Bellissimo!: “Moonstruck” (1987)

Standard

By Scott Ross

In the late ’80s, after a decade of sour, smart-ass movies, most an outgrowth of the popularity of television’s Saturday Night and nearly all of which militantly eschewed romance, at least as an adult would recognize it, Moonstruck seemed like a gift from the Gods: A bright, funny and emotionally centered romantic comedy full of wonderful characters and delightful actors, a narrative arc that while modest was at the same time intelligent, fulsome and satisfying, and the unmistakable feel of talented people engaged in work that inspired them. The picture was a lush Valentine, and although the studio didn’t think much of it, its audiences were ecstatic.

They had every reason to be. John Patrick Shanley’s original script was intended to be a play, and could have been very effective in that form, although nothing in it is noticeably stagy or artificial, and it’s deeply pleasurable. While the movie is not remotely realistic — indeed, its romantic naturalism is a large part of its charm — its oddball characters are quirky in an entirely human way. And the actors make them shimmer, from Cher in the leading role of a widowed, self-styled frump avoiding romance because she believes her first marriage was cursed to Gina DeAngeles as a bitter old woman Cher encounters at the airport and who gets one of the picture’s biggest laughs. Shanley’s background, of course, is Irish, but he observed Italians closely from an early age and it seems to me he gets the details right, albeit refracted through the prism of a gentle, slightly screwball comedy. I don’t think Norman Jewison’s direction could be improved upon, nor Lou Lombardo’s sprightly editing, and David Watkin’s rich, warm cinematography is the perfect complement to the movie’s close-knit family milieu.

The perfect cast, nearly every one of whom contributes at least one small bit of comic greatness, includes Olympia Dukakis as the wife and mother certain her husband is philandering and who gets a lovely moment of lightly flirting connection with a stranger at a neighborhood restaurant; Vincent Gardenia as her wayward mate, convinced that a midlife affair will forestall death; Danny Aiello as the hag-ridden mama’s boy to whom Cher is engaged; Julie Bovasso and Louis Guss as her erotically playful aunt and uncle; John Mahoney, both melancholy and amusing as a communications professor unable to communicate with the female students he is perpetually drawn to; the adorable Anita Gillette as Gardenia’s plump little dumpling of a paramour; and Feodor Chaliapin Jr. as the family’s ancient grandfather, as besotted by that big, cheesy moon over Brooklyn as his granddaughter and whose shining face as he extols “La bella luna” becomes the rhapsodic spirit of the picture.

Nicholas Cage has never been a favorite of mine; he strikes me as one of those troubled figures who, if he didn’t have acting as an outlet, would probably either harm himself or end up in a padded room. Cher envisioned him in the role of her unexpected inamorata, lobbied hard for his casting (she threatened to pull out of the picture if he wasn’t in it) and she was right. Cage somehow manages to bring a warmth and sweetness as well as an edge of dangerous rage to the part of the embittered baker that coalesce and resolve into something very close to lovable, a word I don’t think I’ve ever associated with Cage outside of this movie.

As Loretta, who has convinced herself that not marrying her deceased husband in a church somehow caused his accidental death and who is afraid to make herself vulnerable again, only to find love in the unlikeliest place and with, seemingly, the least apposite of men, Cher is utterly luminous. This is not an ugly duckling role —  Loretta isn’t unattractive, she simply doesn’t care enough to cultivate her natural pulchritude — but Cher is as convincing in the movie’s first half, with her graying, stringy curls and thick eyebrows as she is when she gives in to her buried romanticism and indulges in a Cinderella makeover. (Literally: The salon she frequents is called Cinderella.) When, on the street facing Cage and her own warring emotions (and, reportedly, freezing in the New York cold) she looks up with her great, shining doe eyes, the snow softly falling in an echo of La bohème, the opera they’ve just seen, she is the embodiment of romantic hope in a world that, when not suppressing love, does little to encourage it. And she gets one of the great moments in American movie comedy when Cage’s one-handed baker confesses he loves her and she slaps his face and barks, “Snap out of it!” This was a line you heard quoted over and over in the late ’80s, and for good reason: It summed up both Loretta’s unyielding pragmatism and a national mood of cynicism that couldn’t quite believe in the possibility of love, even as it longed rather desperately for it.

Moonstruck somehow encapsulated that desire, and gave an audience as starved for romantic comedy as for romance itself, an outlet for its yearning. That no Hollywood studio capitalized on that rather obvious niche is unsurprising; whenever an odd movie breaks out of the cookie-cutter mold, defies the odds and connects with a large swath of ticket-buyers it gets labeled “a non-recurring phenomenon.” That almost no other contemporary screenwriters or directors bothered (quick: name the great romantic comedies since) says something else entirely, about them.

Copyright 2020 by Scott Ross

Bimonthly Report: October – November 2020

Standard

By Scott Ross

I spent all of November and a good portion of October either preparing for a move or actually moving, and doing so entirely on my own while simultaneously holding down a full-time job. As a result there was little time to indulge in movie-watching, or much energy left over even for that, and certainly none for writing.

I trust a panting world was somehow able to contain its keen impatience.

OCTOBER

The Bride of Frankenstein (1935) James Whale’s follow-up to Frankenstein is a wild black-comedy-cum-horror masterpiece with a vivid, outré sensibility little understood at the time, although the picture was hugely popular.


The Shocking Miss Pilgrim (1946) A flawed but charming period musical which, perhaps taking a cue from the contemporaneous Harold Arlen/E.Y. Harburg Bloomer Girl, concerned itself with, of all things, women’s rights and the suffrage movement. The best thing about the picture is its song score, the music consisting of “trunk” tunes by George Gershwin, selected by Ira Gershwin and Kay Swift and knitted together by Ira’s new lyrics. Although the story’s 1870s setting obviously made no room for George’s “hot,” blue sound, the songs are consistently effervescent and the lyrics delightfully in character. There’s lilt in “For You, For Me, For Evermore,” barkless bite in “The Back Bay Polka,” a pleasing bit of innuendo in the duet “Aren’t You Kind of Glad We Did”? (what they “did” was dine without a chaperone) and I’m especially taken with the line, “It’s a human world once more” in “Changing My Tune.” If Betty Grable is stuck for the movie’s running time in those bustles and crinolines, the movie’s writer and director George Seaton cleverly permits her to lift her skirt and display those famous gams at least once.

Where the picture errs is not in rejecting the grim qualities of its source, a story by Ernest Maas and Frederica Sagor bearing the witty title “Miss Pilgrim’s Progress” but in being too brief to do complete justice to Cynthia Pilgrim herself. Just as she’s building up to an important political show-down, the romance between her and the lugubrious Dick Haymes blows up and the matter is dropped entirely in favor of a smart but predictable finale. You get the sense there was a fair amount left on the cutting-room floor. Worse, there is too little of Anne Revere as Haymes’ suffragist aunt and Elisabeth Risdon as his understanding mother and all too much of Haymes himself with a patented Crosbyesque croon in his voice and that unprepossessing look of a dirty elf in his face. At one point he pleads with Grable in song from a looking glass. Although the effect is done well, would you want that face staring back at you from your mirror?


Frankenstein (1931) / Son of Frankenstein (1939) / The Ghost of Frankenstein (1942) / The House of Frankenstein (1944) In an act of admitted madness, I watched all of these, plus The Bride of Frankenstein, over the Hallowe’en weekend.

God, if he exists, may or may not have mercy on my soul, but I don’t think my brain will ever be the same.


NOVEMBER

The Assassination Bureau (1969) A stylish, sumptuous-looking adaptation of Jack London’s unfinished, and very funny, short novel. It’s somewhat muddled in altering the main characters, and miscasting Oliver Reed as the head of the eponymous organization rather than his co-star Telly Savalas, or even Curd Jürgens, who plays a supporting role, either of whom would more happily have resembled the character in London’s comic/philosophical fiction. Reed acquits himself amiably, however, and there can be no complaints about a delectable Diana Rigg as his feminine vis-à-vis, nor about Ron Grainer’s buoyant score or Basil Deardon’s efficient direction. The picture, written by Michael Relph, isn’t as philosophical or as cleverly worked-out as the novel and some of the special effects, especially the rear-screen projection, are poor. But the movie is fun, if only in a disposable fashion. London’s book, by the way, was completed by Robert L. Fish who, as “Robert L. Pike” (get it?) also wrote the marginally compelling 1963 New York City police procedural Mute Witness, which somehow inexplicably became an exciting San Francisco movie called Bullitt.


Our Man in Havana (1959) Graham Greene’s black-comedy novel made into a likeable but ultimately unsatisfying movie. I can’t quite put my finger on why it doesn’t work, although Greene’s rather surprising refusal to depict the Batista government’s brutality reduces the stakes. (Greene: “In poking fun at the British Secret Service, I had minimized the terror of Batista’s rule. I had not wanted too black a background for a light-hearted comedy, but those who suffered during the years of dictatorship could hardly be expected to appreciate that my real subject was the absurdity of the British agent and not the justice of a revolution.”) The picture is most disappointing when you reflect on the greatness of The Fallen Idol and The Third Man, the two previous collaborations between Greene and the director Carol Reed. But it’s just about perfectly cast, beginning with Alec Guinness as the Dickensian-named Wormold, the reluctant spy fabricating all his reports to MI6 and carrying through Noël Coward’s nearly unflappable recruiting agent, Maureen O’Hara as Wormold’s secretary and unrequited inamorata who gets one of the best and most unlikely monologues this side of Forster’s “Two Cheers for Democracy,” Ralph Richardson’s slightly befuddled intelligence chief, Paul Rogers as a stuttering assassin and Jo Morrow as Wormold’s capricious teenaged daughter, for whose whims her father undertakes the job. One good American actor (Burl Ives) is essentially miscast as a German and the role played by another (Ernie Kovacs as a military Captain known to be a butcher) is in no way as brutal or frightening as he should be. Yet, curiously, both end up earning our admiration, although Ives’ murder isn’t nearly as sad in the picture as it is in the book. Interestingly, while Fidel Castro disapproved of Greene’s mild depiction of the Baptista regime, he did allow filming to take place in his country, so the movie, while set before the revolution, gives us a rare Westerner’s glimpse of Cuba after it.

Curiously enough, in the 1990s John le Carré wrote a variation on Greene’s novel called The Tailor of Panama, and while the book was splendid the inevitable movie made from it was also disappointing.


Irene Dunne with Cary Grant. And yes, that is Asta as their dog.

The Awful Truth (1937) Leo McCarey, the director of this quintessential screwball marital comedy, famously accepted his Oscar for directing it by telling the Academy it gave him the award for the wrong picture. Yet as great, and as moving, as Make Way for Tomorrow, McCarey’s shattering evocation of what happens to Americans when they grow too old to be of easy use even to their children, is, once you’ve seen it you can barely imagine forcing yourself to sit through its final agonies ever again; whereas The Awful Truth is as clever, as delightful, and as funny, the nth time you see it as it was the first. Although Cary Grant had assayed comic roles before, it was this one, for which he initially felt miscast, that cemented him as the principal light comedian of his time. Irene Dunne is a perfect match for him, as deft and as game as he’ll ever be; she has a moment when, during a recital in which she’s performing an aria and Grant tips his chair back too far, she sings out a trilling peel of laughter I never tire of, and that never fails to make me roar. The screenwriter for this comic masterpiece was the deliciously self-named Viña Delmar (née Alvina Louise Croter), who as if to prove her versatility also wrote Make Way for Tomorrow. (Although it should be noted that much of the comic business and dialogue were improvised by McCarey and his gifted cast.)


The young cast of Super 8, complete with Panavision lens flare.

Super 8 (2011) J. J. Abrams’ paean to his adolescence, and to certain entertainments in the ‘80s quiver of his co-producer Steven Spielberg is a kind of E.T. for the post-Nixonian Alien generation. The movie has a genuine sense of wonder.


Moonstruck (1987) John Patrick Shanley’s rhapsodic romantic comedy, beautifully directed by Norman Jewison and exquisitely played by an absolutely perfect cast headed by a luminous Cher as a woman who’s given up on love, only to find it in the unlikeliest place, and with, seemingly, the least apposite of men.

Copyright 2020 by Scott Ross

Why Are Vaccine Makers Legally Immune? — Rev. E. M. Camarena’s Blog

Standard

As we see above, the New York Times has already begun the propaganda campaign AGAINST what they deride as “natural immunity.” They claim that vaccines are BETTER than having antibodies. So… What IS a vaccine? Antibodies are the key to health and immunity. The body will form them when attacked. Science has learned to TRICK […]

Why Are Vaccine Makers Legally Immune? — Rev. E. M. Camarena’s Blog