Monthly Report: September 2022

Standard

By Scott Ross

As ever, click the links on the capsules for the complete reviews and essays.

Funny Face (1957) Fred Astaire’s last major musical, with vintage Gershwin songs, a typically charming performance by Audrey Hepburn and a brilliant supporting turn by the treasurable Kay Thompson.


The Shakiest Gun in the West (1966) A generally amusing remake of the 1948 Bob Hope vehicle The Paleface reimagined for Don Knotts with bits of The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance thrown in. It’s better, certainly, than the anemic The Reluctant Astronaut although nowhere near as good as The Ghost and Mr. Chicken. (All three were written by James Fritzell and Everett Greenbaum.) The picture virtually defines the word “inconsequential,” but it’s got some good laughs — the sight of Knotts in drag not the least among them, although the question of why some big, virile Indian brave goes mad with lust every time he lays eyes on him remains unanswered — excellent set direction (Alexander Golitzen and Henry Larrecq), good costumes (Grady Hunt), enjoyable music (by Vic Mizzy, of course) and a lot of wonderful character actors in supporting roles. These include Jackie Coogan, Ruth McDevitt, Dub Taylor, Hope Summers. Burt Mustin, a young William Christopher, Carl Ballantine as a fast-talking wagon salesman and and Pat Morita as his general factotum.


Little Shop of Horrors – The Director’s Cut (1986) Why some people feel the need to tamper with success is a question perhaps best left to psychoanalysis, but some things really are better left alone. Frank Oz and Howard Ashman, trying to preserve the satirical content of Ashman and Alan Mencken’s stage musical, filmed the show’s original ending, in which both leading characters die, then seemed shocked when preview audiences hated what they’d done. They somehow didn’t get that film transforms the human figure, gives it a realism, ironically, that an actual person performing in front of you on a stage often doesn’t have. The pair also designed and filmed a long sequence in which the alien plants lay waste to a city. Both scenes were subsequently cut and a new ending devised in which the nebbish Seymour (Rick Moranis) and his sweetly ditzy inamorata Audrey (Ellen Greene) escape to their suburban dream, with a sly wink at the audience at the climax. Having badly miscalculated once, and corrected the error, Oz replicated it in this “Director’s Cut,” which preserves the nasty preview edit. (Ashman died years ago, before the premiere of Beauty and the Beast.)

What’s always been delightful about Little Shop remains so, even in this overstuffed edition: The witty doo-wop score, Ashman’s darkly funny script taking off from the two-day-wonder 1960 Roger Corman movie, Oz’s creative direction, the performances by the leads (Moranis, Greene, Vincent Gardenia, Steve Martin and Levi Stubbs as the voice of the plant), the wonderful black girl-group Greek chorus (Tichina Arnold, Michelle Weeks, Tisha Campbell), the superb “Skid Row” production design by Roy Walker, the felicitously-named Robert Paynter’s rich cinematography and Lyle Conway’s miraculous puppetry for the “Audrey II” alien. Bill Murray gives an inspired performance as a dental masochist; his scene with Martin is almost a cinematic transliteration of the old joke about what happens when a sadist and a masochist meet. But Oz’s original finale, with its obvious nod to the original King Kong, goes on and on, pointlessly and annoyingly, for what feels like hours. The Blu-ray on which I watched his preferred cut fortunately contains the original theatrical edit. I sincerely hope the “Director’s Cut” never supersedes it. That would be a horror.


Dori Brenner, “Chris” Walken, Ellen Greene, Antonio Fargas and Lenny Baker

Next Stop, Greenwich Village (1976) The writer-director Paul Mazursky’s funny, heartfelt cinematic reminiscence of his youth as an aspiring actor. Mazursky’s previous picture, the splendid Harry & Tonto, had been a “road movie,” and Next Stop is a bit like a road movie without the road: Mazursky’s alter ego, Larry Lapisnky (the wonderful Lenny Baker) leaves home at the beginning for the Village, and exits New York at the end.

Mazursky’s openheartedness informs every moment of Next Stop, Greenwich Village. I don’t think there’s ever been a movie portrait of the Village to match it, and I doubt there’s another American picture that comes close to capturing the headiness, the ardor, the go-for-broke optimism (and the sadness) of a group of talented young people on the cusp of launching their theatrical careers. Mazursky even makes a kind of peace with his own maddening mother who in Shelley Winters’ marvelous performance becomes in a way the ultimate screen embodiment of Jewish Motherhood. Larry’s world, which his creator observes with non-judgmental amusement, includes his girlfriend Sarah (the superb Ellen Greene), his gentle peacemaking father (Mike Kellin), a womanizing dramatic poet (Chris Walken) based on Mazursky’s one-time friend and romantic rival Howard Sackler, the periodically suicidal Anita (Lois Smith, in an astonishing performance), the amiable Connie (Dori Brenner), the gay black hustler Bernstein (Antonio Fargas) forever announcing he’s fallen in love with some trick or other, Larry’s health-food purveying employer (the great Lou Jacobi) and his acting coach (Michael Egan, essentially playing Herbert Berghof). Joe Spinnell also has a good bit as a cop who interrupts Larry’s drunken actor fantasies and Jeff Goldblum has another as an obnoxious actor. Arthur J. Ornitz, who also shot An Unmarried Woman for Mazursky, brought a beautiful, warm, muted palette to the picture, a form that perfectly complements the movie’s content.


The Player (1992) Robert Altman and Michael Tolken’s satirical fantasia on Hollywood, based on the latter’s novel, was the brightest release of its summer and one of that year’s most accomplished and entertaining pictures. I’ve never been sure that Altman’s Brechtian approach, treating the entirety of the action as a film-within-a-film, succeeds — those B- movie, film noir posters on the walls of a modern movie studio which could more reasonably be expected to sport framed examples of its own product only exist, after all, as self-conscious symbols — yet the movie is so light on its feet, and contains so many artfully rendered digs at the naked crassness pervading the movie industry it’s seldom less than both amusing and instructive. The dozens of stars playing themselves, some in what Mike Todd once called cameo roles, others in what amounts to walk-on appearances, lend a strange verisimilitude to the picture… “strange” in that the movie has no particular reality, so personalities such as Harry Belafonte, Cher and Jack Lemmon are like figures in the carpet of a dream. Or perhaps a nightmare; although The Player is often very funny, and its central actor rightly called “a shit-bag producer,” one moreover who murders a screenwriter and gets away with it, the journey of Griffin Mill (Tim Robbins) is one Kafka would appreciate.


Snoopy, Come Home (1972) The second Peanuts feature, which I loved at 11, made the mistake of putting Snoopy in the forefront and relegating the kids to supporting actors, a tendency it shared with the strip itself in those days. The modestly talented Bill Melendez directed and although the songs are by Richard M. Sherman and Robert B. Sherman they’re more about mood than character, and character was the Sherman’s forte. Among the artists involved were the Disney veteran Don Lusk, Phil Roman and Bob Clampett’s great (and certifiably insane) animator Rod Scribner.


The Frighteners — Director’s Cut (1996) As with Tim Burton, it’s become increasingly difficult to remember the time when Peter Jackson was an interesting filmmaker. The Frighteners is like its Danny Elfman score: Too busy, too frenetic and, ultimately, not exhilarating but exhausting. The best thing about the picture is Michael J. Fox’s performance as Frank Bannister, a phony spiritualist whose business is kept (barely) afloat through his association with several actual ghosts (Chi McBride, Jim Fyfe, John Astin). The death of his wife in an automobile accident years before has left Frank nearly devoid of feeling and although Fox is engaging he carries a weight of depression. The movie’s larger plot involves the ghost of a young mass-murderer (Jake Busey) who is still killing, and the approach of Jackson and his co-scenarist Fran Walsh to matters of spiritualism are utterly illogical: Shades such as Astin’s Judge are somehow still moldering, losing parts of their bodies as they rot, and the spirits can themselves be destroyed by other ghosts. The crowning horrors of the picture are not the ghostly goings-on but the incredibly overripe performances by Peter Dobson as a recent murder victim and, especially, the appalling Jeffrey Combs as the unhinged government investigator Dammers. However low one’s opinion of the FBI, surely it’s an impossible stretch to imagine that even so corrupt an entity would sanction an agent as obviously deranged as this one.


George Segal and Ruth Gordon as seen by Al Hirschfeld

Where’s Poppa? (1970) One of the sickest comedies ever made and, if you’re open to it, one of the funniest. In this adaptation by Robert Klane of his acid-tinged comic novel, George Segal plays a hag-ridden lawyer coping with his senescent mother (Ruth Gordon) whom he would like to get rid of by fair means or foul. (When he dresses in a gorilla suit in hopes of giving her a fatal coronary she knees him in the balls; as he lies there in pain she gurgles, “Oh, Gordonyou almost scared me to death!” to which he rasps, “Almost doesn’t count.”) It’s a surreal black comedy where nearly everyone is either insane or behaves that way. Carl Reiner directed the picture as if it made perfect sense, and that squareness makes the dialogue even funnier; at a crucial juncture Segal snarls out a hilarious threat to Gordon whose obscene ferocity absolutely fractured me.

Among the other inmates are Ron Leibman as Gordon’s idiot brother, Trish Van Devere as the home nurse Gordon falls in love with, Barnard Hughes and Vincent Gardenia as pathological court plaintiffs, Rob Reiner as one of Gordon’s typically loopy clients, Rae Allen as Leibman’s wife, Paul Sorvino as the barking curator of a nightmare old-folks’ home, Garrett Morris as a cheerful Central Park mugger, William Le Massena as a judge and Alice Drummond, who has a great scene as a woman stuck in an elevator with a naked Leibman.


Image via Blu-ray.com

Mastermind (1969/1976) A silly, enjoyable spoof of Charlie Chan movies starring Zero Mostel that sat on the shelf for seven years before being given a perfunctory release. When you think of the number of truly wretched, slavering “comedies” that routinely infested American screens during that period and were infinitely more successful at the box office it’s hard to imagine why the producers of this one were so ashamed of it, or why they couldn’t find a distributor. Written by William Peter Blatty (billed as “Terence Clyne”) and Ian McLellan Hunter, Mastermind is frequently hilarious and never less than amusing, although you may wonder why, when every other Japanese character speaks perfect English only Mostel’s Inspector Hoku Ichihara expresses himself in Charlie Chanese. (It’s not exactly Pidgin, but if you’ve read the Earl Derr Biggers Chan novels you’ll recognize its contours immediately.) The direction by Alex March is like so much television of the period, as is the cinematography by Gerald Hirschfeld. But there’s a funny chase sequence, and the likable performers range from Bradford Dillman as an iffy American government agent to Sorrell Booke as a suspect scientist, Herbert Berghof as a mad German and Felix Silla as his creation, a mean little robot called Schatzi. Jules Munshin and Phil Leeds also show up, as a pair of Israeli agents who may or may not be lovers. Fred Karlin contributed a pleasant score, and Mostel is more restrained than usual; there’s a slightly Zen quality to the character of Inspector Ichihara, and it affects the entire tone of the picture in a positive way.


Peter’s introduction to the audience: A fascinating image suggesting a young masked burglar with an unsettling, malevolent smile.

Peter Pan (1953) The inevitable Disney version of J.M. Barrie’s play and, later, novel. I saw the picture initially on one of its theatrical reissues (ask your parents) around 1970 and it was one of the few animated Disneys I had no overwhelming desire to see again. Watching it now I can understand that lack of enthusiasm. It’s a typically good-looking, well animated exercise that feels utterly empty of content or emotion and, although set in the early part of the 20th century, is wedded to Jud Conlon’s resolutely 1950s vocal arrangements. That it took no fewer than seven composers and lyricists to come up with the anemic song score is telling, and Sammy Fain’s “What Made the Red Man Red?” is, to a modern sensibility, appalling. (And why does the asexual Peter whoop it up like a sex-crazed wolf in some Tex Avery cartoon because Tiger Lily has rubbed noses with him?)

Speaking of Avery, the best thing about this Peter Pan are the realizations of Captain Hook (Frank Thomas), Mr. Smee (Ollie Johnston) and the Crocodile (Wolfgang Reitherman), all of whom seem to have wandered in from another, broader animated dimension and whose vocal characterizations (Hans Conried as Hook, Bill Thompson as Smee) are unalloyed delights. Bobby Driscoll was the model for Peter and gives a nice vocal performance which emphasizes Peter’s unthinking pubescent selfishness.


Carnal Knowledge (1971) Jules Feiffer’s wonderfully titled look at incompatible sexual relationships, icily directed by Mike Nichols in long, long takes and exquisitely photographed by Giuseppe Rotunno. Feiffer initially planned it as a play, and the scenes have a theatrical shape to them. Actually, they feel like elongated versions of Feiffer’s Village Voice strips and the ironies he expresses have a ruthless inevitability. The script grew out of its author’s observation of men who desire women’s bodies yet despise the women themselves and the embodiment of that attitude is Jack Nicholson’s Jonathan. As a college boy he’s the kind of young hypocrite who complains of a girl that she “let” him feel her up on the first date and it turned him off and who is constantly alert for “ball-breakers” yet is brutal to the women who are fool enough to love him. Jonathan’s counterpart, his college roommate Sandy (Art Garfunkel) is gentle and less crude (Jonathan has an adolescent fixation on “big tits”) but he’s every bit as hard to please: He goes from the blank Susan (Candice Bergen) to the steely Cindy (Cynthia O’Neal) to the flower-child Jennifer (Carol Kane) and never seems satisfied with any of them. And Jonathan is such a rat, and so sexually suspect, he isn’t happy unless he can seduce Susan while she’s dating Sandyactually, because she’s seeing his best friend.

The acting is highly variable. Why anyone ever thought Bergen was an actress is one of those eternal mysteries, while Garfunkel’s character barely exists and poor Rita Moreno is given an impossible scene in which as a call-girl she has to excessively praise Jonathan’s virility in order for him to achieve an erection. Nicholson completely gives in to Jonathan’s psycho-sexual contradictions and obsessions, but the revelation is Ann-Margret as the hapless Bobbie, who under Jonathan’s tender ministrations goes from a happy young woman to an emotional and psychological wreck. Nichols was a master at directing actors, and of developing character through behavior. Where, in this picture, he was less assured was in his showier gambits: The restaurant set seeming to revolve as Jonathan and Bobbie talk, for example, or the way the background behind Moreno appears to be rising as she performs her degrading monologue. The worst moment, naturally, involves Bergen: A tight closeup of her face as the unseen Jonathan and Sandy compete to make her laugh and she does so, endlessly. Earlier Susan has told Sandy that everyone acts, and it’s clear that this scene is supposed to show how she acts as much as everyone else, yet instead of illustrating the thesis the shot becomes increasingly annoying, with Bergen’s incompetence its chief feature. Far better is Feiffer’s often trenchant dialogue, such as when Jonathan complains that Bobbie never gets out of bed:

Bobbie: The reason I sleep all day is, I can’t stand my life.
Jonathan: What life?
Bobbie: Sleeping all day!

If you’ve ever been a depressive, or loved one, you know how true that statement is.


Text copyright 2022 by Scott Ross

Winner: “Around the World in 80 Days”

Standard

By Scott Ross

Dear, dear WordPress: Why must you fix what isn’t broken? Why in order to edit the images in my original post must I do the whole damn thing over? — Signed, Frustrated


One of the most completely entertaining movies of its time, and one that continues to deliver enormous pleasure, even reduced to home viewing size. That any independent producer, let alone the much-bankrupted Michael Todd, managed to get it made is remarkable. That is was a hit was extraordinary.* That it is so sharp, intelligent and funny, as well as huge, is a bloody miracle.

Orson Welles performing some literal magic during his disastrous stage musical of Around the World in collaboration with Mike Todd and Cole Porter. Welles was one of the few stars pointedly not asked to perform a cameo in Todd’s movie.

Todd got the idea for the movie (“stole” might be an apter word) from Orson Welles, who adapted it as a memorable “Campbell’s Playhouse” radio show and later as a Broadway musical extravaganza produced by Todd… who left everyone in the lurch, forcing Welles to scramble for money to keep it going. That the musical’s score, by Cole Porter, contained not a single number with any afterlife is telling; the period during which the show was written was Porter’s professional nadir. For Welles, who cast himself as Inspector Fix as well as directing the thing, it was an over-extended, and ultimately unsuccessful, magic-act. (He had much better luck, at least in England, with his astonishingly theatrical stage play Moby Dick — Rehearsed, which Kenneth Tynan famously — and, based on the published script, correctly — noted “turns the theatre once more into a house of magic.”)

Learn by doing: Cantinflas and David Niven consult a manual on ballooning… after they lift off.

As a literary adaptation, Around the World in 80 Days bears unusual fealty to its source. (The book itself has a more compelling narrative than, say, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, a Jules Verne novel Walt Disney had improved upon two years previously.) While the screenwriters James Poe, John Farrow (father of Mia) and S.J. Perlman, who doctored the script and shared the Oscar it was awarded, alter a few sequences and add an immoderate dash of polished wit to the dialogue — much of which I suspect is Perlman’s — the storyline is almost entirely Verne’s.

Todd, rightly, believed the urbane David Niven the only natural choice to portray Verne’s whist-mad, clock-watching Phileas Fogg. His casting of the inescapably Mexican Cantinflas as Fogg’s French valet Passepartout, on the other hand, raised more than a few eyebrows. Yet the diminutive comedian proves himself perhaps the only performer of his time to truly bear comparisons to Chaplin; you can easily imagine Charlie doing most of what Cantinflas does, and for once the comparison does not harm the performer assuming Chaplin’s mantle.

The 22-year old Shirley MacLaine as Princes Auoda.

The natural casting choice for an Indian Princess? A redheaded, Scots-Irish Virginian contract starlet named Shirley MacLaine. Rounding out the central cast is Robert Newton, making a veritable meal of Fix (“Follow that hostrich!”) There was nothing subtle about Newton; when he needed to be frightening, he went for absolutely terrifying (Bill Sykes in Lean’s Oliver Twist) and it is his Long John Silver most people are imitating when they lapse into what they think is pirate-speak (“Aaarrr, matey, aaarrr.”) Fix was, sadly, his last role; he suffered a fatal coronary a month after filming was completed.

Robert Newton, about to slip a “Hong Kong Snickersnee” — otherwise known as a Mickey Finn — to an unsuspecting Cantinflas.


Some observers at the time (and since) complain that Todd’s use of four-dozen “guest stars” in small roles was mere publicity-seeking stunt casting. I beg to differ. What he got, and gave to the movie, was what those actors and comedians did best, in roles that might otherwise have served as mere filler. It’s great fun seeing all those familiar faces — and hearing their equally famous voices — in supporting roles. True, a few of them (Evelyn Keyes, Fernandel, Mike Mazurki, Frank Sinatra, Victor McLaglen) last mere seconds. But a small clutch (José Greco, Beatrice Lillie, Edward R. Murrow) get specialty items and quite a few of them (notably the British) craft sparkling little gems out of what Todd termed their “cameos”: Finlay Currie, Robert Morley, Noel Coward, John Gielgud, Harcourt Williams, Cedric Hardwicke, Peter Lorre, Buster Keaton, Andy Devine, John Mills, Hermione Gingold, Glynis Johns and, especially, Ronald Colman.


Colman is not among my favorite actors by any stretch of the imagination, but his perfect dismissal of a bogus news item (“That must have been The Daily Telegraph. You never would have read that in The Times.”) a line that bears the fine Italian hand of S.J. Perlman, is not merely my favorite in this script, but a favorite, period, and is delivered by Colman with altogether smashing sang-froid. The only sour casting note is Todd’s hiring that genocidal racist Col. Tim McCoy as a Calvary officer, and I’m thoroughly flummoxed that the splendid Phillip Ahn, as an elderly citizen of Hong Kong who takes a little of the starch out of Fogg’s Imperialist snobbery, was not included in the credits. (And that Keye Luke appeared un-credited as well; as whom?)

Lionel Lindon’s cinematography is often astonishing, making the picture-postcard scenery of the movie’s various locations vividly real; it must have been a knockout on the big, wide screen. Michael Anderson’s swift direction keeps the whole big ball of wax from dissolving, and in what proved to be his final score Victor Young provided one of the era’s most charming, and infectious, soundtracks. An added fillip, which I imagine must have tickled the movie’s many patrons immensely, are Saul Bass’ delicious end credits, perfectly set by Young as a kind of cantata of thematic reprises bound together by a relentlessly ticking, Fogg-like animated clock.

The Spanish poster, which makes it seem to a Latin audience besotted with Cantinflas that he, not David Niven, is the star of the movie. If that caricature isn’t by Al Hirschfeld, it’s a damn good imitation.
One of the finest musical scores ever composed for an American movie gets a remarkably faithful, if necessarily truncated, soundtrack album.

Todd rode his success hard; unsurprisingly for him, the producer was also one of the earliest of the movie ballyhoo artists. Not only was the soundtrack LP a bestseller (Young was awarded a posthumous Oscar for the score) but there were countless instrumental albums by a dizzying array of bands.

There were also, in addition to an Avon paperback tie-in (profusely illustrated, as they used to say, with stills), two editions, from Random House, of a pasteboard souvenir book, one large, one digest-sized. (Although nearly identical in content and illustration, the smaller version’s color frame blow-ups, for some reason, were not as crisp as those in its larger counterpart. You’d have thought it would be the other way around.) And, a year on, a notorious bomb of a live, sparsely attended television “party” at Madison Square Garden, financed by and celebrating Mike Todd. It’s included on the Warner Around the World DVD, and I defy you to get through the whole thing.

There were also, in addition to an Avon paperback tie-in (profusely illustrated, as they used to say, with stills), two editions, from Random House, of a pasteboard souvenir book, one large, one digest-sized. (Although nearly identical in content and illustration, the smaller version’s color frame blow-ups, for some reason, were not as crisp as those in its larger counterpart. You’d have thought it would be the other way around.) And, a year on, a notorious bomb of a live, sparsely attended television “party” at Madison Square Garden, financed by and celebrating Mike Todd. It’s included on the Warner Around the World DVD, and I defy you to get through it.

The movie’s director, Michael Anderson, confers on-set with Mike Todd, presumably over how best to frame Sinatra’s cameo.

During his brief career in movies, Todd initiated the superb wide-screen alternative to Cinerama that would eventually bear his name (Todd-AO), coined the term “cameo” for those starry bit roles, won Elizabeth Taylor’s hand, and snagged the gold ring on his very first production. He was uncouth, vulgar, at least provisionally heartless, and quite possibly dangerous. (When Todd’s ex-wife Joan Blondell, whom he once allegedly held out a Manhattan window, heard that he had died in a plane crash two years later she snapped, “I hope the son of a bitch screamed the whole way down.”) Yet, somehow, he knew how to charm and corral talent and, having hooked them, respected their gifts. That fact shines through every frame of his movie.

Fogg finds true love when Auoda discusses with him the finer points of whist.

*$42,000,000 profit on a then jaw-dropping $6 million budget.

Text copyright 2014, 2022 by Scott Ross

Bazzaz: “Funny Face” (1957)

Standard

By Scott Ross

Fred Astaire’s last major (and penultimate) musical, an exercise in style that, somewhat shockingly, was a financial disappointment on its release; it returned a profit only when re-issued following the success of My Fair Lady, which like Funny Face also starred Audrey Hepburn in the distaff lead. It’s one of the many pictures in which Hepburn appeared that paired her with an older man; indeed, in all of her major roles before Green Mansions and Breakfast at Tiffany’s (and several after) her co-stars were significantly older than she. I wonder if her almost preternatural poise and aura of maturity led to this? In any case, as a heterosexual version of Richard Avedon, Astaire is three decades too old for her, and looks it, as Gary Cooper would also do a year later for Billy Wilder in the otherwise perfect romantic comedy Love in the Afternoon. Somehow she makes an odd cinematic recurrence work.

Not a singer — or, if you prefer, a singer with a tiny range — Hepburn also makes her liabilities work, for her, and her awe-struck rendition of “How Long Has This Been Going On?” is one of the most charming vocal performances in movie musicals. (The heroic sound editors who stitched together her various takes into a tuneful whole have something to do with it as well.) Of course, today’s audience for Funny Face… always assuming there is one… would doubtless squeal with outrage at the cause of her singing: Astaire kissing her. (This even as they defend the Hair-Sniffer-in-Chief for his latest groping of some poor young girl.) And if the picture carries with it a slight whiff of anti-intellectualism, which its director, Stanley Donen, claimed was never the intention, it’s filled with marvels: A (mostly) Gershwin score; Astaire and Hepburn dancing among swans to “He Loves and She Loves” and “‘S Wonderful”; Hepburn’s marvelous abstract number in a Left Bank bistro while clad in chic black with white socks; Fred serenading Audrey with the title song under a red dark-room safe-light while developing a close-up of her; Astaire’s mock bullfight to “Let’s Kiss and Make Up,” during which he sends an umbrella sailing through the air to land with precision in a Parisian ash-can; and Kay Thompson in everything she does.

“Clap Yo’ Hands”: Astaire accompanying the great Kay Thompson.

Thompson, a superb singer, was also a great vocal arranger, with a hip, hand-clapping, finger-snapping style that enlivened any number of otherwise indifferent movie musicals. (She was also the author of the beloved Eloise books, and launched the Williams Brothers, not incidentally landing Andy as her lover for many years.) In Funny Face she proves a comedienne of wit, and one of the truly great musical performers. Playing a dry, acerbic women’s fashion magazine editor based either on Diana Vreeland —and the Harper’s Bazaar editor-in-chief Carmel Snow depending upon which source you consult —Thompson opens the picture smartly in the visually imaginative “Think Pink!” number, strides around the City of Light as if she owns it during “Bonjour, Paris!” and, with Astaire, sings and dances an incendiary “Clap Yo’ Hands” as a diversion while they scheme to “rescue” Hepburn from the French philosopher she idolizes. If Astaire was, as has been reported, uncomfortable working with an aggressive female performer like Thompson, in “Clap Yo’ Hands” he not only doesn’t betray those feelings but appears to be fully immersed in her style, kicking both sides of his guitar as rhythmic punctuation, falling to the floor in slow motion, kicking up his feet as he lies on his back and, at one point, literally screaming his enthusiasm. “Clap Yo’ Hands” wasn’t written for Thompson but it could have been; it’s virtually a personification of her style.

Fred and his sister Adele in the 1927 Funny Face.

Although the movie employs the title of the 1927 Fred and Adele Astaire stage musical and several of its Gershwin songs (“Clap Yo’ Hands” came from Oh, Kay!) the plot has nothing to do with that brother-and-sister show. In fact, the felicitously-surnamed Leonard Gershe based his screenplay on his own Broadway musical Wedding Bells. While his satire on post-war philosophie française, here something called “empathicalism,” is a bit wan (its originator is, as Astaire’s character intuits, a womanizing phony) Gershe doesn’t stint on satirizing haute couture either. In this he is amusingly abetted by Donen and Avedon, the picture’s visual consultant. The split-screen images in “Think Pink!” are fun, and in their brevity and wit a definite improvement on the screen fashion show that is the only bad sequence in Singin’ in the Rain, and which Donen co-directed. But the actual fashion shoots, in which the reluctant intellectual played by Hepburn is coached by Astaire’s photographer, a sort of Stanislavsky of the high fashion set, are both amusing and exciting, especially the bit where Hepburn in a rich, red gown with cape evokes the Winged Victory at the Louvre.

“Take the picture! Take the picture!”

Funny Face is slight — a VistaVision trifle — but like that layered dessert provides enormous pleasure and, for those who are new to it, the surprise of discovery. With the exception of Hepburn (the reason the picture was made at Paramount) it’s like a great, sparkling Arthur Freed MGM musical lacking only Freed himself: It was produced by his associate, Roger Edens; the music was orchestrated by people like Alexander Courage, Skip Martin and Conrad Salinger; the numbers choreographed by Astaire and Eugene Loring; and the whole of it wrapped up in Ray June’s glorious color cinematography which, unusually for the period (and perhaps inspired by John Huston and Oswald Morris’ work on Moulin Rouge) includes two musical sequences shot seemingly through the then-ubiquitous cigarette smoke of 1950s La Rive Gauche. Edith Head designed the often humorous costumes while Hubert de Givenchy, naturally, came up with Hepburn’s Parisian wardrobe.

Gershe, incidentally, altered Diana Vreeland’s famous neologism “bazzaz” in his script as “pizzaz,” which despite the movie’s financial failure somehow stuck; everyone today pronounces the word as “pizzaz.” Even Vreeland herself once said she wished she’d used a “p” instead of a “b.”

Text copyright 2022 by Scott Ross

Monthly Report: August 2022

Standard

By Scott Ross

As ever, click the links on the capsules for the complete reviews.

Nuts (1987) Tom Topor’s incendiary courtroom drama, adapted by Darryl Ponicsan, Alvin Sargent and the playwright, nicely directed by Martin Ritt and featuring a superb central performance by Barbra Streisand. Streisand plays Claudia Draper, a high-class call-girl facing a sanity hearing for having killed a client in self-defense, and the role allows her to use everything she’d learned as an actress. Claudia is angry, bitter, sarcastic, witty, strident and vulnerable in turns, and Streisand gives in to her completely. Andrzej Bartkowiak’s rich cinematography almost camouflages the movie’s artificial theatricality (it’s a story played out entirely in interiors, until the miscalculated ending) and the splendid cast includes Richard Dreyfuss as Claudia’s acerbic court-appointed advocate, Maureen Stapleton as her bewildered mother, Karl Malden as her self-serving father, Eli Wallach as the jailhouse shrink determined to see her put away as a mental case, Robert Webber as opposing counsel, James Whitmore as the judge and Leslie Nielsen as a dangerous trick. The undeniably emotionally satisfying ending makes absolutely no sense, but Streisand almost makes you believe that it does.


Pollyanna (1960) Regarded in some circles as unbearably treacly and sentimental, this adaptation by the screenwriter/director David Swift of Eleanor H. Porter’s novel is the most charming of live-action Disney movies, with a star-making central performance by Haley Mills and a wonderful cast of old pros including Jane Wyman, Nancy Olsen, Adolph Menjou, Reta Shaw, Edward Platt and, although he is (as he nearly always tended to be) a bit much, Karl Malden. Best of all is the great Agnes Moorehead as a hypochondriacal termagant. She’s so good she steals scenes from a child.

Russell Harlan’s cinematography is pleasing, the art direction (Carroll Clark and Robert Clatworthy), set decoration (Emile Kuri and Fred M. MacLean) and costumes (Walter Plunkett) are fulsome, Peter Ellenshaw and Ub Iwerks’ visual effects are often delightful and even Kevin Corchoran is not as annoying as usual. But… wasn’t there one single happy person in that town who didn’t need Pollyanna to show him the way?


Hello, Dolly! (1969) One of the last of the big, bloated movie musicals of the 1960s, one of the most expensive, and one of the least pleasurable. Carol Channing may have thought her baffling Oscar nomination for Thoroughly Modern Millie gave her the lock on re-creating her Broadway performance but I doubt she (or indeed any of the subsequent Dollys) ever had a chance. I don’t know who could, or should, have played the role but there was only one certified musical star other than Julie Andrews when the picture was being planned, and while Streisand’s casting made no practical sense — Dolly Gallagher Levi is middle-aged, a widow of long standing and, despite her married name, an Irish gentile — it made perfect corporate sense. Still, when the entire Harmonia Gardens staff goes gaga over Dolly’s return you have to wonder: When was she last there? At 16?

Even on a home-screen you can see the tens of millions of dollars 20th Century-Fox threw at the picture, what with the thousands (not mere hundreds) of period costumes, the opulent Harmonia Gardens set, the massive 14th Street parade ground on which the first act finale takes place, the parade itself, and the backward panning crane shot with which Part One of the picture ends, which must have been impressive as hell on a big theatrical screen. But impressive is all it is. There’s not an ounce of humanity in the movie and not even any good musical numbers. I don’t mean the songs themselves — we can argue endlessly about the quality of Jerry Herman’s music and lyrics and never reach a conclusion* — but the planning, choreography and execution of them. They’re nearly all huge, as if the size of them was equated to excellence by the people working on the movie. Even an intimate item like “Dancing” spills out into a park and becomes a Big Number involving seemingly dozens of couples gamboling all over the place as if in search of the Graustark operetta they’ve wandered in from. And this from Gene Kelly (the director) and Michael Kidd (the choreographer), both of whom cut their creative teeth on character-driven things like Singin’ in the Rain and Guys and Dolls. The title song is staged and performed as if on a proscenium stage and has a dead, canned quality alleviated only by the all-too-brief duet between Streisand and Louis Armstrong, roped into the proceedings because his recording of the song had been such a massive hit. The only dance that almost works, “The Waiters’ Gallop,” wears out its welcome early and the only songs that land are Streisand’s: “Just Leave Everything to Me,” which replaced the original opening number; the ballad “Love is Only Love” (originally written for Mame) in which she is beautifully lit by Harry Stradling; and “So Long, Dearie,” Dolly’s high-powered ersatz farewell to the curmudgeonly Yonkers merchant she plans to marry. The rest are handled by people like Michael Crawford, whose anemic mewling can give a listener the shudders. At least the music sounds good, or as good anyway as Jerry Herman’s music ever sounds; that old MGM hand Lennie Hayton did the orchestrations and Lionel Newman scored and conducted.

Streisand, cognizant of how wrong she was for the role, plays Dolly in two modes: Full-tilt, like the Gay 90s equivalent of a steamroller, and in imitation of Mae West. As the object of her unfathomable machinations, Walter Matthau seems to be channeling W.C. Fields. (In life, to use Orson Welles’ felicitous phrase, the pair loathed each other.) Aside from Streisand when she’s singing, the compensatory factors in Hello, Dolly! are Armstrong, Judy Knaiz as Dolly’s actress pal Gussie Granger, Marianne McAndrew as Irene Malloy (although she does not do her own singing) and poor, doomed Danny Lockin as Barnaby Tucker. What happened to this talented, personable young performer was sickening, but how the crime was adjudicated was even worse. When you know the person whose performance you’re enjoying was murdered, horrifically, while his killer later died in his bed, it tends to cast a pall over that enjoyment.


Monkeys, Go Home! (1967) A silly, amiable Disney comedy based by the screenwriter Maurice Tombrage on a moderately amusing G.K. Wilkinson novel concerning the heir to a rural Provence property who brings in a quartet of female chimps to harvest his olives, and the efforts of a few villagers to thwart him, for their own political and personal reasons. Wilkinson makes explicit that the meanies are Communists. Disney soft-pedals that, but you can figure it out if you read between the shaky lines.

Dean Jones, the best thing about so many Disney comedies of the 1960s and ’70s, does more or less what you might expect with his role, and if you like what he does (which I do) he’s almost enough to make watching the picture worthwhile. Maurice Chevalier is pleasing as the local priest, Jules Munshin has a nice small role as an olive buyer, Yvonne Constant a very funny moment when she wakes to what she thinks are the ghosts of her uncle’s dead wives, and Yvette Mimieux is utterly adorable as Jones’ eventual inamorata. I was also amused to see Jones driving around in a 1967 Renault, the same make, although not the same model, as my first teenage car. Although the Provençal locations are lovely, the picture is the sort of thing that worked as well in a two-part commercial television broadcast on “The Wonderful World of Disney” as it does on Blu-ray… which is I suppose both the best and the worst that can be said of it.


The In-Laws (1979) and Used Cars (1980) Two achingly funny movie farces from an era not especially known for its great comedies.


What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael (2018) If you are an admirer of Kael’s writing, you may feel there is a great documentary to be made about it, and her. This, for several reasons, isn’t it.

First, that terrible title. Although Kael was occasionally interviewed for television (we see some interview footage of her in this movie but not nearly enough) it was not what she said that mattered, but what she wrote. Second, the interviewees. I have no quarrel with these including David Edelstein, Greil Marcus, Craig Seligman (who wrote an interesting book on Kale and Susan Sontag), her biographer Brian Kellow, James Wolcott, Phillip Lopate, Kael’s sometime pet Paul Schrader, the screenwriter Robert Towne, the writer-director John Boorman or even the dubious Molly Haskell or that ravening macaw with Tourette’s, Camille Paglia. But explain to me please what possible relevance to Kael, or to the movies she wrote about, the likes of Alec Baldwin and Quentin Tarantino might have? Why can nothing now be said or written about old movies without Tarantino’s imprimatur? Third, the voices. One of the most dispiriting trends in documentary-making over the past two decades is the “enacting” of voices, almost never with any accuracy and usually performed with eye-rolling hamminess by hack actors who think they’re great impersonators. Here we get Mike Pollock pretending to be Gregory Peck, Joel Haberli’s risible imitations of Wallace Shawn and George Roy Hill, Michael Bryan’s anemic Kevin Bacon, Amanda Sykes out-parodying Madeline Kahn as Marlene Dietrich, Cliff Resnick’s annoying Steven Spielberg and the movie’s director Rob Garver doing a Woody Allen that wouldn’t pass muster on Amateur Night. Sarah Jessica Parker’s reading of Kael’s words at least provides a reasonable facsimile of her distinctive tones and is anyway more interested in the words themselves than in slavish impersonation.

That Garver made the movie at all certainly speaks to his devotion to Kael’s writing. Yet What She Said is purely surface-oriented. Example: While Garver identifies the father of Kael’s daughter — the poet, experimental filmmaker and “radical faerie” James Broughton — he elides entirely over who Broughton was. He takes greater care with the seeming hundreds of film clips, most of them entirely unrelated to Kael or her writing, than with the woman herself. What Garver gets right is including extensive quotations from Kael’s reviews, the whole purpose of the enterprise. But you would, I think, get as much from reading a critical study of her work, or Kellow’s fine 2011 biography (Pauline Kael: A Life in the Dark) and infinitely more from sitting down with her books. Or is that, in the 21st century, asking too goddamned much?


*Interestingly, Hello, Dolly‘s best songs were written either by someone else (Bob Merrill’s “Elegance,” composed originally for New Girl in Town, and the amusing “Motherhood March,” which isn’t in the movie) or based on the work of others (“Before the Parade Passes By,” from an identically-titled number commissioned from Charles Strouse and Lee Adams out of town). According to Steven Suskin, all three men received royalty payments from the David Merrick office throughout the run of the show… and, presumably, in perpetuity from Tams-Whitmark, the musical’s licensing agent.

Text copyright 2022 by Scott Ross

Two for two: “The In-Laws” (1979) and “Used Cars” (1980)

Standard

By Scott Ross

Recently I had occasion, in considering Warren Beatty and Shampoo, to lament how few great comedies were made in the 1970s, a decade otherwise filled with recurrent wonders at the movies. How I forgot two of the best comic pictures from the close of that era I don’t know. The In-Laws, released in the summer of ’79, fell within a time when I was adrift and deeply anxious about my future, which may have had something to do with it receding in my memory. Used Cars, in theaters a little over a year later, I simply missed because it wasn’t in release long enough for me to get to it; I only caught up with it on video cassette in the late 1980s after plowing through all of Pauline Kael’s books and viewing as many of the movies she recommended and which I hadn’t seen as I could. I suspect in retrospect that my faulty memory had somehow lumped Used Cars in with movies that were made much later in the ’80s, when its form of comic outrage had become more common, if completely without its wit and originality and with a surfeit of gross-out gags and an accent on big-titted female bimbos in scanty clothing and the horny young dopes who pursue them. (Used Cars also uses female pulchritude in a comic way, not out of prurience but to illustrate its character’s sheer outrageousness.)

Re-viewing these two hilariously nut-brained farces recently on Blu-ray I realized that not only are they great original comedies but that both rank among the funniest movies of my experience. (I nearly died laughing at one of them, and not figuratively. More on that anon…) My reaction to The In-Laws in particular leads me to ruminate, as I have so often in my life, on the vagaries of human memory. How could anything that provides this much pleasure, and which is this gut-bustingly funny, register only vaguely in my movie memory? Well, that is why the gods made the Blu-ray player: To allow us to retrieve our memories and correct old misperceptions.


The In-Laws represents the triumph not of competent hack directing but of genuinely original screenwriting and utterly perfect comic acting. (The filmmaker here was Arthur Hiller, whose only other great pictures were also great in their screenplays: The Americanization of Emily and The Hospital, both by Paddy Chayefsky.) Andrew Bergman’s script, unlike most of the contemporary comedies which came before it — and nearly all of those that came after — is dazzlingly, deliriously funny from its comic heist beginning to its charmingly larcenous end. And while the cast brims with splendid comedic actors, from Peter Falk to Richard Libertini, Falk’s co-star Alan Arkin represents something far above mere inspiration. As Sheldon Kornpett D.D.S., whose life is turned upside-down by the prospective in-law played by Falk, Arkin gives a performance so perfectly timed and calibrated he gets deep belly-laughs from prosaic lines like, “Get out of my life!” Almost everything he does and says is not merely funny but riotously, achingly, side-splittingly funny. Sheldon is the upper middle-class emblem for every Jewish mother who dreamed of her son, the doctor; nominally neurotic before meeting Falk’s Vince Ricardo, he’s driven into such extremes of hysteria, panic and despair by his daughter’s seemingly unhinged father-in-law-to-be that he comes out of the other side of their shared experience as a man transformed.

Astonishingly for anyone who, like me, grew up seeing Arkin in comic roles in movies, on the Criterion Blu-ray commentary the actor says that he was unsure of himself as a comedic actor until after he made The In-Laws. Like Jack Lemmon, Arkin can get laughs by raising an eyebrow, and his reactions serve to make his fellow comedians even funnier: When Libertini as a South American dictator with a penchant for imitating Señor Wences makes a show of kissing Sheldon’s mouth with his fist, the unbelieving sideways look Arkin gives him makes an already funny bit hilarious,* just as his attitudes of despondency allow James Hong as a small airplane pilot-cum-steward nattering away happily in Mandarin seem even more delirious. The more Vince pushes at the limits of Shelley’s nervous understatement, the more Arkin’s hysteria builds and the funnier he becomes, so that simple declarative outbursts in Arkin’s hands rise to a comic level very close to the sublime. And even as Shelley begins to loosen up and actually enjoy the insane adventure Vince has drawn him into, he’s still hysterical, still the outraged little bourgeois dentist, and that duality becomes the comic engine driving the character. By the time Arkin and Falk are up against the wall and about to be shot by a firing squad Shelley’s hysteria runs in two directions at once: Despair and hilarity exist side by side, and are equally uproarious. Arkin’s performance ranks with the great comedic sound performances by male actors in American movies.

Falk in a way (or at least on the surface) has the easier ride. Vince is as unflappable as Lt. Columbo at his most impassive, and if you were an admirer of the actor and a fan of his television series you might be forgiven at first for thinking you’ve seen this performance before. But a spirit of antic invention resides beneath the sang-froid; Falk’s Vince Ricardo is like Columbo pushed into the realm of self-parody. He’s so adaptable he’s almost liquid, and nothing fazes him, not even facing his own imminent execution. (Of course, Vince knows a great deal more than Shelley, which accounts for some of his placidity.) If Vince wasn’t so blasé, if his approach to every fresh catastrophe was not a shrug, Shelley’s hysterical reactions to circumstances would not be as funny. There’s a marvelous scene in the last third of the picture where Shelley attempts to get away from Vince and the seedy hotel he’s ensconced them in where chickens walk around as if they own the place and when Arkin runs Falk tackles him and wrestles him to the floor. That is funny enough, but when they repeat the same actions a moment later what was amusing the first time becomes wildly funny the second. Yet their actions are perfectly logical for each, and the contrast between the two, equally extreme, polarities of personality is what makes the pairing work. The give-and-take between Falk and Arkin is, aside from Bergman’s comic brilliance at dialogue and structure, what makes the individual sequences hilarious. Probably the best example of this is the long, achingly funny scene in a New York diner in which Vince, with his preternatural calm, piles one verbal outrage on top of another, triggering Shelley to a series of frenzied responses. By the time he is screaming at Vince, entirely oblivious of the other patrons (who, needless to say, are hanging on every word of their exchange) I found myself alternatively roaring with laughter at the behavior of the actors and grinning at the dazzlement of the dialogue and the uncanny assurance of its writer.

Before writing The In-Laws Andrew Bergman, whose excellent dissertation We’re in the Money: Depression America and Its Films was published in 1971, wrote the entertaining (if excessively fag-bashing) Jack LeVine series of hard-boiled mysteries and the original screenplay Tex X, which became (with his active if overshadowed collaboration) Mel Brooks’ Helzapoppin Western spoof Blazing Saddles. Yet nothing in Bergman’s dramatic output quite prepares you for the beauty of The In-Laws. Aside from how funny it is — and it’s much funnier than the Brooks movie — I’ve seldom seen a better structured modern comedy. The individual scenes are beautifully conceived, and shaped, and they coalesce in a wonderful way, each sequence folding perfectly into the next with a logic that is both utterly insane yet entirely rational. Take that hoary caper cliché, the formula automotive chase: Perhaps due to the success of What’s Up, Doc?, in the ’70s such chases were almost de rigeur in movie comedies, and most of them fell flat, sometimes taking entire otherwise enjoyable movies with them. Here, the chase is as unpredictable as everything in the picture, and the details — Shelley, having seemingly given up, lying on a mountain of oranges in the plaza fruit market; the mobile unloading of a truckful of bananas onto the roadway — continue accruing, causing you to laugh at the movie’s sheer, clever audaciousness. It’s clearly a writer’s movie (actually a writer’s and actor’s movie) and Arthur Hiller’s competent, flavorless direction, like the bouncy John Morris score, is exactly what’s needed, its very ordinariness the perfect setting for the two comic jewels at its center. Style in movies isn’t always a matter of directorial flourish; with The In-Laws the style lies in that wonderful screenplay, and in the lead actors’ performances. If a better director had made the picture he might have interfered fatally with what makes it work.


Like The In-Laws, Used Cars, written by Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale and directed by Zemeckis, likewise has a solid structure and is, if anything, even crazier. A roaring satire on the antics and practices of used car dealerships, it throws nearly everything at the premise and most of it is wildly, blissfully funny. The only place in the picture where the laughter sags a bit is during the climactic race across the desert, but the rest of it is good, dirty fun without recourse to mean-spiritedness. Once you get the measure of Kurt Russell’s amoral Randy Russo and how far he and his equally unprincipled staff will go just to get one lemon off the lot and into the hands of a gullible customer you know they’ll stop at little short of murder to do it, and you eagerly await their next outrage. (The slyly named Roy L. Fuchs, Russo’s rival and the twin brother of his establishment’s owner Luke Fuchs — both are played by Jack Warden — doesn’t scruple to any limits, including homicide; hoping to get his mitts on his brother’s land, Roy has one of his employees cause Luke a fatal coronary.)

According to Zemeckis and Gale the studio mishandled Used Cars, which should have been one of its year’s most popular comedies, through poor distribution.† What was lost in that miscalculation was not only the movie itself but Kurt Russell’s marvelous performance in it. For moviegoers of my generation, Russell was that handsome, likable kid in the Disney comedies; he wasn’t taken very seriously by adults and other critics but then I don’t suppose any of the adolescents who were my peers took him seriously either, although his portrayals, on television, of Charles Whitman and Elvis Presley were well received. The Disney comedies were of so little consequence it was difficult to gauge Russell’s potential, and I doubt anyone was prepared for how gleefully he gave of himself in Used Cars. Russell throws himself into Russo’s antics completely, never winking at the audience that, really, he’s a good guy: Russo knows that scamming the auto-buying public is small potatoes, done almost for the fun of it; his real ambition is to go into politics (for which by dint of his innate and reflexive crookedness he is more than eminently qualified) and he’s saving up the cash to pay off the local machine for his initial legislative seat. Zemeckis once characterized Used Cars as “a Frank Capra movie where everybody lies.” Randy Russo is hardly Jefferson Smith, but he isn’t Senator Paine either — although if Paine had one he could be a brash, conniving young nephew. Russo might not drive a carload of young boys off the road but he’d probably have the motor tinkered with so the engine would fall out on the tarmac.

Gerrit Graham and Toby (real name: Peanuts)

Russo’s team is as cheerfully amoral as the boss. Jeff (Gerrit Graham) an inveterate horndog driven nearly crazy by ridiculous superstitions also has, as an accomplice, an adorably corrupt beagle called Toby and is not above setting customers up by pretending they’ve driven over Toby and playing the weeping little boy (“Mister, you ran over my dog!”). Jim the mechanic (Frank McRae) meanwhile is a sleepy black giant whose narcolepsy strikes without warning, usually when he’s in the middle of a job. Then there’s the videographer Freddie (David L. Lander) and his accomplice Eddie (Michael McKean) who’s an electronic genius and who facilitates the wild, FCC-defying live advertisements Russo stages during high-profile televised athletic and political events. Much of the fun of Used Cars lies in its piling up of comic outrage and the wilder the tactic Russo and his salesmen employ, the funnier it becomes. This extends to things we don’t actually see in the picture… which is why I very nearly died laughing at it: When one of Russo’s video stunts blows up in his face and Royal Fuchs takes an angry moral slant on it, Russo complains that nuns were protesting outside the dealership. “I had to get Jim to turn the fire house on them,” he says, and it was then I choked on my homemade chicken soup. But there was worse to come; I’d barely cleared the offending strand of white meat from my windpipe and taken another spoonful when McRae drawled out the casually indecent line that topped Russell’s and I found myself choking again. This hasn’t happened to me since the night several years ago on which I watched a certain comic documentary while wolfing down a mushroom pizza and was forced by that brush with mortality to imagine the next day’s small obituary headline: “Local writer killed by The Aristocrats.”


Among the many pleasures offered by both pictures are their wonderful supporting casts. In addition to Richard Libertini and James Hong, The In-Laws features nice turns by Nancy Dussault and Arlene Golonka as, respectively, Arkin’s and Falk’s spouses; a young Richard Paymer as an accommodating New York cabbie; Penny Pyser’s delightful performance as the bride-to-be; Sammy Smith as a philosophical patient; and Ed Bagley Jr. as an hilariously imperturbable CIA man. Used Cars offers, apart from Russell’s perfectly judged performance, the charming Deborah Harmon as Luke Fuch’s estranged daughter; the underrated Joe Flaherty as a dispassionately corrupt city employee; Dick Miller in a funny cameo; Betty Thomas (of all people) as a stripper; Wendie Jo Sperber as a monumentally uncertain high school student-driver; Dub Taylor as a political machine fixer; and, as if one Jack Warden were not cause for the usual level of celebration, two of him. The crowning glory, however, is the great Al Lewis as a local magistrate called “The Hanging Judge” whose bench is decorated with miniature capital punishment devices. That’s no more rooted in reality than a South American dictator going into a Señor Wences routine, but it’s every bit as funny.

Two final notes: 1) Unlike Zemeckis, Gale and Russell on the Blu-ray commentary, I do not find the sight of Warden as Luke Fuchs suffering an all-too-realistic heart attack hilarious. I hope their hysterical reaction had more to do with their memories of working with Warden than with the sight of an old man in the throes of cardiac arrest, but you never know.

2) It’s always a little disconcerting to see, usually in older movies, performers risking their lives and limbs for a shot, and in both The In-Laws and Used Cars the leading actors — Arkin in the first instance, Russell in the second — perform stunts in or on moving vehicles that are obviously not faked. Although Arkin’s double leaps onto the roof of a South American taxicab, it’s Arkin we see clinging to it and his look is, for once in the movie, unreadable: The rictus on his face could be the character’s slightly smug grimace of triumph, or the actor’s understated expression of terror. There’s also a sight gag in Used Cars involving the tailgate of a station wagon which, when you consider that young boys were involved, is appalling. It’s also one of the funniest bits in the movie, and elicits a roar of laughter no matter how many times you’ve seen it.

There’s some sort of moral or ethical conundrum wrapped up in that observation but just what it portends may be too unsettling to unravel.


*Libertini, with whom Arkin had worked onstage, was trying to make his co-star break up, and Arkin was equally determined not to.

Used Cars also couldn’t compete with that season’s big hit comedy, Airplane!

Text copyright 2022 by Scott Ross