation that he’s practicing “checkbook journalism.” Connery delivers the monologue with barely-contained relish:

What kind of journalism was it when television paid half a million dollars for an exclusive on the Bay of Pigs? A million dollars to Nixon, to apologize coast to coast? CBS paid Haldeman, Eisenhower, and Johnson. NBC paid John Dean and Robert Kennedy’s assassin. ABC paid Lieutenant Calley, and for breakfast, served up the My Lai massacre. And what about the killer I put on television? From death row to the electric chair, fried meat on prime time. You paid $100,000 for that. Paid it to the killer! Do you call that journalism?

We’re in show business, baby. Make them laugh. Make them cry. Make them buy, by and by. We peddle disaster. Violence — it’s commercial! Blood and tears and football and cheers. Performers, superstars. Get them on, get them off. Next, next, fast, fast! We’re in the entertainment business, and there’s nothing wrong with that… if you call it that.

That no one in the business now will call it that makes Wrong is Right a movie less out of its time than far ahead of it.


Text copyright 2017 by Scott Ross