Monthly Report: February 2024

Standard

By Scott Ross

As ever, click on the highlighted links for complete reviews &cet.

Anne of the Thousand Days (1969) I was not bored watching the two hours and twenty-five minutes of this historical pageant, but half an hour after it was over I had to concentrate to remember any particular scene or performance in it. Perhaps if I gave more of a damn about the dynastic ruling families of Great Britain the story of Anne Boleyn and Henry VIII might have more resonance, but I’m less interested in the private lives of these types than I am in the damage they do to others, and to the world at large. This is especially true of “royal families,” who whatever their current disguises, believe in the absolute, divine right of monarchy: We do as we please because we are ennobled by God. In Henry’s case, this extended to deciding what the official religion of his kingdom was to be, once the previous edition stood in the way of his rutting as he liked. I will grant that, as these things go, he was right to be concerned that, without a male heir, England would likely be plunged into dynastic wars again following his death, but I have no sympathy with the Tudors or the Stuarts or their imperial Hanovarian successors and especially not their rotten descendants, the Saxe-Coburg line that laughingly anglicizes itself as Windsor and thinks the world doesn’t know they’re Germans.

The movie, produced by the venerable Hal Wallis, was based on a play by Maxwell Anderson I have neither read nor seen, but the picture is reasonably literate (the screenplay was by Bridget Boland and John Hale) and handsomely appointed in art direction (Maurice Carter), set decoration (Lionel Couch and Patrick McLoughlin) and, especially, in costume design (Margaret Furse). Still, it’s astounding to reflect that such a middling affair as Anne of the Thousand Days was in its time up for ten Academy Awards, until you discover that Universal followed its screenings for Academy members with champagne and filet mignon dinners. Too bad there wasn’t an award that year for Best Bribe. The movie does boast an impressive cast, headed by Richard Burton and Geneviève Bujold, although Burton never really convinces you he’s Henry. He would have made a good Henry V, when he was younger, but he lacks the size and dimension for Henry VIII and the script in any case lets him down, seldom hinting at the king’s dangerous irrationality as Robert Bolt did with his Henry VIII in A Man for All Seasons. Bujold, in her first important screen role, is in many ways remarkable but her Anne Boylen becomes a bit of a bore and even a pompous, demanding shrew, because that’s how she’s been written. (I’m curious as to whose bright idea it was for Anne to demand the head of Sir Thomas More, a barbarism for which there is no historical evidence.) Anthony Quayle is far more successful as Cardinal Wolsey, quietly scheming away while protesting that he’s doing no such thing. Indeed, much of the supporting cast is splendid: Irene Papas, hurt yet unyielding as Queen Catherine; John Colicos as a duplicitous Thomas Cromwell, toadying obsequiously yet plotting behind everyone’s back; Michael Hordern as Anne’s timid, avaricious father; and Peter Jeffrey as a nasty, snarling Norfolk. As More, William Squire seems to be imitating Paul Scofield, and it should be noted that, at least as far as his official portraiture is concerned, More most closely resembled neither Squire nor Scofield, but John Colicos.

The most tragic figure in the piece is poor Mark Smeaton, the royal music teacher who was one of many falsely accused of adultery with Boylen and broken by torture, particularly as played by the heartbreaking Gary Bond. His story would almost certainly have made a more involving and emotionally resonant movie than this one.


Rio Bravo (1959) Arguably the single movie directed by Howard Hawks that most neatly encapsulizes his interests as a filmmaker, and the wry humor with which he explicated them. It’s also one of the most engaging of all Hollywood movies. Hawks is one of those figures, like John Ford and Alfred Hitchcock, who while never taking a writing credit on one of his pictures was their chief animating agent, shaping every scene and even, at times, every line, in a way directors-for-hire never do. The recurrent Hawksian themes are here: Of group endeavors among professionals, anxiety over whether one is “good enough,” romance between laconic men and sharp, funny women and intense masculine friendship bordering on the homoerotic, coupled with teasing humor, periodic bursts of effective violent action and a pace that, while deliberate, seldom drags. (And speaking of the homoerotic, there’s sometimes a very good-looking boy in the Hawksian mix, such as Montgomery Clift in Red River. Here it’s Ricky Martin, unfortunately required to reprise that annoying finger-against-the-nose gesture Clift imitates Wayne doing.) It also has, in Angie Dickinson’s drily passionate “Feathers,” the most perfect example of the idealized Hawksian woman after Lauren Bacall’s Marie in To Have and Have Not. In some ways Feathers is Marie’s superior as a character in that she is warmer and her emotions are closer to the surface, which as she slyly pursues John Wayne’s John T. Chance makes her an even more appealing figure.

The 4K UHD edition burnishes Russell Harlan’s already luscious Eastmancolor images, especially the night exteriors, making it the best-looking of all of Hawks’ color pictures in a home-video format.


Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images

The Story of Vernon and Irene Castle (1939) Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers’ last RKO picture is also their most unusual: A “biopic” celebrating the first great, and most influential, ballroom dance team in America. Astaire’s approach to the dancing was so scrupulous (Vernon Castle was one of his youthful idols) that aficionados of Astaire and Rogers may be disappointed because they are dancing in character, and keeping to the style that made the Castles household names in the period between 1912 and 1918, especially their wildly popular “Castle Walk.” Astaire and Rogers were far better-looking than the Castles, and their teaming, still fresh on this, their ninth collaboration, makes their Vernon and Irene the most romantic pair imaginable. The Story of Vernon and Irene Castle is not, thankfully, a musical biography — no phony, Cole Porter-being-inspired-to-compose-“Night and Day”-by-raindrops moments here. The music is made up almost entirely of period instrumentals that accompany the Castles as they dance. There is only one original song (“Only When You’re in My Arms” by Con Conrad, Herman Ruby and Bert Kalmar), and it’s used as a diegetic source, Vernon singing the lyric as he works up the nerve to propose to Irene Foote. I’m always a little annoyed when I see the picture that the Foote’s family retainer was changed to a white man and played by Walter Brennan, although given the prevailing tendency in Hollywood to depict black men and women as “coons” for comic relief, it’s probably just as well that Walter Ash was written white.

This is the only RKO “Fred & Ginger” in which the pair portray a married couple (they’re also married in The Barkleys of Broadway, but that was 10 years later, at MGM) and while there is some tension between Vernon and Irene early on in their story, the typical screwball courting elements are, obviously, absent. Similarly, although the Castles’ eventual agent is played by the wry, eccentric Edna May Oliver and she becomes a genial confidante to the pair, she isn’t a full-blown zany like Edward Everett Horton, Eric Blore, Helen Broderick or Alice Brady in the earlier Astaire-Rogers pictures. She’s only mildly zany. (Speaking of zanies: You may recognize Leonid Kinskey as the artist in Paris whom Oliver patronizes from his appearance as the bartender Sasha in Casablanca, ardent for Madeline Lebeau.) The movie is pleasantly directed by H. C. Potter, Robert de Grasse provided rich, warm photography, and there are some striking visual effects by Vernon L. Walker, particularly the sequence where the couple dances across a map of the United States. However, the affecting grief of the scene in which Walter breaks the news of Vernon’s shocking death to Irene, and Rogers’ fine acting of it, is almost canceled out by the terrible dialogue Brennan is given to speak. Astaire is engaging, as he nearly always is, yet in some ways Vernon and Irene Castle is a showcase for Rogers, from her hilariously overblown rendition of “The Yama-Yama Man” to the moment, late in the picture, when Irene unexpectedly meets Vernon, an RAF volunteer, in a nightclub and as he embraces her she whispers, “Oh, Vernon” in a way that in its emotion and anxiety seems to anticipate her husband’s later needless death. Rogers gives a beautiful performance in what Arlene Croce in The Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers Book rightly calls “a very dear film.”

For the record, the screenplay was by Richard Sherman, Oscar Hammerstein II and Dorothy Yost. The movie is often referred to as a flop. It wasn’t — it was popular with the public — but its budget (approximately $1,196,000) meant that even its high gross ($1,825,000) did not allow it to break even.


Image via Blu-ray.com

“10” (1979) Seeing this Blake Edwards sex-comedy when it was new left me curiously dissatisfied, in a way I couldn’t quite put my finger on. Watching it again 44 years later I think I know why my nearly-19-year-old self was discomfited. The picture is bifurcated, in an odd fashion: The hilarious first half doesn’t quite line up with the more reflective second. The characters and the basic situation are the same — the successful middle-aged composer George Webber (Dudley Moore) seeks to relieve his male-menopausal sense of vague dissatisfaction by perusing an idealized woman (Bo Derek) he’s seen for a brief moment while driving — and when George flies off to Mexico after the girl, the tone is largely different… yet somehow it all feels like the same movie. I think too that at 18 I hadn’t anything like the experience of life required to empathize with Moore’s character; he seemed like a stereotype of the middle-aged letch seeking renewal in the arms of a hot young moron. Being older now than George was then, I can see both George and Jenny, Derek’s character, more clearly, and while I still think he’s crazy to risk his relationship with Julie Andrews’ warm and responsive Samantha, I no longer think Jenny is an idiot. She’s shallow, and her values are vastly different from George’s (she’s newly married, yet perfectly happy to jump in the sack with George while her young husband is recuperating in the hospital) but that doesn’t make her stupid, although her insistence on re-starting her record of the Ravel “Bolero” every time she and George are interrupted, to time it so they climax when it does, renders her exasperating. Life isn’t that canned, and certainly sex isn’t; Jenny’s single-mindedness risks turning erotic expression into nothing but an act of deliberate mechanism.

Although its parts vary they don’t cancel each other out, and “10” remains an exceptionally intelligent and entertaining comedy; the physical indignities into which George’s erotic obsessions invariably lead him are cannily conceived by the writer-director, and perfectly executed by him, with that patient, almost Classical, application of the best means of photographing comedy to the most surprising effects of physical humor. When this marriage works, as it does throughout the picture, few things are funnier. Dudley Moore, previously noted as almost purely a sketch comic,* proved a remarkable adept at this, particularly given his physical limitations (he was born with club feet and even after many childhood surgeries one leg remained both twisted and withered) and he plays the more serious second half with sensitivity and real feeling. As his song-writing partner, Robert Webber plays a gay man without the slightest acknowledgement of stereotype save his character keeping a younger man (Walter George Allen) who eventually leaves him; I can’t tell you what a relief that characterization, both as written by Edwards and as played by Webber, was when I was 18. Derek of course was half the reason the picture grossed $107 million and she’s rather good, although I found those cornrows unappealing then, and I still do, whether they’re on a white or a black head; granted I am far from the ideal judge of feminine pulchritude, I don’t enjoy seeing that much exposed scalp on anyone. Dee Wallace has a lovely role as a woman who can’t get a sexual break, Brian Dennehy a beautiful one as a sympathetic bartender, John Hancock is charming as George’s psychiatrist, and Max Showalter has one of the best scenes in the movie, as a minister with a passion for writing terrible songs. Frank Stanley provided superb cinematography, beautifully lit and photographed, especially in the movie’s many nighttime interiors which have a rich, burnished look.


Prime Cut (1972) A tough cult thriller that is almost a parody of pulp sagas, with several nasty contemporary flourishes that must make it a favorite aid to masturbation in the Tarantino household. These include the villain’s preferred method of disposing of would-be assassins, turning them into sausages in his meat-processing plant; his auctioning off drugged, naked girls like cattle; and a clever, frightening encounter by Lee Marvin and Sissy Spacek with a harvesting combiner. (That last item appears to be a nod to the crop-dusting sequence in North by Northwest.) Marvin, in a typically terse performance, plays a mob assassin whose objective is the murder of the cheerfully venal meat-packager “Mary Ann” (Gene Hackman) making Prime Cut the sort of picture in which the hero you root for is a hired killer and which tells you something about how appalling Hackman’s character is. Spacek, in her first credited role, is one of the young sex-slaves, rescued on an outraged whim by Marvin, and she has a remarkable, slightly dazed, mien. Previously an orphan, she doesn’t seem to have any experience of the world that might give her a sense of what is appropriate, as when Marvin buys her a whole new trousseau and she comes down to dinner in their three-star hotel wearing no brassiere. Hackman, coming off The French Connection, plays Mary Ann with a genial coldness that does little to mask his psychopathy, and as his bizarre, dangerous brother “Weenie,” Gregory Walcott is a genuinely unsettling presence, a rich weirdo who lives in a cheap flop-house with flimsy partitions rather than actual rooms. Some have said the odd relationship between the brothers suggests a homosexual liaison, but the behavior of the characters is so bizarre almost any interpretation would do.

Robert Dillon wrote the pitch-black seriocomic script (he was, with his wife, later credited with the story for the underrated French Connection II) and Michael Ritchie directed efficiently. Gene Polito’s widescreen cinematography has exceptional richness, with Calgary exteriors subbing for Kansas City and environs. The atmospheric score is by Lalo Schifrin.


You can’t tell it from this still, but Wayne and Hepburn have a great time together in the movie.

Rooster Cogburn (1975) A wholly unnecessary sequel to True Grit done for what I assume were entirely mercenary reasons and with maximal borrowings from elsewhere but which has many compensations, not least of which is the once-surprising teaming of John Wayne and Katharine Hepburn.


El Dorado (1966) Leigh Brackett claimed of her screen adaptation of the Harry Brown novel The Stars in Their Courses, placing The Iliad in the old West, that it was the best script she ever wrote. Coming from the woman who also wrote Hatari! and who co-authored The Big Sleep, Rio Bravo, Rio Lobo and The Empire Strikes Back, those are words to conjure with. Unfortunately, the tragic nature of the material made Howard Hawks nervous, which I suspect was largely due to his having had two flops in a row and needing a more sure thing. Hence El Dorado, a loose demi-remake of Rio Bravo. The repetition disturbed Brackett: “The more we got into doing Rio Bravo over again,” she noted later, “the sicker I got, because I hate doing things over again. And I kept saying to Howard I did that, and he’d say it was okay, we could do it over again.” Hawks’ lack of compunction about repeating himself is one of his most dismaying flaws as a filmmaker, along with his blindness to the recurring homoeroticism between his male characters and his rich-boy’s indifference to spending other people’s money, which often resulted in his best pictures making less at the box-office than they should have because their negative cost was so great.

If you take in El Dorado without undue expectations you’ll likely find it an engaging, somewhat enervated, comic Western enlivened by its trio of central actors. John Wayne as a gun-for-hire with a conscience does little he hasn’t done before, but as usual with him, it’s the way he does it that registers. Wayne had been in pictures long enough that he knew how little he had to do, how small his gestures needed to be, to make an impact and the pauses he takes between words are always surprising, even if (as one suspects) he often did so because he was groping for the next part of a line. Other actors point at an object; Wayne stabs the air slowly and snaps his hand back in a single, flowing gesture and you’re never in doubt of the importance of what he’s saying, or less than delighted by the economy with which he says it. Robert Mitchum essentially plays the same drunken sheriff role Dean Martin assayed in Rio Bravo, and while I’ve always liked Martin in that picture, Mitchum shows you how much more effecting the part might have been with a real screen actor playing it. When, after enduring the crude insults of the heavies he returns to the jail with a bottle of whiskey, the tears in Mitchum’s eyes as he tells Wayne, “They laughed at me,” and the disbelieving hurt in his voice, make all the difference between a good moment and a great one. As the untested but enthusiastic tryo, the young James Caan brings a welcome freshness to a role that is largely a re-tread of Ricky Nelson’s in Rio Bravo. (He’s even called “Mississippi,” the way Nelson was nicknamed “Colorado.”) Caan is such a pleasant addition he almost gets you past the movie’s worst, and ugliest, moment: When against all likelihood he gets away with a patently phony disguise by pretending to be a gibbering Chinese. This “comic” bit would have fallen flat in 1930; for 1967 it’s practically obscene.

While Arthur Hunnicutt is not as memorable as Walter Brennan in the role that echoes Brennan’s he’s quite amiable, as is Paul Fix as a sympathetic physician and Christopher George as Wayne’s knife-scarred rival. Ed Asner makes a quietly hissable villain, Charlene Holt is very fine in an abbreviated version of “the Hawksian woman,” Johnny Crawford is effecting as a dying boy whose fate, for which he is unavoidably responsible, shakes Wayne’s character to the core and Michele Carey is as sexy a tomboy as you’ll ever see. Nelson Riddle’s music, while not a patch on Dmitri Tiomkin’s for El Dorado‘s predecessor, and much more modern-sounding, is full of good things and may make you wish he’d been offered more movies to score, or in any case had been less busy arranging for Sinatra and Ella Fitzgerald and thus able to accept more such offers. El Dorado was shot in Utah and at the Old Tucson Studios in Arizona by the veteran cinematographer Harold Rosson whose Technicolor imagery is mouth-watering, especially in his night sequences and the glorious purple sunset farewell between Wayne and Holt.


The Journey of Natty Gann (1985) An amiable period road-movie from the era in which Disney was attempting to attract a more adult audience with items like The Black Hole, Never Cry Wolf, and the misbegotten Something Wicked This Way Comes. There is actually little to shield a child from here aside from a few relatively mild oaths (“shit” is the most frequent curse) and one brief, unsettling scene in which the heroine is menaced by a man who gives her a ride in his pickup, predictably foiled by an attack from her pet wolf. That sentence is less risible than it sounds since Natty (Meredith Salenger) frees the wolf from a dog-fighting ring early on and it attaches itself to her as a consequence. It’s a Depression story, in which a widowed father (the excellent Ray Wise) reluctantly leaves his daughter in the care of a Chicago hotlier (Lainie Kazan) when work on the West Coast presents itself. As the girl’s life there becomes more and more insupportable she takes off to follow her father, encountering railroad-riders, a gang of young hoods, an orphanage out of Little Orphan Annie and other travails. The outcome is never really in doubt, although the screenwriter (Jeanne Rosenberg) places obstacles in the paths of both father and daughter that occasionally cause you to wonder, or to try second-guessing. (I was convinced that someone, human or animal, was going to die before the end.) With its indomitable tomboy heroine, it’s a picture young girls ought to love, but that boys would also respond to, especially with that wonderful Canis lupus companion played by Jed, the wolf-Malamute mix who later starred in the 1991 Disney adaptation of Jack London’s White Fang.

James Horner’s score, as was the case so often with him, is so imitative I thought at first I was hearing the work of Georges Delerue, whose music for Something Wicked was tossed out the year before and replaced by a lesser but effective one by Horner. (I had forgotten that Natty Gann‘s original composer, Elmer Bernstein, was, like Delerue, replaced, and some of the music I was hearing and attributing to Horner ripping Bernstein off, was actually his.)† As Natty, Meredith Salenger makes a most appealing champion, personable but determined, and despite her youth, nobody’s fool. Her androgyny and her masculine attire also help her blend in with such wild boys of the road as John Cusack, playing a young homeless man Natty befriends. Cusack is an asset as are, in smaller roles, Scatman Crothers, Barry Miller, Zachary Ainsley, Verna Bloom, John Finnegan, Bruce M. Fischer, Hannah Cutrona and Sheelah Megill. The director, Jeremy Kagan, who had previously made the enormously likeable 1970s private-detective variation The Big Fix, has a nice eye for detail and a fine sense of pace, but the most impressive aspect of The Journey of Natty Gann is its sumptuous photography by Dick Bush. The picture was shot in Vancouver, and the vivid images Bush captured of its lush, verdant wildernesses pop off the screen.


The War Wagon (1967) An enjoyable Western comedy, directed with flair and a quickened pace by the veteran Burt Kennedy and based by Clair Huffaker, who also wrote The Comancheros and 100 Rifles, on his novel Badman. That word is interesting, in that John Wayne plays an ex-con conniving to get his hands on a cache of gold that should have been his. Granted he was innocent and railroaded into prison by the venal mining boss played by Bruce Cabot in a successful attempt to legally steal what belonged to Taw Jackson, Wayne’s character. But if there are Wayne roles, aside from the Ringo Kid in the John Ford Stagecoach and one of the 3 Godfathers, also for Ford, in which he played even an alleged criminal, I’m not aware of them. Not that this is a serious matter; The War Wagon is an escapade, and a largely merry one. Wayne’s antagonist and reluctant partner in his revenge against Cabot is Kirk Douglas, a happy heterosexual but because the actor chose to wear a large ring over one gloved finger, one that made Wayne predictably nervous. (John Wayne was nauseated that Douglas chose to play Van Gogh, so one can well imagine his reaction to that ring.) Along for the ride are a cheerfully cynical Howard Keel as a thoroughly Anglicized Indian, Robert Walker Jr. as a young explosives expert with a drinking problem, Keenan Wynn as a despicable petty thief, Valora Noland as his resigned child-bride, Joanna Barnes as one of Douglas’ playmates, Gene Evans as an excitable deputy sheriff, Marco Antonio as a belligerent chief and, in smaller roles, Bruce Dern and Sheb Wooley. The splendid William H. Clothier provided the excellent widescreen cinematography, and Dimitri Tiomkin’s score, which pretends to take the whole business seriously, is a peach, with a title song whose wonderfully silly Ned Washington lyrics are performed with brio by that other notable Caucasian Indian of the 1960s, Ed Ames.

in any of his other pictures. Not that this is a serious matter; The War Wagon is an escapade, and a largely merry one. Wayne’s antagonist and reluctant partner in his revenge against Cabot is Kirk Douglas, a happy heterosexual but because the actor chose to wear a large ring over one gloved finger, one that made Wayne predictably nervous. (John Wayne was nauseated that Douglas chose to play Van Gogh, so one can well imagine his reaction to that ring.) Along for the ride are a cheerfully cynical Howard Keel as a thoroughly Anglicized Indian, Robert Walker Jr. as a young explosives expert with a drinking problem, Keenan Wynn as a despicable petty thief, Valora Noland as his resigned child-bride, Joanna Barnes as one of Douglas’ playmates, Gene Evans as an excitable deputy sheriff, Marco Antonio as a belligerent chief and, in smaller roles, Bruce Dern and Sheb Wooley. The splendid William H. Clothier provided the excellent widescreen cinematography, and Dimitri Tiomkin’s score, which pretends to take the whole business seriously, is a peach, with a title song whose wonderfully silly Ned Washington lyrics are performed with brio by that other notable Caucasian Indian of the 1960s, Ed Ames.


*With his comedy partner, Peter Cook. Both were alumni, alongside Jonathan Miller and the brilliant future playwright Alan Bennett (and, later, when Miller left, Paxton Whitehead) of the Beyond the Fringe stage show. Cook and Moore also wrote and starred in the amusing, if ultimately labored, Faust variation Bedazzled, cobbled up dozens of brilliant sketches and, in occasionally inebriated ad-lib sessions, recorded the genuinely foul, obscene, and frequently hilarious “Derek and Clive” albums.

†Bernstein’s music for Natty Gann was later part of a boxed set released by Varèse Sarabande and that also included his rejected scores for Gangs of New York and The Scarlet Letter. Parlor game: Name a single movie that was substantially improved by its desperate producers throwing out one score and replacing it with another. This is what people do when they don’t know what else to do.

Text copyright 2024 by Scott Ross

Bloody likely: “Pygmalion” (1938)

Standard

By Scott Ross

Few pictures of its period provide the refreshment, intellectual and otherwise, that this marvelous edition of Bernard Shaw’s comedy of ideas does. Directed largely by Anthony Asquith with the un-credited assistance of his editor David Lean (the movie’s star Leslie Howard got the credit, but reportedly did little to merit it) it’s a swift, delicious example of how a great play can occasionally be made into a great movie. Shaw, who also received more credit on the picture than he probably deserved — he even got an Academy Award — was reportedly delighted with it; why not, since it retained all his best dialogue and even managed, somehow, to sneak the dread phrase “Not bloody likely” past the censors.*

Interestingly, the additions (by, among others, Ian Dalrymple, Anatole de Grunwald, Kay Walsh and even the producer, Gabriel Pascal) were largely replicated by Alan Jay Lerner when he adapted Pygmalion as My Fair Lady; that includes the ending, which Lean claimed was his, although Shaw himself was prevailed upon to create the Embassy ball sequence, which had then to be edited down from the 45 pages(!) he turned in for it.† Allegedly, his conception of the duplicitous linguist Aristid Karparthy (unseen in the play, where he is called Nepommuck) was a spoof of the Hungarian Pascal, although the producer didn’t seem to notice.

Howard, whom Shaw objected to, seems to me just about the perfect Henry Higgins, and his accelerated delivery of those witty, complex lines is sometimes breathtaking. Although I wish Wendy Hiller had been a prettier Eliza — the limitations of her looks, and of her upper body generally, are especially evident in the ball sequence, where she seems ill at ease and physically unappealing — it’s hard to see how her performance could otherwise have been improved upon. She hits every note exactly right (her playing of the tea party scene is inspired) and when she weeps, she wounds you.‡

The splendid supporting cast includes Wilfrid Lawson as the very embodiment of Alfred Doolittle; Marie Lohr, warm and inviting as Higgins’ mother; Scott Sunderland as a notably gentle Colonel Pickering; Jean Cadell, charming Scots burr to the fore as an astringent yet kindly Mrs. Pearce; David Tree, a quintessential upper-class twit as Freddy; and Esme Percy’s Karparthy “oozing charm from every pore” as he calculates the riches to be gotten from blackmailing. I may have spotted Cathleen Nesbitt among the supernumeraries although not Patrick Macnee, who is also supposed to be there. But you can’t miss Anthony Quayle in a brief bit as a French hairdresser.

My only real criticisms about the picture are minor, the first perhaps something only another dramatist would spot: That the substitution of the foreshortened “bus” in Higgins’ original line of 1912, “You talk about me as if I were a motorbus” (and Eliza’s return, “So you are a motorbus: all bounce and go and no consideration for anyone”) ruins the rhetorical flow of the sentences — almost violently, as if the bus had hit a wall. Worse, however, Eliza’s reaction to seeing Dolittle shaved and in his wedding-day attire, and Higgins’ almost hysterical taunting of her for it, are unlikely, unnecessary, and mean. They make her look a fool in a scene in which she is anything but, and him hideously neotenous, like an especially obnoxious schoolyard bully in tweed. Higgins is petulant, yes. He’s also blind, insensitive and, occasionally, idiotically self-pitying. But he’s seldom petty, and never ridiculous.

Those small cavils aside, Harry Stradling Sr.’s cinematography still looks luminous after more than 80 years and the whole thing has the happy air of a lot of bright, competent people doing their best to bring a sparkling entertainment safely and gloriously into port.


*When Alan Jay Lerner adapted Pygmalion into My Fair Lady, he had to come up with something as shocking to a 1956 American musical theatre audience as that once curiously proscribed “obscenity” was to the British public in 1912. Hence, at Ascot, Eliza’s “Come on, Dover — move yer bloomin’ arse!”

†It’s also from the movie of Pygmalion that Alan Lerner cribbed Higgins’ elocution lessons (“The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain” and “In Hertford, Hereford, and Hampshire, hurricanes hardly ever happen”) and indeed the very idea for his first act montage of Higgins drilling the hapless Eliza in phonetics.

‡Shaw wanted Charles Laughton for Higgins rather than Howard, and while Laughton would certainly have been splendidly funny, with those two faces filling the screen I don’t see how romance could have been possible… although Shaw did not want that either.

Text copyright 2020 by Scott Ross

Quarterly Report: July — September 2019

Standard

By Scott Ross

Home-viewing from The Armchair Theatre over the last three months; because there isn’t a single bloody thing in the cinemas worth the time, petrol, cash or personal energy it would take to go out. Although I will admit I was convinced by a friend to attend a special screening of Daughters of the Dust… thereby proving the point.


Tootsie Jessica Lang and Dustin Hoffman
Tootsie (1982) Take one vanity project for a notoriously self-involved actor (Murray Schisgal writing a screenplay about acting for Dustin Hoffman); mix with a separate script by Don McGuire concerning an out-of-work performer donning drag for a soap-opera role that borrows a bit too liberally from Some Like it Hot, even unto its blond object of affection and unwanted middle-aged suitors; add in re-writes by a small army of scenarists headed by the great Larry Gelbart and including, un-credited, Barry Levinson, Robert Garland and Elaine May; bake by a director widely known as one of Hollywood’s most notorious writer fuckers (Gelbart claimed the movie was stitched together from any number of scenarists’ drafts), and the result should have been a disaster. Instead, through some weird alchemy it not only wasn’t but somehow those ingredients contrived to blend so well the picture became a small classic of its kind. Revisiting Tootsie from a 35-year remove, it seems almost miraculous: A popular comedy that tickles the mind as often as it does the ribs. And the direction, by Sydney Pollack, never a favorite filmmaker of this writer, looks as good now as it did in 1982; whatever its internal flaws (including a series of consecutive events supposedly encompassing a single evening that Gelbart later wrote was “a night that would have to last a hundred hours”) the picture is strikingly lovely, with Owen Roizman’s sumptuous lighting and the crisp, witty editing by Fredric Steinkamp and William Steinkamp giving it a patina of warmth and sophistication, a rare combination for any movie comedy.

Hoffman’s “Dorothy Michaels” ranks as one of the great comic creations in American movies, yet the actor also locates the loneliness of the character — or, rather characters, since everything Dorothy says and does is filtered through Michael Dorsey’s brain and emotions — and an essential sweetness and decency Michael himself lacks when he’s wearing pants.* As the unwitting object of Michael’s interests, Jessica Lange was a revelation in 1982, lightness and gravity in balance, and what she does is still astonishing in the sheer rightness of her every glance, inflection and wistful hesitation. Terri Garr is no less entrancing, in what is surely her best screen performance, and Bill Murray gets the picture’s best lines as Michael’s playwright roommate. (May created the character, and wrote his speeches.) Against his own wishes, Pollack took on the role of Hoffman’s agent, and their scenes together, reflecting some of the very real anger and frustration each felt toward the other, are among the movie’s comic highlights. The wonderful supporting cast includes Dabney Coleman as the sexist television director, Charles Durning and George Gaynes in the Joe E. Brown role(s), Doris Belack as the savvy “daytime drama” producer, Geena Davis as a nurse in the soap-within-a-film’s fictional hospital, and the late Lynne Thigpen as the show’s floor manager. Dave Grusin, who often floundered when composing for dramatic pictures, wrote for Tootsie one of his most felicitous comedy scores. It isn’t funny in itself, nor does it try to be; its alternate airs of peppy urbanity and plangent emotionalism make for a perfect juxtaposition that reflects the plot’s development and moods without attempting either to compete with them, or to ape the action.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
* Hoffman based Dorothy’s soft Southern vocal mannerisms on those of his friend Polly Holiday.


They Might Be Giants - finale

George C. Scott and Joanne Woodward in the movie’s radiant, moving final moments.

They Might Be Giants (1971) James Goldman has long been one of my favorite writers. While nowhere near as prolific (nor as well known) as his brother William, his smaller output includes the 1965 play and subsequent movie 1968 The Lion in Winter (for which he won an Academy Award); the beautifully compressed book for the landmark Stephen Sondheim/Harold Prince Follies, arguably the single greatest theatrical musical of the 20th century; the wonderfully conceived and unexpectedly moving Robin and Marian (1976); a superb novel about King John, Myself as Witness, in which Goldman re-examined an historical figure he felt he had maligned in his previous writing; and the play on which this lovely picture was based and for which he wrote the perfectly structured adaptation. Hal Prince produced the play’s only major production in London, later castigating himself for hiring the wrong director (Joan Littlewood) for the piece, although Goldman himself said he was unhappy with the script, which he subsequently withdrew from further production. The movie, while disappointing financially — presumably those involved expected another Lion in Winter — is a blissful variation on Arthur Conan Doyle, in which a mad retired jurist (George C. Scott) called Justin Playfair, who believes he is Sherlock Holmes, is examined by a psychiatrist (Joanne Woodward) named Mildred Watson. They meet as antagonists, form an uneasy alliance and drift toward romance, while Playfair seeks a rendezvous with the elusive Professor Moriarty. It may sound twee, and there are many on whom its gentle charms are no doubt lost, but it’s a funny, and surprisingly emotional, rumination on the relative insanity of a brilliant, harmless paranoid and of the increasingly mad society to which he is expected to conform. That last notion no doubt seems trite, but it has seldom been handled with such deftness and wit. Anthony Harvey, who also directed The Lion in Winter, shot the picture with a nervy energy that captures the New York City of the early 1970s, not as if under glass but as a living stage for Playfair’s intrigues.

Scott and Woodward tear into their roles with the relish of great actors who know in their bones they’ve got their hands on some of the choicest dialogue around, and the rich supporting cast includes Jack Gilford, Al Lewis, Rue McClanahan, Theresa Merritt, Eugene Roche, James Tolkan, Kitty Winn, Sudie Bond, Staats Cotsworth, F. Murray Abraham, Paul Benedict, M. Emmet Walsh and Louis Zorich. There’s also a brief but extremely effective chamber score by John Barry, arranged and augmented by Ken Thorne. Two home-video versions exist: One (a Universal Vault DVD) running under 90 minutes, reflects the theatrical release while the other, the television edit (on Blu-Ray from Kino Lorber) is longer, and includes the wry, delightful extended sequence in an immense Manhattan grocery store. It could, I suppose, be argued that the story doesn’t need the grocery sequence, and the climax plays well without it. But it also seems to me that the movie is enriched by its inclusion, and diminished by its excision. So, caveat emptor.

Dr. Mildred Watson: You’re just like Don Quixote. You think that everything is always something else.

Justin Playfair: Well, he had a point. ‘Course, he carried it a bit too far. He thought that every windmill was a giant. That’s insane. But, thinking that they might be, well… All the best minds used to think the world was flat. But what if it isn’t? It might be round. And bread mold might be medicine. If we never looked at things and thought of what might be, why we’d all still be out there in the tall grass with the apes.


Daughters of the Dust_Trailer

Cora Lee Day as Nana Peazant

Daughters of the Dust (1991) Julie Dash’s dreamlike evocation of Gulla society on a small South Carolina island in the early years of the 20th century was well-received critically but not a box-office success. 20/20 hindsight by knee-jerk commentators now has it that the picture was badly handled by its distributor because its writer-director was not only a woman, but a black woman. Yet I don’t see how this luminously photographed exercise in non-linear rumination could have been a popular success in any era: It’s so diffuse it seems less Impressionistic than merely undefined; we can scarcely tell what the various narrative threads are, much less what they mean. What’s best about the picture, aside from Arthur Jafa’s exquisite cinematography, are the wonderful faces of the expressive actors, especially those of Cora Lee Day as the family matriarch clinging to her African roots and religion, Cheryl Lynn Bruce as her overly-devout Christian granddaughter, and Barbara-O as her mirror opposite, a wayward young woman who left the island for a man but who now is involved with a younger woman. But 60 minutes into this hour-and-52-minute glorified student film my eyes had long since begun to glaze over and even those interesting faces weren’t enough to clear them.


The Last Hard Men - Heston and Coburn

The Last Hard Men (1976) A tough, bloody Western from an unsparing Brian Garfield novel, starring Charlton Heston and James Coburn as old antagonists on a collision course. Although (unlike in the book’s ending) the movie’s climax seemingly leaves his character’s survival in doubt, and while the actor was too young for the role — as Garfield wrote it, the former lawman is in his 60s, and becoming increasingly frail — Heston is quite a good match for the ruthless Coburn, and the filmmakers (Andrew V. McLaglen was the director, and Guerdon Trueblood wrote the script) don’t flinch from the story’s most horrific moment, when the Heston figure’s daughter (Barbara Hershey) is gang-raped by Coburn’s team of escaped prisoners. The role of Hershey’s earnest suitor is the sort of part the young Jeff Bridges could have turned into a third lead by doing almost nothing, and while Chris Mitchum is attractive, he’s completely out of his depth; as an actor he was never much more than the pretty son of a movie star. While the performance of Michael Parks, as the sheriff who accompanies Heston on part of the quest to retrieve his daughter, suffers from his role being less interesting than in the Garfield book, the actors playing Coburn’s gang (Jorge Rivero, Thalmus Rasulala, Morgan Paull, Robert Donner, Riley Hill and especially Larry Wilcox and John Quade) are an impressively frightening bunch and Duke Callaghan’s widescreen cinematography is lustrous. Leonard Rosenman composed a terse, uncompromising score (it was later made available on CD) which was then replaced by a collection of newly-recorded cues from several of Jerry Goldsmith’s  previous 20th Century-Fox titles 100 Rifles (1969), Rio Conchos (1964), Morituri (1965) and the 1966 Stagecoach. I assume this was due to their being more traditional action cues and Western pieces than Rosenman’s dark, brooding compositions. But while they are splendid in themselves, if you’re already familiar with them from their sources they’re a needless distraction.


Invisible Monster titcd

The great title card for one of “Jonny Quest”‘s creepiest episodes. If only the animation for the show had been this good!

“Johnny Quest: The Complete Original Series (1964 – 1965) When I was a child the Saturday morning re-airings of this 1964 one-shot, an impressive attempt by Joseph Barbera and William Hanna to create and direct a weekly prime-time animated adventure series,‡ made an enormous impression. It was the first “serious” animation I’d ever seen, its often eerie plot-lines were, for a 5-year old, fascinatingly scary… and in the titular figure, the irrepressible blond-topped All-American Jonny, lay my first big crush.† The gifted comics artist Doug Wildey designed the show and its central cast: Plucky Jonny, his slightly mystical adopted Indian brother Hadji, father Benton Quest and bodyguard Race Bannon (who, white hair aside, was, somewhat confusingly for me, almost a dead-ringer for my own father). Produced in the so-called “limited” format pioneered by Hanna-Barbera, and which Chuck Jones astutely referred to as “illustrated radio,” the series, re-viewed from an adult perspective, contains highly variable animation; there are times when the characters are beautifully drawn, while at others they are remarkably poorly drafted, and this older viewer could certainly do with less of Jonny’s annoying little dog Bandit. But the stories are nearly always, despite a 26-minute limitation, well-plotted and exciting, often with an agreeable avoidance of earthly explanation for seemingly supernatural phenomenon. Children, like many of their adult counterparts, love to be frightened, and they especially love ghost stories and impossible monsters; it was a consistent reliance on rationality than killed my initial enthusiasm for the later H-B “Scooby Doo, Where Are You?”

Among the pleasures of the series were, and are, the voices, especially the appealing Tim Matheson as Jonny, the undemonstrably masculine Mike Road as Race, the charming Danny Bravo — who seems to have based his vocal characterization on Sabu — as Hadji, Vic Perrin as the show’s recurring villain Dr. Zinn and occasional guest artists such as Keye Luke, Jesse White, J. Pat O’Malley and even, astonishingly, Everett Sloan as an unrepentant old Nazi. Hoyt Curtin’s superb main title theme, with its bracing mix of big band and James Bond, is another asset; most of the incidental music is his, with additional and uncredited compositions by Ted Nichols. Many of the series’ best (and creepiest) episodes were written by William Hamilton: “The Robot Spy,” “Dragons of Ashida,” “Turu the Terrible,” “Werewolf of the Timberland” and “The Invisible Monster.” Among the others of especial note are “The Curse of Anubis” (Walter Black), “Calcutta Adventure” (Joanna Lee), and “Shadow of the Condor” and “The House of Seven Gargoyles” (both by Charles Hoffman). The recent Warner Archives Blu-Ray collection, while it contains few extras, looks terrific.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
† Like “Top Cat” and “The Jestsons,” “Jonny Quest” lasted only a single prime-time season. But when you’re a child, you’re not counting episodes, and due to repeated Saturday morning re-airings all three shows seemed to run forever.

‡How typical of me that my first big crush would be not another boy but a cartoon character… Still, I don’t know whether it was so much that I was attracted to Jonny as that I longed to be him. And isn’t hero-worship often what early same-sex crushes amount to?


Klute - Fonda and Sutherland (Klute comforts Bree)

Klute (1971) The truly chilling paranoia thriller starring Donald Sutherland and Jane Fonda, who as the call-girl Bree Daniels gives what I consider the finest performance by an American movie actor of the last 50 years.


In the Heat of the Night - Sidney Poitier, Jester Hairston and Rod Steiger

Rod Steiger, Jester Hairston and Sidney Poitier

In the Heat of the Night (1967) This tense, unblinking police procedural coated in a patina of social critique was one of the great successes of its year, which also saw the premier of Bonnie and Clyde. And while the picture is very much of its time in its examination of racist bigotry in the then-current American Deep South, it’s also a brisk, exciting detective thriller that holds up remarkably well, not least due to the crisp direction by Norman Jewison and to the picture’s precise Stirling Silliphant screenplay. Indeed, I prefer Silliphant’s creative adaptation to John Ball’s original novel, in which race is an important component, yet is less central to the narrative’s tensions than in the much bolder, angrier, movie, especially via the incendiary central relationship between Sidney Poitier’s Virgil Tibbs and Rod Steiger’s Chief Gilliespie. It should be remembered that the picture was in release only three years after the murders of Goodman, Chaney and Schwerner, and the sense of dangerous rot and slowly simmering violence Jewison captures onscreen is as palpable as the oppressive, humid heat of its Mississippi setting. (Although most of it was  shot in the southern Illinois town of Sparta.) Poitier gives a performance of wit, implacable inner strength and fierce integrity. There are a number of moments in the picture where what we see in a character’s face is more revealing, and quietly powerful, than what is said. Poitier has one such scene, when Steiger dismisses him, and his assistance in the murder investigation. Perhaps the most difficult thing an actor can do is to allow us to see him thinking. Too many actors project thought in those moments, and it’s nearly always phony. With Poitier, the impact registers itself in, first, his disbelief, followed by his fury, and, finally, a soft, subtle smile. He gets it; he’s been here before. Yet none of what we see is obvious, or overdone.

Lee Grant, as the widow of the murder victim, has a similar scene where, shocked into silence by the news of her husband’s death, she reacts against Poitier’s gentle attempt to seat her with an anguished, rigid gesture that slowly turns to acceptance and, more potently, the need to be comforted. It’s devastating to watch. As the racist sheriff, Steiger, at the height of his screen prowess, meets his co-star blow-for-blow. Gillespie is as much an outsider in the town as Virgil, and as distrusted by the locals. His tension is coiled deep, and he expresses that inner explosiveness in the way he compulsively chews gum, stopping only when he has something to say, or when comprehension breaks through his consciousness. The supporting roles are so perfectly cast they seem inevitable — absolutely real: Warren Oates as a patrolman with a secret; Larry Gates as  a smooth and powerful old racist; the usually genial William Schallert as the bigoted mayor; Beah Richards as the local abortionist; Quentin Dean as a white-trash slut; Anthony James as a smirking creep; Scott Wilson as a prime suspect in the killing, whose changing relationship to Virgil is far warmer than what transpires between Tibbs and Gillespie; and Jester Hairston as an Uncle Tom butler outraged by Tibbs slapping his employer. (If you look sharp, you’ll also see Harry Dean Stanton as a cop.) That slap was a blow for liberty, and must have resounded sharply in many places across the globe, not merely the Southern United States. The dark, expressive cinematography is by Haskell Wexler — cheated by the constricted budget of a crane, he and Jewison make frequent, and often very effective, use of zoom lenses. Hal Ashby provided the fluid editing, and Quincy Jones’ score, mixing jazz and blues, has a nervous, funky energy perfectly in keeping with the movie’s sense of dark foreboding, and he composed a terrific main title song (with lyrics by Marilyn and Alan Bergman) that’s sung with passionate soul by Ray Charles. Jones’ cue for Wilson’s attempted escape (and suggested by Jewison) is a highlight, puttering out expressively as the murder suspect realizes he’s licked — the musical equivalent of a runner who’s out of breath.


Ghostbusters1984_45

Ghostbusters (1984) Horror comedy was far from a new concept when Ghostbusters was made — Harold Lloyd starred in something rather redundantly called Haunted Spooks in 1920 — but until 1981 and An American Werewolf in London there had never been one with elaborate special-effects, and even that was modestly budgeted; Ghostbusters cost six times as much (its budget was between $25 and 30 million.) Most of its predecessors tend to be either comedies with a few ghostly appurtenances (cf., Bob Hope’s The Ghost Breakers, Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein, Young Frankenstein and Don Knotts’ The Ghost and Mr. Chicken) or genuine horror with black comedy overtones (The Abominable Dr. Phibes, Theatre of Blood, Phantom of the Paradise and, indeed, American Werewolf in London) but Ghostbusters takes nothing seriously. Its writer/stars, Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis, see everything as funny, and since The Ghostbusters themselves seldom panic, we spend the entire movie in a state of amused relaxation right along with them; the audience takes its cue from laid-back smart-ass Bill Murray’s Peter Venkman, for whom the entire natural world is a sardonic joke, so why should the supernatural world be any different? Murray’s comic persona is so relaxed he’s like a more sarcastic version of Bing Crosby.

The picture is inconsequential — you smile through most of it, even if you seldom laugh out loud — yet at the same time memorable; several of its set-pieces, phrases and gags became instant cultural touchstones, and after seeing the movie you’ll likely never look at a bag of marshmallows the same way. Sigourney Weaver has a good, serio-comic role as the woman whose apartment is being taken over by an ancient deity, Rick Moranis is sweetly oblivious as a dweeby neighbor, Annie Potts is the Ghostbusters’ preternaturally un-fazable secretary, William Atherton is an officious prick from the EPA (why do so many satires go after EPA rather than corporate polluters?) and Ernie Hudson gets a largely thankless role as the token black member of the team. László Kovács shot the movie beautifully, and the veteran Elmer Bernstein composed a score that, anchored to a loping main theme, was almost too effective: Despite his having composed in his long career everything from epics (The Ten Commandments) and Westerns (The Magnificent Seven) to thrillers (The Great Escape) and intimate dramas (To Kill a Mockingbird) and in every conceivable format from symphonic to jazz, the success of Airplane!, The Blues Brothers, An American Werewolf, Trading Places and Ghostbusters got him typecast for years as purely a comedy composer.


Touch-of-Evil-7-e1382097512115-940x460

Touch of Evil (1958) Orson Welles‘ minor masterpiece, and the last time he was permitted the luxury of the studio system’s largess.


the_pink_panther_blake_edwards_and_peter_sellers_on_the_set_of_the_return_of_the_pink_panther

The Pink Panther (1963)
A Shot in the Dark (1964)
The Return of the Pink Panther (1975)

The Pink Panther Strikes Again (1976)
Revenge of the Pink Panther (1978)
The Trail of the Pink Panther (1982)

How Blake Edwards took his love for silent comedy routines deep into the post-War pop consciousness.


Chinatown_091pyxurz1

Chinatown (1974) The modern classic by Robert Towne and Roman Polanski.


Beetlejuice

Beetlejuice (1988) I misunderstood Beetlejuice when it was new; my contemporary review (fortunately now lost to the landfills) betrayed a certain — and to me, now, inexplicable — inability to keep pace with Tim Burton’s patented blend of amiability and dark comic outrage. It wasn’t that I couldn’t appreciate his often exhilarating blend of comedy and horror; the Large Marge sequence in Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure made me laugh so hard I nearly fell out of my seat. But I somehow wasn’t ready for an entire feature with that sensibility, unfettered. Revisiting Beetlejuice now, as I feel compelled to do every few years, I can’t help wondering why my younger self couldn’t relax enough to embrace such a cheerfully anarchic comedy as this one. Written by Michael McDowell (sadly, one of all too many creative men who succumbed to AIDS) and Warren Skaaren (also now prematurely dead, of bone cancer) from a story by McDowell and Larry Wilson, it’s a spook-fest for jaded children, a supernatural comedy that stints neither on the humor nor the paranormal.

As the nice young Connecticut couple who discover they’re dead and doomed to live with the wacko modern artist and her bourgeois real-estate developer husband they can’t scare away, Alec Baldwin and Geena Davis embody the spirit of the whole enterprise; they’re too sweetly gentle to make decent ghosts. As the titular “bio-exorcist,” Michael Keaton was a revelation, and his performance still amazes; nothing he’d done in movies up to that point had prepared us for the primal forces he unleashed in himself as Beetlejuice. His non-stop patter, loopy asides, gross-out wit and sheer brazen crudity were like nothing we’d seen in a movie comedy before. I think you’d have to imagine how movie audiences reacted the first time they saw the Marx Brothers to understand the impact that performance had on us in 1988. The strong supporting cast includes a very young Winona Ryder as the developer’s slightly off, death-obsessed teenage daughter; the peerlessly self-satisfied Jeffrey Jones as her father; the ever-treasurable Catherine O’Hara as his nasty, pretentious wife; Sylvia Sidney, in her of her final performances, as Baldwin and Davis’ case-worker, making the most of a role that is really little more than a delicious sick joke; Glenn Shadix as an obnoxious interior designer§; and Dick Cavett as a blasé society snob. Danny Elfman composed one of his brightest early scores, which deftly incorporates some of Harry Belafonte’s calypso hits. The first time I saw Beetlejuice, the use of “Day-O” offended me; now that sequence strikes me as one of the happiest in the picture. That’s one of the perks of revisiting old movies: Realizing that it wasn’t the original, uncategorizable, picture that was to blame for your dismissal of it, and being happy that you’ve lived to become a person who can surrender himself to it.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
§ Although Shadix’s performance struck me at the time as an exercise in extreme stereotype, the actor was himself gay.


The Seven-Per-Cent Solution - Duvall, Arkin, Williamson watch

The Seven-Per-Cent Solution (1976) Nicholas Meyer’s ingenious Sherlock Holmes pastiche.


Blackbeard's Ghost - Ustinov and Jones

Blackbeard’s Ghost (1968) I don’t know how I missed this one when it was released, as I habitually saw every new (or newly reissued) Disney movie, animated or live-action. It’s just possible it didn’t make it to the small Ohio town we were living in then, although every other children’s movie of the time did. In any case, I only discovered it when I came across the Disneyland soundtrack album — receiving the record for Christmas of 1970, I nearly wore it out through re-playing. It was my introduction to Peter Ustinov, who narrated it, and who starred as Blackbeard; the LP featured dialogue, mostly between him and Dean Jones, with a little Suzanne Pleshette shoehorned in, and I was entranced by Ustinov’s idiosyncratic way with a funny line, his ineffable charm, and (to borrow a phrase from Harlan Ellison in a different context) the “ineluctable rodomontade” of his florid verbiage. As I grew older and became more familiar with Ustinov, and with his performances and his work as a playwright and screenwriter, I began to suspect that he had re-written the Blackbeard script (or at least, his lines) as he had on Spartacus. And if you love Ustinov as I do, Blackbeard’s Ghost, while silly, generates a lot of laughter.

Although basing their screenplay on a very good children’s novel by Ben Stahl, in which two boys accidentally conjure up the shade of the pirate, still very much the bloodthirsty ghoul of legend, the movie’s writers (Don Da Gradi and Bill Walsh) ditched that premise in favor of pure comedy, making this far tamer Blackbeard’s more-than-reluctant compatriot the new coach of a hopeless college track team. That the coach is played by Jones is a help; whatever criticisms might be levied at the Disney pictures in which he starred, the actor (on whom I had a slight childish crush) always brought enormous conviction to them, and his outbursts of incredulous anger are as ingratiating as the engaging grin that occasionally splits his handsome face. The slapstick in the picture, directed with no special distinction by Robert Stevenson, is sometimes dopey and occasionally better than that, and the invisibility effects by Eustace Lycett and Robert A. Mattey are, as usual with Disney, well done, as are the lovely background matte paintings by Peter Ellenshaw. The screenplay has a pleasing lightness, enriched by what I again assume were Ustinov’s additions. The laughter the Disney Blu-Ray drew from me was considerable, even if nearly all of it was generated by Ustinov, who still makes me roar at lines I memorized off that record album when I was nine. Although Elliott Reid overdoes his bit as a television sportscaster, Pleshette is, as always, simultaneously biting and adorable as Jones’ inamorata; Joby Baker makes a good showing in the unaccustomed role of the villain; Elsa Lanchester gets a good scene or two as Jones’ dotty landlady; Richard Deacon is amusingly dry as the college dean; and Herbie Faye, Ned Glass, Alan Carney and Gil Lamb all have good bits in Baker’s restaurant-cum-gambling den. The plot revolves in large part around Blackbeard’s old home, maintained as an hotel by his descendants, little old ladies with nothing else to cling to. I mention this because one of them — and I have no idea which — is identified on the imdb as Betty Bronson. That’s a name more forgotten now than it was 50 years ago, but 45 years before, that Bronson was enchanting youngsters as the screen’s first Peter Pan. I would like to think that Walt Disney, one of whose final productions Blackbeard’s Ghost was, knew that, and gave the old trouper a job. Anyway, it would be pretty to think so.


INTO THE WOODS

Anna Kendric sings “On the Steps of the Palace,” my favorite number in Stephen Sondheim’s dark/light score. “He’s a very smart Prince / He’s a Prince who prepares / Knowing this time I’d run from him / He spread pitch on the stairs…”

Into the Woods (2014) Although I have been a Sondheim fanatic since discovering the Company cast album in 1976, and while the original production of Into the Woods was the first Broadway musical I saw before its cast recording had been released, I deliberately avoided the movie of it when it was new, on the basis of two proper names with which it was associated: Disney, and Rob Marshall. Perhaps only in Hollywood could a minimally talented hack like Rob Marshall reap such rewards (and a-wards) by removing the guts from ballsy musical plays like Chicago and Nine. After countless producers and screenwriters, including Larry Gelbart, had worked at it, what was Marshall’s great “break-through” on Chicago? Turning all the musical numbers into dream-fantasies Renee Zellweger imagines. If you have to justify why people are singing and dancing in a musical, why the fuck are you making a musical? Still, with a screenplay by James Lapine, the original book writer and director of Into the Woods, perhaps there was only so much damage Marshall could do to it. Well, it was someone’s brilliant idea to cast the magnificent Simon Russell Beale as the Baker’s Father and then butcher his role so completely he’s left with no songs and only a couple of lines, confusingly delivered, since we can’t tell who he is, whether he’s real or a phantom, and haven’t any idea whether his son (James Corden) knows either; and to let Chris Pine as an 18th century prince sport a trendy two-day growth of beard on his chin.‖ The picture looks splendid, which I attribute largely to its cinematographer (Dion Beebe), set decorator (Anna Pinnock), costumer (Colleen Atwood) and production designer (Dennis Gassner). And it’s largely well cast, with actors who can sing: Corden; Meryl Streep, sardonic but subdued as The Witch; lovely Emily Blunt as The Baker’s Wife; cute Daniel Huttlestone as a full-throated Jack; Lilla Crawford as a foghorn-voiced Little Red Riding Hood; Johnny Depp as her Wolf; Tracey Ullman as Jack’s Mother; and Anna Kendrick who, although attractive only from a single angle… and that one her director seldom favors… is an otherwise charming and effective Cinderella. Into the Woods was significantly better than I’d expected. Yet I still tremble whenever I hear another name yoked with this director’s: Follies. Hasn’t that poor show suffered enough?

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
‖As my friend Eliot M. Camarena once asked, do people like that when they’re children announce, “When I grow up, I wanna look like Fred C. Dobbs!”?


the-art-of-love-lg

The Art of Love (1965) A surprisingly brainless affair to have come from the typewriter of the witty Carl Reiner, riding high in 1965 with the deserved success of “The Dick Van Dyke Show,” which he created and oversaw, and for which he wrote many of the most memorable early episodes. The best thing about this moderately black farce concerning a failed American artist in Paris whose supposed suicide instantly drives up the prices fetched for his work by his duplicitous best friend (James Garner) is Van Dyke as the artist. His comedic timing, seemingly boneless body and inimitable way with a line or a situation are the equal of the great comedians he worshiped, and it’s one of the ironies of modern history that he came along at a time when movie and television comedies were so often loud, witless and inane. Had Blake Edwards not already collared Peter Sellers and Jack Lemmon, what a find Van Dyke would have been for that fellow student of slapstick!

Reiner can’t really be blamed for the general dopiness of the movie, since he was working from an existing story by two other writers (Alan Simmons and William Sackheim) and the movie’s young director, Norman Jewison, doesn’t appear to have been a great deal of help to him. The Art of Love is attractive to look at — it was shot by Russell Metty — but inert, marking time with things like Angie Dickinson’s fainting shtick (it’s funny the first time), Elke Sommers’ perpetual innocent act and the braying of Ethel Merman, apparently cast as a madam just so she could belt out an instantly forgettable nightclub number. The usually ingratiating Garner has little to play here but his character’s cheesy self-centeredness, and Reiner stoops to such things as plunking a cartoon Brooklynite Yiddishe couple (Irving Jacobson and Naomi Stevens) in the middle of Paris. Still, Jay Novello has a couple of funny bits as a nervous janitor and little Pierre Olaf does miracle work as an umbrella-toting police detective, Cy Coleman provided a perky score (with additional music by Frank Skinner), and DePatie-Freleng came up with some modestly amusing main title animation. There’s little excuse, however, for a comedy — especially one with Dick Van Dyke — whose only big laugh comes at the very end, and absolutely none for its indulging in such feeble wheezes as the periodic introduction of a Madame Defarge-like hag, complete with knitting needles, who shows up every now and then to screech her delight at Garner’s impending execution. But at least I now understand what my mother meant when she once told me that after seeing this one on television when I was a boy I walked around the house for a week saying, “Guillotine! Guillotine!”


Murder by Decree

Murder by Decree (1978) That Sherlock Holmes occupied a revered, albeit fictional, place in the same late Victorian Britain that saw the appalling murders in Whitechapel has intrigued Sherlockians for decades. What more natural meeting could there be than between Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s brilliant consulting detective and “Saucy Jacky,” as that figure of horror known popularly as Jack the Ripper styled himself in a letter to the papers? Derek Ford and Donald Ford (the former known primarily for his snickering sex comedies) imagined Holmes investigating the murders in the 1965 A Study in Terror, and the same year in which this more recent attempt was released saw the publication of Michael Didbin’s dark little novel The Last Sherlock Holmes Story, very much concerned with Jack. The elements are there even in the mind’s eye: The dimly gaslit cobblestone streets, the hansom cabs and private cabriolets, the enveloping fog that swallows up forms, faces and screams of terror and pain. That Bob Clark, the onlie begettor of Porky’s should, of all people, have directed as beautiful a fiction as Murder by Decree is as puzzling as his making that evocative adaptation of Jean Shepherd, A Christmas Story. But then, as Orson Welles once told Bogdanovich, “Peter, you only need one.”

The literate screenplay by the playwright John Hopkins emphasizes a more riant, and more passionate, Holmes than is the norm, and Christopher Plummer could scarcely be bettered in the role as the filmmakers, if not Conan Doyle, conceived it. His performance reaches two peaks, one infinitely quiet (his reaction to Geneviève Bujold’s heartbreaking madwoman), the other bristling with outrage at what his betters (including John Gielgud as the Prime Minister, unidentified in the picture but clearly made up to resemble Robert Gascoyne-Cecil) have been up to. Hopkins also, blessedly, gives us a Watson who is as far from the Nigel Bruce model as can be imagined. And while the irreplaceable James Mason is a bit hoary for the role, his aplomb is undeniable; a moment of especial charm is the way he expresses dismay at Holmes, and with a look of genuine hurt, when the former squashes the lone pea on the doctor’s plate. And if he is occasionally the voice of hidebound Empire, Mason’s (and Hopkins’) Watson is also equally as capable of wit as Holmes as, for example, when Sherlock asks his compatriot why his friend deems him only “the prince of detectives” and wishes to know who is king. I won’t spoil the joke here, nor the conclusion of this intricately plotted exercise, based on some theories by Elwyn Jones and John Lloyd in their contemporaneous book The Ripper File.

The exceptional cast includes a starchily smug and imperious Gielgud; the wrenching Bujold; Frank Finlay as an uncharacteristically deferential Inspector Lestrade; David Hemmings as the police inspector in charge of the case (and who bears absolutely no relationship to the very real Frederick Abberline); Susan Clark as a heartrending Mary Kelly; Anthony Quayle as the dangerously reactionary Sir Charles Warren; Peter Jonfield as a chillingly psychotic chief villain; and Donald Sutherland as the shaken spiritualist Robert Lees, who believes he’s seen the Ripper. Despite a few unnecessary visual flourishes, Clark’s eye is nearly unerring, abetted to an exceptional degree by the rich and expressive cinematography by Reginald H. Morris and the astonishing production design of Harry Pottle; I don’t know whether Pottle is responsible for the staggeringly effective matte paintings of London used in the picture, but whoever painted them, they put you absolutely there. The only real miscalculation in the movie is the highly derivative musical score by Paul Zaza and Carl Zittrer from which I heard distinct liftings from John Williams (the scene in Jaws of Richard Dreyfus investigating Ben Gardner’s boat), Jerry Goldsmith and Bernard Herrmann (those eerie strings) and Richard Rodney Bennett (the opening sequence of Murder on the Orient Express) and in which — aside from the plaintive traditional Irish tune for Mary Kelly — there is little that is either original, interesting, useful or pleasing to the ear.


Text copyright 2019 by Scott Ross

Nothing is to be trusted: “The Tamarind Seed” (1974)

Standard

The Tamarind Seed A70-7154

By Scott Ross

With The Tamarind Seed we come to an essential concern of movies: The pleasures that lie in a certain level of sheer, sustained craftsmanship.

I remember as a 13-year-old seeing newspaper ads for the picture when it was released. I was interested, because it starred Julie Andrews, for whom I had and have an abiding fondness, and I’d seen paperback copies of the Evelyn Anthony novel on which it was based, but the movie was there and gone before I could get to it. What I didn’t know then was that it was written and directed by Blake Edwards, a name I only associated at the time with the Pink Panther cartoons which bore his possessive credit and which were at that time a staple of Saturday mornings, and the splendid 1965 super-comedy The Great Race, which I’d seen televised in a memorable, successive Sunday night airing in 1972.

Finally catching up with The Tamarind Seed on home video, I wasn’t expecting a great deal — the movie dates from a notably bad period of Edwards’ life and career. First came the disaster of Darling Lili, for which he’d received all the opprobrium despite his wanting to make a comedy with his new wife and the studio (Paramount) insisting that, since it was a Julie Andrews picture, it had to stuffed with big musical numbers, expenses be damned, and insisting he film World War I aeroplane sequences in a part of Ireland where in summer it rains every day. As if that poisonous experience was not enough, his exquisitely beautiful 1970 Western Wild Rovers was butchered by Jim Aubrey at MGM and the writer-director subsequently renounced its follow-up, 1971’s The Carey Treatment, which also bore the traces of Aubrey’s fine Italian hand; not for nothing did they call him The Smiling Cobra. Edwards and Andrews retreated to Europe, where he vowed to concentrate on screenwriting and to never direct a picture again. It’s a period he later spoofed in his riotous 1981 Hollywood satire S.O.B., but at the time it was anything but amusing either to him or to his wife and muse.

While The Tamarind Seed broke no box-office records, neither was it an expensive flop, as Edwards’ previous three pictures had been. (Modestly budgeted at a little under 2 and half million dollars, it returned a respectable $13 million worldwide.) More importantly, it gave Edwards back his confidence; his next three pictures, resurrecting Inspector Clouseau and rescuing Peter Sellers’ sputtering movie career, are the work of a man who, despite his recurrent depressions — Andrews called him “Blakie” but to others he was “Blackie” — is in complete command of his craft. And that’s what you take away from The Tamarind Seed; it’s not notably deep or especially resonant emotionally, but it’s gently compelling, occasionally inspired, and throughout exhibits the deft touch of a filmmaker who knows not only where to place the camera for maximum impact but as well the virtue of intelligent dialogue and when to hold on interesting actors; as Orson Welles noted in reference to John Ford’s penchant for extended medium-full shots, with that sort of confidence, a director “doesn’t need to bang around.”

The Tamarind Seed - Blake and Julie

Blake Edwards and Julie Andrews during the filming of The Tamarind Seed.

It helps, of course, to have good material. Despite Leonard Maltin’s belief that the picture illustrates what “a competent director can do with sappy material,” there is nothing remotely “sappy” about Anthony’s 1970 novel. Indeed, 90 per cent of Edwards’ literate dialogue comes directly from Anthony, and what doesn’t imitates her style. If the writer-director occasionally loses a plangent moment from the original author (such as the lingering touch between her protagonists just before a disaster — a memory that will come to haunt one of them) he more than compensates with curlicues of his own, like the long, nearly wordless suspense sequence at the airport which, in its intricacy and wit, is one I can well imagine the original novelist regarding with envy, as James M. Cain was said to feel about the ending Billy Wilder and Raymond Chandler developed for Double Indemnity.*

And if Sharif and Andrews aren’t exactly Bogart and Bergman… well, who is? Andrews is called upon to exhibit one of her strengths as a dramatic performer, that rather lovely pensiveness and reserve that hints at troubled waters, and Sharif is allowed to relax the rigidity and tortured emotionalism that marred his work in Funny Girl and Doctor Zhivago respectively and to display an easy charm which can be read more than one way. Indeed, The Tamarind Seed, novel and picture, hinge on our not quite knowing from the start what this senior Russian apparatchik is really up to. He even twits the Andrews character on this, suggesting that she is far too trusting of his nature. When she protests that, despite his stated cynicism he is kind and generous he ripostes, “Kind and generous to you, perhaps — because I hope to get something out of it.” He could mean getting her into bed, his stated aim, or that he hopes to recruit her to the Soviet cause, which is what he tells his Paris Embassy coeval, the catlike General played with beetle-browed inscrutability by the equally feline Oscar Homolka. We have our suspicions, but it’s to Edwards’ credit that he keeps us guessing well into the picture. (Anthony, going into the characters’ thoughts, tips her hand rather sooner.) This ambiguity is made manifest when Sharif, watching Andrews’ cab drive out of sight at the end of her stay in Barbados during which they (conveniently?) meet, turns away and smiles enigmatically.

Appropriately enough for a movie concerned to a large degree with international spies (and as Peter Lehman and William Luhr point out in the first of their two studies of Edwards) looking is something the picture emphasizes. The human gaze is emphasized during the opening titles, which begin with an extreme close-up on Andrews’ right eye. (Curiously, Lehman and Luhr make the mistake of thinking the main title sequence is Edwards’ when it’s clearly  — and after five seconds, identifiably — the work of the veteran James Bond title designer Maurice Binder.) The people in The Tamarind Seed are constantly on guard against, and watching, each other. Andrews’ Judith Fallows, rebounding from a bad love affair, itself preceded by the death of a husband for whom she feels the guilt of her own waning affections before his fatal crash, eyes Sharif’s Fyodor Sverdlov warily, as he and most of the other characters involved regard everyone else… and with equally good reason. That human gaze is used in especially amusing ways during that airport sequence cited above when, in a sustained shot of Andrews, the British agent assigned to watch her (and of whom she is ignorant) and a KGB operative out to thwart Sverdlov, in irregular line on what is rather unsettlingly called a people-mover, each occasionally turn to look around, averting his or her gaze before he or she can be seen watching. And while I don’t go in much for symbols, and am generally leery of filmmakers who do, there is a pointed cut in the picture between Sharif in an old-fashioned elevator at the Russian Embassy and a tiger angrily pacing his cage at the London Zoo that makes for a nice instant metaphor: Like the animal, Sverdlov is trapped in a situation not of his making; unlike the tiger, however, the Russian has contrived a plan of escape.

The Tamarind Seed - Andrews and Quayle

Edwards’ Judith Fallows sparring with Anthony Quayle’s mercurial British security chief. Note the salmon-colored bookcase behind her.

The filmmaker’s color palette is also telling. That close-up on Andrews’ eye in the titles is seen beneath a stark blue filter; once Sharif enters the credit sequence, everything is in deep (Communist?) red.† Edwards appears to have taken a cue from a passage in Anthony’s novel, in which Judith and Sverdlov visit a discotheque where the patrons are bathed in red light, and from Judith’s assessment of herself as True Blue; hints of blue and red, or pastel pink, are sprinkled unobtrusively throughout the picture (Judith’s London townhouse is trimmed in salmon), the whole of it beautifully lit and shot by the redoubtable Freddy Young.

Anthony’s book is one of many written during the period of the late 1960s and early ’70s which take as their starting point those deplorable tensions between East and West that, at their worst, in the autumn of 1962, damn near ended in what it used to please the bureaucrats to call “mutual assured destruction” and which, out of the desperate lies of a failed hack politician to excuse her predicted loss against a game-show host, again threaten at their worst to annihilate us all. As in John Huston’s 1970 adaptation of Noel Behn’s The Kremlin Letter, a remarkable Cold War thriller that didn’t capture anything like the wide audience it deserved, trust in anyone here is the very epitome of foolhardiness. Or, as Anthony Quayle’s security chief Jack Loder observes: “My line of business has taught me three things: No one is to be trusted, nothing is to be believed, and anyone is capable of doing anything.”

The chiefest irony of that statement is that Loder makes it to the very man to whom he should not, if he only knew it, be telling secrets: The British minister Fergus Stephenson (Dan O’Herlihy, billed here as “Daniel”), a remnant of the 1930s Cambridge “Homintern,” complete with bitter, shrewish, status-conscious wife (Sylvia Syms) and the one figure most immediately threatened by Sverdlov’s decision to defect to the West. Anthony has, for the period, remarkable compassion for Fergus in her novel, and Edwards and O’Herlihy share it. While Homolka is allowed to glower and sneer like the proverbial villainous spymaster of yore,‡ O’Herlihy’s Stephenson is depicted as a gentle, likable figure, hideously yoked to a wife who loathes him, who takes in younger lovers and who enjoys throwing that fact in his face. If Mrs. Stephenson is, as she seems, the embodiment of what her husband took to despising in his youth, the audience — even the Western movie audience of 1974 — may well have forgiven him for coming to that conclusion.

The Tamarind Seed 9174_0020__20151015141958

Another on-set photo, shot under red light.

That Judith remains in reserve nearly to the end, only at the last succumbing to the blandishments of the would-be lover she describes as “the most persistent man I’ve ever met” (and which sensual pleasure Anthony denies her right up to the novel’s last page) makes her eventual realization of her true feelings all the more moving. I won’t divulge the picture’s climax, or its aftermath, except to note that it is the most quietly satisfying conclusion imaginable to an international romantic thriller. Interestingly, Edwards indulges a whiff of emotional fantasy in his use of the eponymous ovule, which the more pragmatic British novelist disdained. For Anthony, as for Sverdlov, the myth of the fabled seed as a kind of fairy-tale is just that; Edwards sides with Judith. His solution may be less practical, but it both satisfies our emotions and buoys the story’s insistence on the existence of a certain innocence necessary to sustain human relations, especially in matters of love.

Which brings me nicely to John Barry’s spare, quasi-Bondian score. It’s essentially variations on a theme, or rather two themes: The first, for Judith, is for all intents and purposes the love motif, but is so hauntingly orchestrated with the composer’s trademark long string lines that it assumes darker dimensions, appropriate not only to the narrative’s intrigue but to the character’s own uncertain heart. The second, which Barry uses to underscore the intricate thriller sequences of the picture’s final third, consists of 12 notes and their close variants, with a terse snare accompaniment interspersed with Morse Code-like accents breaking in at intervals as the tension increases. (If you’ve heard and admired Barry’s scores for The Ipcress File and They Might Be Giants, you might know the sort of thing I mean.) The early ’70s was a period during which Edwards was temporarily on the outs with his usual composer Henry Mancini over an incorrectly perceived betrayal on Darling Lili, and it cost Mancini Wild Rovers, for which Jerry Goldsmith wrote a score whose beauty and melancholy perfectly matches that of the movie. Barry fills in nicely for Mancini here, who was equally capable of muscular writing like this but who did not get the opportunity nearly often enough.

Approach The Tamarind Seed with the right set of expectations, and I think you’ll find its subtleties and strengths, and the wit with which it regards its people and politics, thoroughly entertaining. It’s a real writer-director’s picture, made with intelligence for an intelligent audience. Both are as rare these days as the level of knowing, understated craftsmanship of which Blake Edwards at his best was eminently capable.


*Edwards also juggled the novel’s settings: The Anthony book is laid in Washington, D.C. and New York; the movie takes place in Paris and London. The change is negligible, but for a self-imposed exile like Edwards, Europe must have felt far more hospitable than America, a country to which in 1974 he never thought he’d return.

†I seem to be arguing against myself here, but I presume the writer-director guided Binder’s basic imagery; I just don’t think everything in the main title can necessarily be ascribed to him.

‡That Holmolka looks remarkably like then-Soivet premier Leonid Brezhnev is surely not a coincidence.

Text copyright 2018 by Scott Ross

The Tamarind Seed

Note the touch: Sverdlov holds Judith’s hand as often as he can. She resists for as long as she can. (Photo by Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images)

Enigma variation: “Lawrence of Arabia” (1962)

Standard

By Scott Ross

David Lean’s best movie is one of the few intelligent — even intellectual — epics. It’s certainly unique in focusing on an essentially unknowable protagonist. Despite its essential… shall we call it a misinterpretation of history, as opposed to deliberate dishonesty?… about Lawrence, who in life betrayed the very Arabs he pretended to be liberating, the movie is an overwhelming experience on the big screen, which is really the only way to see it; no matter how wide your television, this is the sort of movie for which 70mm was created. If you aren’t watching those vast expanses of sand, or the train blown off the rails and heading pell-mell toward the camera, on a huge canvas, you aren’t really seeing them at all.

There’s a great cast (Alec Guinness, Anthony Quinn, Anthony Quayle, Jose Ferrer, Omar Sharif and Claude Rains); a literate and remarkably suggestive screenplay (initially credited to Robert Bolt; the blacklisted Michael Wilson’s credit was restored decades later); an iconic score by Maurice Jarre; and best of all, Peter O’Toole’s stunning central performance.

Among the movie’s many pleasures is what I consider the single finest edit in the history of the movies. It’s certainly one of the most elegant and economical:
Lawrence, in profile, blows out a match, and Lean immediately cuts to a humbling vista of sun-drenched desert.

I don’t know whether the notion for this transition was Lean’s — a noted film editor before he took to directing — or that of his editor, Anne V. Coates, or indeed the suggestion of one or more of his screenwriters. My money is on Lean. But whatever its provenance, it’s a thrilling moment, one of the highest in all of world cinema.

Text copyright 2013 by Scott Ross