Monthly Report: May 2024

Standard

By Scott Ross

Note to my new “followers” in the Mossad and SBU who are unusually interested in a more or less harmless blog about old movies, presumably scheduling their visits here in between making threats to reporters, commentators, college students and international criminal courts: There is nothing in the installment below concerning either American-funded Banderite Nazis or Zionist psychotics, so you needn’t bother visiting this month… but thank you as always for your splendid interest.


As ever, click on the highlighted links for longer reviews &cet.

The Bohemian Girl (1936) For those of us who love Laurel and Hardy, the largest stumbling block to full enjoyment of their feature-length movies is pace. I don’t mean the comedians themselves. We accept that Stan and Ollie’s brand of humor, the way their characters react to each other, operates on a plane vastly different from most screen comics, particularly in their sound work; next to Laurel and Hardy and W.C. Fields, the Marx Brothers look like a band of delinquents hopped up on speed. With their feature-length pictures, it’s that everything else around L & H is enervated which detracts from the full appreciation of their genius.

I’m not sure where the blame for this lies, although I strongly suspect it originates with their producer. Those of us who grew up watching the old Our Gang shorts (renamed “The Little Rascals” for television) recognize the long takes and reaction shots, the dead spaces that drag on unto infinity, or until the last moron in the house has gotten the joke, not to mention the stock LeRoy Shields and Marvin Hatley tunes playing endlessly and without the slightest recourse to syncopation with the action or dialogue. One can accept that this sort of filler was perhaps necessary (or deemed necessary, anyway) in the very early talkies, but by 1936 it reeked of laziness, and even incompetence. These seem to me the very hallmarks of the Hal Roach house-style, as is the repeated featuring of Roach’s biggest stars in numbingly outmoded 19th and very early 20th century operettas: The Rogue Song (1930; no complete prints of which exist), Fra Diavolo (1933), Babes in Toyland (1934) and this, the weakest of these titles still extant. It isn’t, this time out, merely the leaden pace that sinks the movie, or the terrible songs, but the constant tampering with the material and the death (a possible murder) during production of Thelma Todd, briefly seen lip-syncing to a typically maudlin ballad. Mae Busch is on hand, and that’s to the good, as is James Finlayson’s presence as an overzealous palace guard and charming little Darla Hood’s, then in her first year with “Our Gang,” as the landed child Busch kidnaps and leaves with Ollie, her cuckolded husband.

Very little else works in The Bohemian Girl, and even Stan and Ollie’s routines fail to raise more than the occasional smile. (I laughed out loud exactly once, but the prospect of running the picture a second time, even in fast-forward, to see what elicited that response would tax a well man, and I’d been under the weather for a week.) Worse, the ending involves one of those grotesque sight-gags so beloved by Stan which would be horrible enough glimpsed quickly or obliquely but which is extended in case that prototypical moron I cited above didn’t catch the meaning at first glance. Laurel often had to be talked out of these things by others, and the frequent recurrence of cruelty toward these two characters in their pictures is baffling. It’s one thing when gruesome things happen to the Three Stooges; they’re live-action cartoon characters anyway, so the pain and discomfort (and even, at an extreme, the deaths) they experience don’t hurt. But didn’t Stan understand by 1936 that he and Ollie were, however silly their actions might be, real, and beloved? You don’t want to see the heads of gentle, cherished comedians mounted on a hunter’s wall just for the sake of a laugh. That’s a gag Laurel was dissuaded from including in one of the team’s two-reelers, but the one here is nearly as horrid.


Universal’s idea of blood splatter, ca. 1974: Animated blobs of crimson clumsily splashed over the image of dead bodies in an elevator.

Earthquake (1974) Pauline Kael generously observed of this by-the-numbers ’70s disaster movie that it was “swill, but not cheap.” She was wrong. It’s both swill and cheap. Universal had watched while Irwin Allen raked in millions on The Poseidon Adventure (1972) and was determined to beat him at his own game. An increasingly ludicrous series of Airport sequels was in the works and this utter lox of a movie, calculated to rival Allen’s The Towering Inferno in the Christmas box-office sweepstakes, played very successfully on the national mood. Perhaps, had Mario Puzo been able to work longer on the screenplay he originated for it (he was contractually obligated to The Godfather Part II and had to leave the project before it was completed) Earthquake might have been less pointless and absurd, but I doubt it. (The other credited screenwriter, George Fox, was a magazine writer who had never written a play or movie.) I don’t know why Kael was so forgiving about them but what’s shocking to me, at a 50-year remove, is seeing now just how shoddy the special effects were. Aside from his usual painterly matte shots, Albert Whitlock’s “visual effects” could scarcely have passed muster on an ABC Movie of the Week of that era: Big obvious blocks of Styrofoam fall on screaming victims in the streets, the violent deaths of people in a high-rise elevator is represented by a sudden splash of animated blood across the field of vision and as the buildings burst open and fall apart you’re aware of precisely how calculated, and essentially phony, every move is along the way.

Even the cast, compared to Poseidon and Inferno, feels second-rate, as if they’ve wandered in from the Universal TV movie they were shooting on an adjacent lot. Aside from Charlton Heston and Geneviève Bujold, who provide the only conviction the picture can work up as hapless lovers, Ava Gardner alternately rages and swoons as Heston’s appallingly needy, termagant wife; the one-time child evangelist Marjoe Gortner snarls at everyone as a ticking-bomb psycho who is either a) a closet-case, b) a mass-killer, c) a would-be heterosexual rapist, or all three at once; George Kennedy as an LAPD cop has either to rage at the human condition or perform acts of saintliness; Richard Roundtree and Gabriel Dell storm around in desperate search of characters to play; Victoria Principal is asked to thrust out her alleged 36-inch bust and pretend to be flattered as a bunch of men drool over her; Lloyd Nolan as a doctor corralled to aid the injured of downtown L.A. barks out orders and seems roughly as compassionate toward his charges as the Orkin man would be to a nest of cockroaches; while Lorne Greene and Barry Sullivan exude, respectively, kindness and concern as… no, it’s too boring even to tell you. One of the few “A”-list stars, Walter Matthau, has an entirely unfunny extended cameo as a bewildered bar drunk wearing what looks like one of Bella Abzug’s cast-off hats.

Matthau. And you thought I was kidding about the hat.

John Williams, whose previous assignment was composing the superb score for The Towering Inferno, came to Earthquake utterly spent creatively: His music is so dispirited it depends on wholesale lifts from Inferno and contains nothing like that score’s breathtaking highs. The gifted Philip H. Lathrop could apparently do little for the look of the picture but its direction, by that hack Mark Robson, has even less flavor and flair than a typical episode of “Columbo.” Not that any of this mattered: Made on a budget of $6,675,125, the picture pulled in $167.4 million at the box-office, representing something like $154 million profit on the initial investment. Everyone must have been happy, except the stars, and the unfortunate ticket-buyers who sat through this abortion.*


Blue Sky (1991/1994) Usually when a movie sits on the shelf as long as this one (four years) it’s either because it’s a mess, or the financing studio has no confidence in the picture and doesn’t know what to do with it, or even whether to bother releasing it at all, but although Blue Sky went unreleased due to the collapse of Orion, it’s also a mess. The original screenwriter, Rama Laurie Stagner, based the characters and situation on her family and the movie has the weirdly bifurcated feel of clear-eyed reminiscence grafted onto sheer wish-fulfillment. (The credited re-writers were Arlene Sarner and Jerry Leichtling.) Blue Sky works best when it concentrates on the marriage between Carly and Hank Marshall (Jessica Lange and Tommy Lee Jones), their relationships with their teenage daughters (Amy Locane and Anna Klemp) and the way Carly’s overpowering sexuality causes seemingly endless problems for the four. It is much less successful when it turns around and tries desperately to turn Carly into a heroine fearlessly taking on all comers in an effort to clear Hank’s name when he is unceremoniously dumped in a psych ward and kept insensible on forced psychotropic medication. A military scientist in the early 1960s whose field is monitoring radiation at nuclear testing ranges, Hank is outraged when a test is not called off despite a pair of civilians wandering into the field. His insubordination is the excuse for locking him up but what really rankles his married C.O. (Powers Booth) is his own abortive affair with Carly. The narrative’s mix of personal and political is not integrated — it’s schizophrenic, as if two different sorts of movies had been squeezed together so that the result is neither the fish of personalized drama nor the fowl of social activism. Additionally, and despite its often effective adult content, Blue Sky most resembles an idealization of a “good” parent (Hank) and the excoriation of a “bad” one (Carly). Worse, while the Marshalls, young and old, are depicted with precision, nearly everyone else comes off as a type, bloodless and not living so much as fulfilling basic dramatic requirements, the sort a first-time writer with an axe to grind is prone to. The schematism affects and detracts from everything, including the splendid performances by Lange and Jones, the good one by Locane and the direction by Tony Richardson, whose last picture this was. (He died, of, as they say, “AIDS-related complications,” in 1991, long before the movie was released.) Booth, like his character, is so unpleasant it’s nearly impossible to credit Carly’s attraction to him, and poor Carrie Snodgress, as his long-suffering wife, instead of a character is given attitudes to play, all of them eminently predictable. The icing on the cake is the typically awful score by Jack Nitzsche, complete with his usual hokey riffs on glass harmonica. Nitzsche, a fine arranger of other people’s music, was an object lesson in elevating to composter status someone whose bag of tricks was of extremely limited interest.

On a note of bizarre coincidence, Nitzsche once beat Snodgress with a handgun, threatening to kill her and, in quintessential Hollywood fashion that would never apply to you or me, got off with three years’ probation.


Let’s Dance (1950) Topic for a master’s thesis in film history: “Why Betty Hutton?” Aside from Preston Sturges’ subversive comedy The Miracle of Morgan’s Creek (and she can be a trial there as well) I find that even minimal exposure to her extreme mugging and overblown vocalization causes the muscles in my jaw to tighten automatically… that is, when it doesn’t make my eyes glaze over entirely. Although she can be relatively inoffensive dramatically her basic persona, brash when not shrill, is repellant, like a distaff Jerry Lewis. My aversion to Hutton has kept me, despite my near-reverence for Fred Astaire, from seeing Let’s Dance but a new Blu-ray edition from Kino Lorber effectively cancelled my long-standing eschewal. Having finally seen it I dislike Betty Hutton as much as I ever have, but I found Let’s Dance itself surprisingly painless, if entirely inconsequential and, two good routines by him notwithstanding, a title that in no way burnishes Astaire’s filmography. He made worse musicals before this one — You’ll Never Get Rich, Blue Skies and Second Chorus are genuinely bad and only one of them has an Astaire dance worthy of his time and ingenuity — but never, I don’t think, was he paired with a female co-star with whom he had less sympathy. Although he spoke highly of Hutton (amazingly, to me, he was much more discomfited by Kay Thompson, with whom he had one of his best duets, in Funny Face) and her adeptness as a dancer is comparable to that of Judy Garland, there is not a trace of chemistry between the pair and in only one number (the comic “Oh, Them Dudes,” which she plays in cowboy drag) do they express, briefly and joyously, a sense of teamwork or real pleasure in each other’s company.

The plot, which seems rather obviously inspired by the 1930s custody battle between her mother and aunt over the child Gloria Vanderbilt, is complicated for a screen musical, and turns on a dime at the end when the condescending aunt by marriage suddenly and inexplicably relents. (That the old Boston dragon is played by the likeable Lucile Watson at least mitigates some of her character’s appalling snobbery, and she gets a brief, charming waltz with Astaire to an old-fashioned tune.) For a picture called Let’s Dance, there is very little dancing, and Fred’s best number is the “Piano Dance,” with lively music by Tommy Chambers, Van Cleave and Astaire himself, during which he performs over, under and all around an upright and a baby grand, the latter of which, when the music segues to “Hold That Tiger,” explodes with cats.

Allan Scott, Astaire’s frequent RKO scenarist, wrote the often witty screenplay, with, as they used to say, additional dialogue by Dane Lussier and the pleasing songs are by Frank Loesser, fresh off the shockingly successful Guys and Dolls on Broadway. The period Technicolor is rather more subdued than usual, although Let’s Dance indulges in the hoariest of movie-musical clichés: The theatre (or in this case, nightclub) with the impossibly large performing space on which unfold activities never seen this side of a Hollywood soundstage. Norman Z. McLeod, who in palmier days directed the peerless It’s a Gift for W.C. Fields and for the Marx Brothers, Monkey Business and what I consider the team’s funniest picture, Horsefeathers, keeps the nonsense moving at a crisp pace and the good supporting cast includes Roland Young and Melville Cooper as Watson’s attorneys, Ruth Warrick as her sympathetic daughter, George Zucco as a judge and little Gregory Moffett as the widowed Hutton’s little boy, around whom the legal machinations whirl. Moffett gives a lovely performance, entirely free of guile, at least until the final moments when he’s made to look silly.


The Unsinkable Molly Brown (1964) If you accept that it bears, aside from her experience as a survivor of the Titanic and the fact she was married to the wealthy miner J.J. “Johnny” Brown, virtually no relation to the facts of Margaret Tobin Brown’s biography, the picture represents one of the few 1960s Hollywood musicals that is engaging and not just big. Tammy Grimes, who originated the role on Broadway — and was, absurdly, given a Tony as Featured Actress for her starring performance† — had no chance of reprising her role on film, and Molly Brown was planned for Shirley MacLaine, until Hal Wallis put the kibosh on that by claiming she was still under contract to him. The director, Charles Walters, didn’t want her but Debbie Reynolds got the role, for which she had campaigned strenuously, and was subsequently nominated for an Academy Award. (She lost, to Julie Andrews, for what Reynold’s daughter Carrie Fisher wittily called Andrews’ “stunning, multi-layered and moving portrayal of Mary Poppins. Ibsen’s Mary Poppins.”) MacLaine would almost certainly have given a better dramatic (and dancing) performance but her singing voice, good in its way if belty, lacked the warmth, variety and emotional vulnerability of Reynolds’. In any case, the star is well-matched by Harve Presnell’s likeable performance (and his classical baritone) as Johnny and the Meredith Willson score, although its songstack was eviscerated in the transfer from the stage is, even in abbreviated form, beautifully conceived and idiosyncratically realized, the way his The Music Man was. (He composed Johnny Brown’s arias with Presnell’s voice in mind, and it shows.) Only five of the Broadway songs made it to the movie, with an additional three (“Beautiful People of Denver,” “Dolce Far Niente” and “Up Where the People Are”) heard as underscore and a sixth vocal number (“He’s My Friend”) added by Willson to the soundtrack.

Helen Deutsch’s screenplay, based on the Broadway book by Richard Morris, occasionally indulges in bathos, and a little inconsistency, as when Molly encounters her Denver, Colorado nemesis Mrs. McGraw (Audrey Christie) in Europe just before securing a berth on the Titanic, yet McGraw is somehow in Denver to greet her at the finale, or when Johnny is introduced with the exuberant “Colorado, My Home” before we have any idea who he is. Interestingly, the number that provides the greatest audience pleasure, as the kind of elaborate song-and-dance set-piece that can work so well on stage but which seldom replicates that performance excitement on the screen, is the one Willson wrote for the movie. MGM, however, was siphoning so much money to Doctor Zhivago that “He’s My Friend” nearly went un-filmed until the cast agreed to shoot it in a single day, with three cameras. When it’s not being limited by matte shots and indifferent rear-projection (and, during the sinking of the Titanic, black-and-white clips from two pervious movies) Daniel L. Fapp’s cinematography is frequently luscious, Peter Gennaro’s choreography is lively and inventive and Morton Haack’s fulsome costumes include a rich, red ballgown for Reynolds that nearly rivals the one Walter Plunkett designed for Vivien Leigh in Gone with the Wind. The unusually fulsome supporting cast includes Ed Begley as Molly’s adoptive father, Hermione Baddeley as his inamorata with the wonderful name Buttercup Grogan, Hayden Rorke as a prissy society columnist, and George Mitchell in a pleasant performance as a monsignor. Grover Dale and Gus Trikonis as Molly’s old friends dance energetically, and the wonderful Martita Hunt provides one of her beguiling extended cameos as a grand duchess who befriends the Browns. As a bittersweet reminder of what befalls yesterday’s darlings, the gifted silent comedienne Minta Durfee appears briefly in a party scene.

Look, by the way, for a photo of the real Molly Brown and you’ll realize instantly just how apt the casting of Kathy Bates was in Titanic.


Luath (played by Rink), Tao (Syn Cat) and Bodger (Muffy) in a rare moment of rest.

The Incredible Journey (1963) Sheila Burnford’s 1961 novel about three pets making an impossible homeward trek across the Canadian wilderness is one of the loveliest of all fictions about animals, and while the Walt Disney adaptation loses a great deal of what makes it special, its essentials remain. James Algar’s screenplay attempts to compensate for the elimination of authorial voice with narration spoken by Rex Allen and while it is only partly successful, Burnford’s empathetic prose, her keen appreciation of the human/animal bond, and of the ways of cats and dogs, remains, in posse if not in esse; the entire project is lit with the special grace that attends movies made with loving kindness, particularly movies about animals. The trio at the center of the story (the young golden retriever Luath, the Siamese cat Tao and the elderly English pit bull terrier Bodger) are devoted to each other, especially Tao and Bodger, and that unusual affection suffuses the movie and gives it its unemphatic emotional power. Humans make their requisite appearances throughout the story, but they do so unobtrusively for the most part, at least until the satisfying finale, where the love of a boy for his lifelong pet gives the conclusion a depth of feeling that has exactly the right resonance.


Banjo the Woodpile Cat (1979) This animated short (27 minutes) directed by Don Bluth and executed by his fellow Disney animators Gary Goldman and John Pomeroy as a personal protest against recent trends at the studio is, like most of Bluth’s later pictures, attractive to the eye, annoying to the ear and insulting to the brain. (Of those I’ve seen, only his feature debut, the vivid Robert C. O’Brien adaptation The Secret of NIMH, was wholly satisfying, perhaps because unlike Bluth’s many originals, it was based on a solid, well-plotted literary source.) The story is by Bluth and his gifted brother Toby, and to a weird degree reflects their Mormon background: Early on a nasty old feedtruck driver headed for the Big Town cackles to an equally unsavory friend about the “good times” he’s going to have in… Salt Lake City, that well-known Utahan hell of fleshpots and loose women. Bluth also wrote the numbingly bad title song, which he pushes relentlessly throughout the action, and the designs of his cat characters voiced by the black actors Scatman Crothers and Beau Richards have, in contrast to all the other felines in the picture, fat, underslung lower lips. And they call Dumbo racist!


13 Washington Square (1928) Hitherto unknown to me, this comic thriller from the year that saw the end of silent pictures has been beautifully restored by Kino Lorber in gorgeous sepia tone and proves, if nothing else, that ZaSu Pitts was as funny a silent comedian as she was a sound comic. The story, adapted by Harry O. Hoyt and Walter Anthony from a novel and play by Leroy Scott, is purest late-Victorian gossamer: A wealthy widow (Alice Joyce) desperate to stop her young son (George J. Lewis) from marrying the daughter of a >>gasp!<< shopkeeper(!) becomes, inadvertently, involved with a thief (Jean Hersholt) posing as a Deacon who, unknown to her and her dizzy maid (Pitts) has plans to steal her art masterworks. (Got it?) Meanwhile… but you’re way ahead of me, or should be. 13 Washington Square is unusually complicated for a silent comedy, and more dependent on intertitles than any silent picture I can recall, suggesting that it probably should have been a talkie. Yet that would have robbed it of the pictorial beauty of John Stumar’s cinematography, half the reason for watching it. The other half is Pitts’ hilarious performance as the wide-eyed, malaprop-prone housemaid, whose solecisms would have made Archie Bunker proud… although a reliance on word-play in a silent movie says something about the material.

Alice Joyce may remind you, as she did me, of a shorter-haired Gillian Anderson, whom she strongly resembles, particularly in three-quarter profile.


James Stewart as “Buttons” the clown saves Charlton Heston’s life at the cost of his own freedom. And yes, that is Betty Hutton again, damn it.

The Greatest Show on Earth (1952) A typically overblown, fatuous and hilariously melodramatic piece of self-regard by Cecil B. DeMille that, as usual with that shameless purveyor of spectacle, also provides a hefty dose of genuine excitement. This is mainly confined to the aerial sequences with Cornel Wilde and Betty Hutton perpetually attempting to outdo each other on trapeze and high-wire and which are so successful they ultimately gave this acrophobe a tension headache. I mean that as a compliment. The picture is, essentially, a two-and-a-half hour, intermissionless advertisement for the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus, with a glowering Charlton Heston as the general manager trying to keep the show rolling amid professional rivalries, competing libidos and perennially simmering catfights. This is not to mention the presence in the center ring of a fugitive mercy-killer (James Stewart) disguised as a clown, a psychopathic elephant trainer (is there any other kind?), a thief in the employ of a big-time gangster and, for extra thrills, a climactic train-wreck that permits Hutton to prove her love to Heston. All popular movies are of course products of their time, and The Greatest Show on Earth depicts the 20th century love for trained-animal acts whose gradual phasing out has seemed to me for once a wholly admirable outcome of social agitation. Even as a child taken to his first and only circus I was uneasy about elephants, those most community-minded and sensitive of large land mammals, being made to dance around the ring, balance on balls and form pyramids for my entertainment; had I known with what sadistic cruelty these animals were trained, I suspect I would have been inclined to set a match to the sawdust. (I used secretly to wish the lions and tigers would gang up on and eviscerate their whip-wielding trainers, which I suppose tells you more about the limits of my personal benignity than I meant to.)

The movie periodically dwells, with dismaying Technicolor rapture, on crowds of all ages in the stands stuffing their faces with every imaginable comestible, from peanuts, popcorn and ice-cream cones to hot dogs, candy bars and cotton candy; it’s almost a pocket depiction of the expanding American waistline. Then there are the musical numbers, warbled either by Hutton or Dorothy Lamour, performed without amplification under enormous circus tents with brass bands blazing away and which in defiance of all the principles of sound reproduction we are expected to believe are perfectly audible to everyone in the crowd. And when the action flags, as it frequently does, we are treated to fleeting pipsqueak cameos by the likes of Arthur Q. Bryan‡, Bob Hope, Bing Crosby and even Bob Crosby in the audience, and all-too-brief three-ring bits by circus eminences such as Emmett Kelly as Weary Willie and Lou Jacobs, complete with tiny clown car; at least the young midget acrobat Cucciola gets a specialty number, although why he performs much of it in drag I leave to the psychologists in the audience. Somewhat astoundingly, it took four credited writers to concoct this sawdust mulligatawny, and I suspect there were also legions of uncredited scribes adding reams of DeMille-approved hokum. There are moments of amateurishness that defy credulity, as when DeMille cuts from two actors in front of a bad back-projection of monkeys clambering over an enclosure to the same pair closer to the camera while the rear-screen image exactly remains the same size. Still, it must be said that when one of the show’s principals falls from a great height, the action is achieved with shocking realism, and without a cut. DeMille himself narrates, with that patented sanctimonious/stentorian gasbaggery of his, made even more insufferable by the lines he speaks, which seem to imply that the Ringlings are closer to God than you or me and a lack of enthusiasm for their circus just might be subversive.

Billy Wilder got off one of the great back-handed compliments in movie history when after seeing the picture at the premiere he bowed to DeMille and proclaimed, “Mr. DeMille, you have made The Greatest Show on Earth.” Such are the ways of Hollywood, however, that, in the year of The Quiet Man, The Member of the Wedding, The Bad and the Beautiful, Come Back Little Sheba and Singin’ in the Rain, this was the Motion Picture Academy’s choice for “Best Picture.”


Ethel Waters, Bill Bailey (brother of Pearl) and Eddie “Rochester” Anderson

Cabin in the Sky (1943) Speaking of products of another time, this exceptionally tuneful musical fantasy preserves the work of a cast of black performers at the peak of their energy and ingenuity.


Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) Forty-three years have not withered, nor repeated custom entirely staled, the finite variety inherent in this highly enjoyable collaboration between George Lucas, Steven Spielberg and Lawrence Kasdan. Watching it again in the 4K UHD edition over the Memorial Day weekend I was struck by two things: That the first quarter of the picture is, as is so often the case with 4K transfers, entirely too dark, and that Karen Allen was and remains the most delightful heroine of a popular action picture in the past five decades. No one since has matched her combination of freckled beauty, spunky independence and amiable combativeness and I cannot imagine anyone, aside perhaps from the young Shirley MacLaine, negotiating the line between passionate determination and riant silliness as Allen does. That she did not become, after Raiders, one of the more important American actresses is one of those eternal mysteries, such as why Tom Cruise is still in any way relevant to life on the planet.


Airport (1970) When it comes to certain things in life, initial impressions made at an early age can, however undiscriminating they may seem to you later, carry through succeeding decades with very little change. This movie, first encountered on commercial television when I was 12, is one of those things.


*Actually, to generate those sorts of profits, even world-wide, I presume that Earthquake had many return customers. But what sort of person would want to see a thing like like twice? Even at age 13 I instinctively avoided seeing it once.

†A few other howlers in the long Tony Award history of nominating leading players in musicals as featured or supporting actor/actress, presumably based on billing: Isabel Bigley as Sarah Brown in Guys and Dolls; Yul Brynner in The King and I; Cyril Ritchard as Captain Hook and Mr. Darling in Peter Pan; Carol Lawrence as Maria in West Side Story (ditto Josie de Guzman in the 1980 edition); Sandra Church as Gypsy Rose Lee in Gypsy (the same thing happened to Zan Charisse and Christa Moore, respectively, in the 1975 and 1990 revivals); Theodor Bikel as Captain Von Trapp in The Sound of Music; Jerry Orbach as Sky Masterson in Guys & Dolls; Maureen Brennan as Cunegonde and Mark Baker (as Candide!) in the 1974 Candide; Patti LuPone in The Robber Bridegroom; David Kernan, Millicent Martin and Julia McKenzie, the entire singing cast of Side by Side by Sondheim; Lenny Baker, one of only four cast members in I Love My Wife; Alyson Reed as Sally Bowles(!) in the 1988 Cabaret; and, with Grimes as Molly Brown, the all-time jaw-droppers, Barbara Cook as Marian the librarian in The Music Man, Dick Van Dyke and Chita Rivera, the stars of the show, in Bye, Bye, Birdie and William Daniels in 1776. Daniels, quite rightly, refused the nomination.

‡The voice, if not the mind or spirit, of Elmer Fudd.

Text copyright 2024 by Scott Ross

Monthly Report: April 2024

Standard

By Scott Ross

As ever, click on the highlighted links for longer reviews &cet.

Aliens (1986) The Alien franchise is so well-established now and its horrific contours so much a part of the popular culture after nearly 45 years, it may be difficult to explain to younger people how striking Alien was to moviegoers in 1979. (When that thing burst out of John Hurt’s chest I had an attack of hyperventilation in the theater.) As much as one hates, and hated even then, to praise that appalling egotist and self-confessed plagiarist James Cameron,* his 1986 sequel had nearly as great an impact as Alien, at least on me. Cameron hasn’t anything like Ridley Scott’s contemplative qualities, nor his deliberate sense of pace; he grabs you by the throat early on and shakes you repeatedly, at strategically-placed intervals, making Alien look almost like an art-film by contrast. Of course, Cameron had the advantage over Scott in that he didn’t have to take time setting up the alien xenomorph or its violent, parasitic reproductive biology, and it cannot be denied that his action-movie approach is remarkably effective; I’ve seen Aliens on, first, video-tape and later, DVD and Blu-ray, more times than I can count since 1986 — I’m one of those suckers who can usually be counted on to purchase the new editions of certain favorite movies as they are released, even as I grumble about paying more than once for essentially the same item — and the picture gets to me every time, and in such a visceral manner my temperature rises before the encounter at the power station and remains elevated until after the end credits.

“Uh oh. I made a clean spot here. Now I’ve done it. Guess I’ll have to do the whole thing.”

The new 4K UHD edition looks spectacular and is not, as I had feared (and as is sometimes the case with 4K transfers) murkier than the original.


Poster art with a period flavor by Richard Amsel.

Little Miss Marker (1980) The fourth screen adaptation of the Damon Runyon story; it was filmed in 1934 with Adolphe Menjou and Shirley Temple, in 1949 as Sorrowful Jones starring Bob Hope and Lucille Ball, and in 1962 as 40 Pounds of Trouble with Tony Curtis, none of which I have seen. (My tolerance for both Temple and Menjou is nearly as low as Joe Biden’s for the First Amendment.) Engagingly written and cleverly directed by the formerly Blacklisted Walter Bernstein, the 1980 edition has a sunny quality that goes down like a glass of Cocomalt, with approximately as much nutritional value. Jennings Lang, who produced the picture with his star Walter Matthau, was a longtime producer at Universal and may have thought he had a Sting-like entertainment on his hands, with a cast of lovable 1930s rogues and the ante upped to include an adorable child. Matthau, I assume, as a degenerate gambler could not resist a comedy in which he plays a bookie and the backdrop is an illicit casino.

Runyon’s original is a curious little tale, bordered on the one side by comedy and on the other by a bathos that quickly drops into rank, manipulative sentimentality. Centered on the bookie Sorrowful Jones and the three or four-year-old girl left at his joint as a marker it’s essentially comic but takes a catastrophic turn at the end — the little girl dies — and none of the previous versions, as nearly as I can determine, has gone anywhere near Runyan’s deadly climax. (Two of them apparently end with either miraculous cures for the child or anyway the strong suggestion she will survive.) Bernstein, happily, avoids this complication, which in the story is unbearably maudlin, entirely. Where Runyan merely tells his readers that the girl’s presence in his single life alters the gruff, unlovable Sorrowful Jones to a more kindly, loving figure the writer-director shows us Jones thawing, slowly and not at all unbelievably, as he assumes responsibility for the child’s welfare and slowly stops seeing her as an impediment to be gotten rid of as quickly as possible. What makes this work is not merely Matthau’s peerless hangdog persona and his gift for subtle change but the girl herself; Sarah Stimson, whose only acting job this picture was, brings a calming presence to the situation. She isn’t precocious, or cutesy and there’s nothing calculating about either her performance or Bernstein’s conception of the character. She has a grave, polite mien, accepting what’s happening to her, never questioning her faith that her father (Andrew Rubin) will come back for her and unintimidated by Jones’ perennial irascibility.

Bernstein adds plot wrinkles in the persona (not in the story) of the dumber-than-he-thinks-he-is gangster played by Tony Curtis and the woman (Julie Andrews) whose ancestral home he is turning into his casino and who, it will hardly surprise you to learn, attaches herself to “The Kid” and to Jones. Bernstein also turns Regret, a minor character in the Runyon story, into Sorrowful Jones’ bookie-joint manager who, in the single bit of miscasting in the movie, is played by Bob Newhart. Newhart’s essential character, the stammering low-key voice of, if not reason, at least stability, is all wrong for Runyon. Curtis and Matthau are much better suited to his style, as are Brian Dennehy as Curtis’ chief goon and, in smaller roles, Tom Pedi, Joshua Shelley and Kenneth McMillan as that perpetual oxymoron, a decent cop, albeit one who, if he succeeds in his aim of protecting the little girl, will ensure her misery by having her placed in an orphan asylum. Where Bernstein goes slightly awry, as far as stylistic integrity is concerned, is in the women’s roles, which seem to have drifted in from the work of another author. Andrews is appealing as she nearly always is, and Lee Grant gives a good reading of the gently exasperated judge at the climax but neither feels to me like an organic Runyon character.

Philip H. Lathrop’s photography is colorful and clear, Henry Mancini score consists largely of lively pastiches of 1930s music and Wayne Fitzgerald and David Oliver Pfeil designed the charming main title sequence featuring period wheeled children’s toys including, in a winking cameo, Fontaine Fox’s Toonerville Trolley.


Early Al Hirschfeld poster art, in which Ollie resembles a fat Clark Gable.

Pardon Us (1931) Laurel and Hardy’s first feature, a spoof of the early talkie The Big House, was intended as a short subject and it feels padded out, with long, dry and mostly unfunny stretches and one appalling sequence in which the boys, after escaping from prison, hide out in a black sharecroppers’ enclave. The black performers surrounding Stan and Ollie are neither more nor less stereotyped than in other movies of the time (although as usual they are happy laborers, singing spirituals during work and more secular fare after); what’s really insulting is that we’re asked to believe they’re so simple they can’t spot in their midst two white men in obvious minstrel-show blackface complete with exaggerated lips. The casual racism is even more of a shame because it detracts from our enjoying Hardy’s beautiful tenor in the communal sequence. (Speaking of music: When a prison quintet played by The Avalon Boys sings in the exercise yard, their a cappella number is an uncredited “I Want To Go Back To Michigan,” the 1914 ballad by Irving Berlin later memorably performed by Judy Garland in Easter Parade.)

The occasional funny bits involve Stan’s speech impediment, caused by a dental problem, which makes it sound as if he’s blowing raspberries at tough cons like Walter Long and Wilfred Lucas’ psychotic Warden, the schoolroom sequence featuring James Finlayson as a lunatic pedagogue and a scene in the prison dental clinic where (naturally) it’s Ollie’s healthy tooth that gets pulled. The dialogue is credited to L & H’s usual scenarist of the period H.M. Walker, the team’s frequent shorts director James Parrott staged it (often poorly and in so enervated a manner than its 55-minute running-time feels like two hours) and the uncredited gag-men include Parrot, Charley Rogers and, as usual, Stan. Those who grew up on Our Gang comedies (called The Little Rascals on television) will recognize the music in the score, comprised of stock-music composed by Leroy Shield used by Hal Roach in both L & H and Our Gang short subjects.


Those Calloways (1964) If Paul Annixter’s 1950 coming-of-age novel Swiftwater did not exist, this Disney conservationist epic might suffice, but the adaptation by Louis Pelletier softens, complicates or reverses nearly everything that made Annisxter’s beautifully written book enthralling, and refreshingly candid.


Blind Date (1987) The screenwriter Dale Launer’s 1980s specialty was a certain witty nastiness with a marshmallow center: Ruthless People, Dirty Rotten Scoundrels and this exercise in comedic mayhem, directed by Blake Edwards and featuring the first starring movie performance by Bruce Willis. The way to enjoy the picture is to accept that nothing about it is related in any way to reality; once you realize that it takes place in an invented comic universe where a young woman can get insanely drunk and destructive on a single half-glass of champagne, a maniac lawyer can smash up several businesses without charge and, later, represent a client in front of a judge who it turns out is his father you may relax and perhaps, as I did, get a lot of laughs from it. Although Edwards was not, at least officially, the writer, Blind Date feels like a Blake Edwards picture, especially in the elaborate last third, and there are wonderful surprises for those paying attention, as when during a wedding ceremony the judge played with dyspeptic irritation by William Daniels snarls at his butler to shoot his incessantly barking Doberman and, a couple of minutes later, we hear a distant gunshot, which goes unnoticed by the guests, and uncommented on. The surprise of the delayed effect is as large as our hilarity at the filmmakers’ audacity.


King of Hearts (Le Roi de cœur) (1966) The captivating Philippe de Broca war-fable starring Alan Bates, given a glorious restoration in 2018 by Cohen Media Group.


Jean Seberg looks spooked, perhaps understandably.

Paint Your Wagon (1969) There was probably no way, at the time of its release, for this Lerner and Loewe musical about the 1849 California gold rush to get a fair evaluation because everyone knew how much was spent on it; budgeted at $10 million it eventually cost the struggling Paramount Pictures twice that, at a time when a million dollars was actual money. The critics were aware of the cost overruns, and of the protracted Oregon shooting schedule — of the general spectacle of American movie studios hurling good money after bad, in obscene amounts, for ever more bloated musicals, few of which made a profit and even fewer of which (Oliver!, Funny Girl, Darling Lili, On a Clear Day You Can See Forever, Sweet Charity) were any good. In the case of Paint Your Wagon, the manic-depressive Joshua Logan was stuck for months in the literal wilderness, with a cast of hundreds and a makeshift Western town he first had to build, then destroy in a spectacular fashion. He was also saddled with a producer who was not only the show’s lyricist and author of the Broadway book but the man with whom he had made another disastrous adaptation (Camelot) two years earlier and who, after entrusting Paddy Chayefsky to put together a new, hipper, screenplay, one involving a (heterosexual) ménage à trois, which he then (out of jealousy? insecurity? sheer perversity?) rewrote himself, to its diminution. Both Lee Marvin and Clint Eastwood signed up on the basis of the Chayefsky screenplay and both were astounded to find much of what they had loved removed by Lerner’s fine Italian hand. (Chayefsky retained an “adaptation” credit but the screenplay itself is credited solely to Lerner.) Marvin gave up The Wild Bunch for this, so one can only imagine his reaction to the new lines that were filmed, although I hasten to add that you can detect Chayefsky’s unique way with a monologue, especially a rhetorical one, in several of the speeches that remain in the movie: Jean Seberg’s wedding-night monologue is one, and Marvin’s “let’s all be married” speech at the end of the first act is another.

Those names are worth pondering: Lee Marvin. Clint Eastwood. Jean Seberg. Stars who didn’t sing, in a big-budget musical. That was the madness abroad in the land in those days, when the likes of Richard Harris and Vanessa Redgrave were routinely called upon to carry a musical. Eastwood, at least, could more or less carry a tune, and had an appealing, unemphatic, slightly jazz-flavored way with a lyric. Marvin got, of all things, a Top 10 European hit out his melancholy, whiskey-laced rendition of “Wand’rin’ Star.” Eastwood had to strain too much in the higher registers for his “I Talk to the Trees” to land as sweetly as it should have, but he did rather well by “I Still See Elisa” and, especially, “Gold Fever,” one of several new songs on which Lerner collaborated with André Previn, whom he did his best to drive insane. (Speaking of not knowing when to quit: Previn then allowed himself to be driven even madder writing songs with Lerner for the Broadway musical Coco starring yet another non-singer, Katharine Hepburn. What an era. No wonder Hair seemed so fresh to people then.) Seberg was dubbed, by Anita Gordon, on her single number, the evocative, Previn-composed “A Million Miles Away Behind the Door” which contains one of my two favorite song lyrics: There’s so much space between the waiting heart and whispered word/It’s never heard.† Harve Presnell is, thankfully, on hand to sing a hair-raising version of “They Call the Wind Maria” (Pauline Kael: “Where did he come from?”) and I have always like Nelson Riddle’s orchestrations of the songs, except for the one we hear when Marvin sings “The First Thing You Know” and which feels like a last-minute demand from someone to “make it sound more like a musical-comedy song!” The banjo-and-harmonica arrangement on the soundtrack album is much simpler, and more relaxed. I assume Riddle preferred it.

An unlikely pop hit, at least in Europe. Marvin never tired of twitting his teenage son that it was he who knocked the Beatles out of the top spot on the charts.

Lerner can, I suppose, be excused to a degree on the grounds that he was being given daily injections of “vitamins” by the notorious Max Jacobson, put up in Oregon at Paramount expense, and was probably not in complete possession of his mind. Logan later revealed the extent of his own manic-depression, and, again, one supposes he couldn’t help making a mess of things. But where was everyone else? The wonder is that anything entertaining came out of it, yet the movie is much more enjoyable than it had a right to be, Ray Walton’s appalling performance notwithstanding. William A. Fraker’s cinematography was roundly condemned at the time of the picture’s release for being as muddy as the streets of “No-Name City,” but on the recent Kino Blu-ray, looks awfully good. (The 4K disc emphasizes the mud. Why is it so hard to get these color balances correct?) Superfluous side-note: I’ve always been amused that someone — Chayefsky, possibly — plunked Horace Tabor down in No-Name City, in the person of William O’Connell, complete with prince-nez and fastidious Boston Brahman accent. Tabor, the noted Leadville, Colorado silver miner and magnate, became one of the three principals in another musical piece, the Douglas Moore/John LaTouche opera The Ballad of Baby Doe, but wasn’t in the West in 1849, and if he had been, would have been all of 18 or 19.

I used to refer to Paint Your Wagon as a guilty-pleasure. I no longer do. The phrase is not in my personal vocabulary now. If a picture provides enough basic entertainment, relatively brightly, with some talent expressed behind the camera and in front of it, and doesn’t embarrass you or insult your intelligence while you’re watching, it isn’t “guilty” anything; God knows there are enough truly shitty movies out there that don’t even give you the modicum amount of those criteria, and they routinely make millions.


Stranger at My Door (1956) An interesting little B-Western with pretentions that, despite the way it pushes its conventional Christian piety, has the virtues of an intelligent script, vivid acting, accomplished direction and photography, and brevity; at 85 minutes, it is no shorter nor longer than it should be. A bank-robber on the run from the law (Skip Homeier) hides out with the family of a frontier minister (Macdonald Carey) who sees in him a project for redemption. The preacher has a young son (Stephen Wootton) and a newish wife (Patricia Medina) the outlaw tries to get around by claiming she isn’t cut out to be a minister’s spouse, and he reads her rather well at that: Medina seems more dance-hall floozie than pious churchwoman, and the camera is as fascinated with her bust as Homeier’s outlaw is.‡ Although Barry Shipman’s dialogue is occasionally a bit on the nose, it’s often remarkably honest even while pushing that Judeo-Christian through-line rather insistently. William Witney’s direction, like Bud Thackery’s black-and-white cinematography, is sharp and clean, and the cast seizes its opportunities without recourse to overdoing things. There are, however, some moments of bad back-projection that betray the picture’s budget limitations, and when the little boy’s dog is injured, the child pretty obviously rescues a stuffed animal, and a stiff one at that.

A secondary redemption narrative involves the seemingly mad horse sold to the minister by Slim Pickens (that’ll teach him) and it’s here that the picture soars off into realms of surrealist imagery as the horse fixes its ire first on one character (or animal; the dog also comes in for some menacing) and then another. How this horse was trained to perform as it does, and as convincingly, is one of the great mysteries of the Hollywood past, but you’ll seldom see a more terrifying specter in a Western than this violently-inclined equine maniac.


Gambit (1966) Beginning with the unexpected success of the blacklisted American writer-director Jules Dassin’s Rififi and 1955, and accelerating steadily after the Peter Stone/Stanley Donen Charade in 1963, there was an explosion of caper-thrillers and comedies, many but by no means all composed of a single intriguing word (the original French title for Rififi was Du rififi chez les hommes): Everything from, on the higher end, The Pink Panther, Arabesque, Mirage, Kaleidoscope, How to Steal a Million, Who’s Minding the Mint? and Hot Millions to Topkapi and Ocean’s Eleven in the middle, to, in the dregs, Assault on a Queen, The Italian Job and Caprice. Gambit placed near the end of the original cycle and while it was modestly budgeted — except for a few fleeting glimpses of Hong Kong, most of it was shot at Universal Studios (or, in one hilarious case, Santa Barbara subbing for the Riviera) — didn’t make much money anyway. Too bad, because the picture, charmingly written by Jack Davies and (of all people) Alvin Sargent, expertly directed by Ronald Neame and winningly played out by Michael Caine, Shirley MacLaine and Herbert Lom, is consistently appealing. The posters suggested to contemporary ticket-buyers that it was okay to give away the ending, but not the beginning, and it’s in that 26-minute stretch that I most detect the hand of the story’s originator, Sidney Carroll, author of, in the comic Western A Big Hand for the Little Lady, perhaps the most satisfying surprise ending I’ve ever seen.

The then-98 year old Neame in his commentary on the Kino Lorber Blu-ray says it was MacLaine who suggested her character remain silent throughout the extended phony-opening, which is in keeping with what one hears about her instincts and intelligence as an actress, although as she plays an Amerasian dance-hall girl, the entire enterprise would doubtless be considered intolerably racist today, as would the casting of Lom as a Middle Eastern millionaire, although for my part I don’t think I’ve never seen this wonderful character actor look more strikingly handsome than he does here. Speaking of commentaries: Avoid the second set on the Kino disc, by three nonentities who show off their collective ignorance by repeatedly confusing Sargent with Arthur Laurents, alleging first that he wrote the Gambit script for MacLaine, which Neame in no way corroborates and second that Sargent (not Laurents) did the same with The Turning Point… which was not only not written for MacLaine but was also not written by Sargent. Continuing on this weird tract the three movie stooges on the commentary further declare, with the confidence of the ignoramus whose thought process is entirely unclouded by fact, that Sargent also wrote Laurents’ The Way We Were! Needless to say after that, I did not follow these roaring fools any further.

Among the myriad pleasures Gambit offers are the comic interplay between the proletarian MacLaine and the phlegmatic Caine, the surprisingly winning score by the highly variable Maurice Jarre and the expert lighting and widescreen cinematography by Clifford Stine, of which I have appended a representative sample above, a small masterpiece of character contrast.


*For The Terminator, Cameron cynically plagiarized elements (particularly the opening) from Harlan Ellison’s short story “Soldier from Tomorrow” and from Ellison’s own adaptation of it, as “Soldier,” as a 1964 episode of “The Outer Limits.” He even said to a friend of Ellison’s who asked where the plot came from, “Oh, I ripped off a couple of Harlan Ellison stories.”

†My other favorite, from “Skylark,” lyric by Johnny Mercer: Faint as a will-o-the-wisp/Crazy as a loon/Sad as a gypsy serenading the moon... although I suppose we’re not allowed to sing that one any longer.

‡It says something about this performer, formerly a child actor, that when he achieved his majority he had his name legally changed from “Skippy” to “Skip.” That’s progress, I suppose, of a sort.

Text copyright 2024 by Scott Ross

(Belated) Bi-Monthly Report: August and September 2023

Standard

By Scott Ross

Blocks come to all writers if they live long enough. Mine began in 2004; it is with me still. Usually, and despite chronic major depression, I manage to work around it, when the need to express myself is at least as great as the forces working against that expression. Sometimes the block gets the upper hand. The last three months or so it has been in the ascendency, most likely exacerbated first by an antidepressant medication that seemed to me to be doing me no good and, possibly, a degree of harm and second by an unusually heavy and long-lived load of seasonal allergens in this part of the world.

Further, deponent sayeth not.


August

Stay Hungry (1976) An amiable and often very funny comic drama adapted from Charles Gaines’ novel by Gaines and the director Bob Rafelson set in and around the body-building culture in Birmingham, Alabama. Like the Hal Ashby-directed The Landlord (1970) the movie focuses on a wealthy, dissolute young man involved with a collection of oddballs, and in both pictures the youth is played by a Bridges. In The Landlord the young wastrel was the talented Beau, in Stay Hungry Jeff, the best young film actor of his generation. As the new owner of a small, struggling downtown gymnasium whose secret weapon is an aspiring Mr. Universe contestant Bridges displays that good-natured, open quality that has been his agreeable specialty pretty much from the start. As the object of his romantic interest, Sally Field makes plain that while she was not getting the roles she might have she had been working toward them, and it is no accident that “Sybil” awaited her on television, and Norma Rae on film. The biggest surprise of Stay Hungry, however, and its greatest pleasure, is the performance by Arnold Schwarzenegger as the Mr. Universe aspirant. If you know him only from the later, more famous, roles in which he exhibited an unpleasant belligerence that was matched only by his seeming invincibility, you won’t be prepared for how genial he is here, nor how sweet. (I missed this picture when it opened in 1976 but did catch the dopey live-action Road Runner cartoon The Villain three years later, and “sweet” was exactly the word for his performance in that one too.)

The movie is filled with eccentrics, and they’re well cast, with R. G. Armstrong as the gym’s sexually insatiable owner, Robert Englund and Roger E. Mosley as his slightly wacked-out employees, Woodrow Parfrey as Bridges’ gently cynical uncle, Scatman Crothers as the disappointed family retainer, Fannie Flagg as a prattling socialite, Joe Spinell as a good-natured goon, and Helena Kallianiotes, Kathleen Miller, Joanna Cassidy and Ed Begley Jr. filling in the remaining assortment of kooks and local color. Stay Hungry plays a bit like an impoverished Robert Altman picture, and although it takes an unexpected and ugly turn near the end when Armstrong goes bananas and presumably rapes Field — the filmmaking is ambiguous on that point — the movie is, generally, lighter on its feet than was the usual case for pictures of its type, especially coming from Bob Rafelson, whose work tends to have very little air in it. Victor J. Kemper’s sunny, dappled cinematography also makes it exceptionally good-looking.

I’m not sure what it all added up to, but I certainly had a good time watching it unfold.


Clint Eastwood offers a last smoke to Aldo Giuffrè’s dying soldier.

The Good, The Bad and the Ugly (1966) The 4K UHD edition from Kino Lorber of this perennial favorite is mouth-watering, and as with Rio Bravo and the 1973 The Iceman Cometh, I am always amazed when watching it just how swiftly a very long movie can unreel when the people who made it know their business.


The Goddess (1958) Paddy Chayefsky’s slightly fictionalized portrait of Marilyn Monroe (he even offered Monroe the role, which she gave serious thought to taking) is less than the sum of its considerable parts but worth seeing for the screenwriter’s rich, plummy dialogue, and for the performances, particularly that of Kim Stanley in the leading role. Although Stanley is physically wrong for it — the polite word for her facial features would I think be “unprepossessing,” and it’s impossible to imagine her becoming a screen sex-symbol, at least in America — she gets the emptiness of goddess’ inner life, and the hysteria encased within her lonely and essential despair. There’s a sequence early on, in which she’s playing the character as a movie-besotted teenage girl and delivering a monologue about her desires, where the 32-year-old actress guilelessly (and rather astonishingly) transforms herself, fully and believably, into a 16-year-old.

Lloyd Bridges plays the DiMaggio figure, and he’s more impressive than you might imagine. Steven Hill as the Arthur Miller surrogate is more than that, as is Betty Lou Holland as the girl’s first astonishingly selfish, then religiously obsessed mother. Patty Duke plays the goddess as a young girl, Elizabeth Wilson is wonderfully steely as her protective (possibly Lesbian) secretary and Werner Klemperer gets a nice turn as a “Supposed Old and Dear Friend,” as he identified, who doesn’t really know the woman. Arthur J. Ornitz’s black-and-white photography is beautiful, sharp and evocative, and the musical score by Virgil Thompson is far more sensitive than is the norm for dramas of its period.

John Cromwell, a good journeyman filmmaker, directed intelligently and efficiently if with no particular pictorial distinction. Chayefsky only once had a really great director (well, twice if we include Ken Russell’s wild, funny version of Altered States, which the screenwriter somewhat unaccountably took his name off). Arthur Hiller did all right by The Americanization of Emily and The Hospital, but “all right” doesn’t seem nearly enough for a writer with the dramatic/rhetorical gifts of a Paddy Chayefsky. Only with Network, directed by Sidney Lumet, do we get a Chayefsky picture whose saturated, almost documentary visual style perfectly sets off and contrasts with the rococo extravagance of the words being spoken in it.


Black Sunday (1977) The new Arrow Blu-ray of this taut, occasionally dazzling thriller based on Thomas Harris’ debut novel beautifully reproduces John A. Alonzo’s sumptuous widescreen photography and retains the picture’s slight aura of bittersweet nostalgia, at least in this viewer, for a time in American studio movies when intelligence mattered as much as expensive special effects and high-concept action sequences.


No shot like this, of both Pacino and DeNiro in the frame at the same time, appears in Heat.

Heat (1995) The 4K UHD edition of Michael Mann’s nonpareil policier looks splendid, and watching it gives me the opportunity to offer an observation I’d meant to make before concerning this procedural masterpiece: Has anyone else noticed that in the otherwise effective and superbly written diner meeting between Al Pacino and Robert De Niro there is not within the scene a single shot of the two together? But for the fact that the restaurant was real and Mann had only a few hours on a single night between its closing and opening hours to get the sequence, the actors might have been filmed at different times, for all we can tell from the images and the editing. Why bring two powerhouses like Pacino and DeNiro together and then only shoot them separately?


Holiday Inn (1942; 4K UHD) Like the later (and lesser) Blue Skies, this Irving Berlin song-fest pits a singer (Bing Crosby) against his dancer rival (Fred Astaire) for the affections of an aspiring young performer (Marjorie Reynolds) and as with Blue Skies, Bing is the nice guy and Fred the amoral cad who will stoop to any deceit to get what he wants. It’s not how anyone who loved Astaire on the screen wanted to see him, and I wonder why the studios (or anyway Berlin, whose original “stories” these were) kept forcing it on the most gifted performer the movie musical ever had.* It almost presents itself as a hostile gesture toward him. Was Berlin in some way jealous of his star?

That said, the picture is engaging and smartly directed by Astaire’s old RKO compatriot Mark Sandrich from an amusing screenplay by Claude Binyon. (The playwright Elmer Rice is credited with the “adaptation,” whatever that means. I smell a Writer’s Guild arbitration afoot.) The choreography by David Abel is at least a step up from the dances in Blue Skies, and Fred works in a real humdinger in “Say it with Firecrackers,” an unusually boring Berlin melody saved by Astaire’s literally explosive routine. Nothing, however, can salvage Crosby’s blackface tribute number to Abraham Lincoln, which even in 1942 must have set race relations back 50 years.

This, by the way, is the picture that introduced “White Christmas,” and Crosby’s wistful/regretful vocal reprise of it, staged on an empty Hollywood studio set, probably helped sell not merely the movie but the 50 million copies of the record that supplemented it. Der Bingle also gets a nice ballad in “Be Careful, It’s My Heart” and Astaire’s “You’re Easy to Dance With” is a highlight as well. Their challenge duet “I’ll Capture Your Heart Singing (Dancing)” is pleasing and indeed the picture itself goes down easily, despite the dumb plot and that awful “Abraham” bit. (Berlin almost redeems himself with a nifty couplet in Crosby’s song “Lazy” which runs, “With a great big valise full/Of books to read where it’s peaceful.” I don’t think any other American songwriter ever rhymed “peaceful” with “valise full,” or in any case did it so charmingly.)

The recent 4K UHD restoration is attractive.

*Although, come to think of it, Astaire himself was to blame for another one, Second Chorus, for which he was also one of the producers and which he later deemed his own worst picture.


Twilight (1998) Robert Benton and Richard Russo’s engaging Valentine to the classic private-eye picture, with wonderful work by its cast, especially Paul Newman, Gene Hackman, Susan Sarandon, James Garner and Liev Schreiber.


September

Will Penny (1967) Much to my own surprise (and half of growth after all is the capacity for surprising oneself) I have happily spent the last few weeks reading Charlton Heston’s book The Actor’s Life: Journals, 1956-1976 and savoring his sharp, terse descriptions of his experiences making movies. I was compelled to sit down with the book after seeing the recent, beautiful Kino Blu-ray release of this, Heston’s own favorite among his pictures and one of the finest Westerns ever made. His performance as Will ranks with the great acting jobs in Westerns — with Henry Fonda in My Darling Clementine, John Wayne in She Wore a Yellow Ribbon and The Searchers, James Stewart in Winchester ’73 and The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, Robert Ryan in Day of the Outlaw and Walter Brennan in Bad Day at Black Rock. It suggests that a man I had, until first seeing Will Penny, never imagined could be a great movie actor might, with enough good roles like this, have stretched into one. Alas, on film (as perhaps opposed to the stage, to which he returned more often than most of us knew and about which he appears to have been passionate) he seldom got the chance.


Midnight Run (1988; 4K UHD) Speaking of surprises, this was one of the most pleasant of its year. Perhaps the most enjoyable variation on the “buddy” movie template since The Sting, the picture pits Robert DeNiro’s laconic bounty hunter against not only the quixotic embezzler (Charles Grodin) he’s been tasked with bringing in but the mob the CPA has betrayed, the FBI which is also after him, a rival bounty hunter (John Ashton) and, although he doesn’t realize it until too late, the bail-bondsman (Joe Pantoliano) who put him on the scent to begin with. It sounds perhaps more complicated than it is. Written with wit and intelligence by George Gallo and directed with assurance by Martin Brest, the picture not only delivers enormous pleasure at regular intervals, it takes time out for incisive dialogue, character development that does not embarrass the actors or test the patience of the viewer, and offers, in Grodin’s wry, funny performance, the best role this gifted comedian had after Heaven Can Wait 10 years earlier.

Donald E. Thorin’s muted cinematography looked good in 1988; in the recent 4K UHD edition it’s spectacular. Danny Elfman’s blues-based score is brief but effective and there is a marvelous supporting cast which includes Yaphet Kotto as a dyspeptic FBI agent, Dennis Farina as a mob boss and Jack Kehoe as a wormy turncoat.


Flying Down to Rio (1933) Remembered chiefly as the first picture in which Fred Astaire danced with Ginger Rogers. This happens in a silly but infectious number called the “Carioca,” which among other things involves the partners pressing their foreheads together. Somehow Fred and Ginger carried off that indignity with enough panache that movie audiences of 1933 demanded more of them, and you can see why; their joy in performing together was obvious. (Of course, having spent his entire performing life partnered with his sister Adele, recently retired to England, Fred was most definitely not in the mood to be yoked again to another dancer. After The Gay Divorcee in 1934 became one of the biggest hits of its year, however, the matter was effectively out of his hands.)

While the plot, based on an unpublished comedy by the playwright and lyricist Anne Caldwell,* is perfunctory, the leads, Dolores del Río and Gene Raymond, are engaging, and the picture has a nifty gimmick: Scenes of Brazilian life that, through the creative use of the optical printer, become living picture-postcards, each flipping past to reveal the next. There is also, in Fred’s enthusiastic title number, a shocking moment (presumably the work of the movie’s producer, Merian C. Cooper, the begettor of King Kong) when during an aerial routine a young woman falls screaming from a trapeze below a biplane. She’s rescued, of course, but it’s an electrifying bit, and I wonder if George Roy Hill and William Goldman had it in mind when they made The Great Waldo Pepper 40 years later. As Arlene Croce wrote in The Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers Book, “Merian C. Cooper brought terror to the movie musical.”

The songs, which include a very likeable solo number for Ginger called “Music Makes Me,” were by Vincent Youmans, with spritely lyrics by Gus Kahn and Edward Eliscu. Flying Down to Rio is also notable for pairing two incomparable comic sissies, Franklin Pangborn and Eric Blore, as a hotel manager and his simpering assistant. Blore would come into full flower, as it were, in his later Astaire & Rogers appearances.

*Caldwell, one of the most prolific librettists of her time, frequently collaborated with Jerome Kern. Together the pair wrote one of the most charming numbers heard in a stage musical (She’s a Good Fellow, 1919) of the early 20th century, “The Bullfrog Patrol.” This delightful harmonized duet, originally performed by the Duncan Sisters, virtually defines what the Germans mean by the term Ohrwurm, which we translate as “earworm.” Caldwell is virtually forgotten today, but my hat is off to a lyricist who could write a line like, “I wish that Bolsheviki froggy-dog would croak!” I realize the song is written (and composed) in a minstrel form, which today puts it, I suppose, automatically beyond the… er… pale… but listening to Jeanne Lehman and Rebecca Luker’s 1992 version of it always gives me enormous pleasure.


Early Hirschfeld MGM poster art.

Bonnie Scotland (1935) Not one of Laurel and Hardy’s very best features, despite the seven credited writers involved, including Chaplin’s old collaborator Albert Austin and Stan himself. (How many more went without a credit?) Stan was also, with Hal Roach, one of the producers, so he comes in for the lion’s share of both the credit and the blame. The worst aspect of the picture is the superfluous love story involving June Lang and William Janney, although Janney is rather fascinating in a gruesome sort of way. It’s almost two short pictures pressed uncertainly together: In the first, Stan and Ollie come to Scotland to (they think) collect Stan’s share of the MacLaurel fortune. In the second they accidentally sign up with a Scottish regiment of the British Army and end up in India and pitted against both their dour commanding officer (James Finlayson) and a local belligerent (Maurice Black) bent on the regiment’s destruction. From a post-war, anti-imperialist perspective, the white-man’s-burden aspect of the movie sits a little uneasily today, especially considering the genuine horrors inflicted on Indians by the British Raj. And while the finale is a direct steal from the hilarious 1927 silent With Love and Hisses, the first “official” Laurel and Hardy short, there are, as usual with L & H, several very funny bits, especially an extended sequence in a rooming house involving a frying fish, Ollie’s trousers, a hot cook-stove and a termagant Scots landlady.

James W. Horne directed, but really, you don’t care who directs Laurel and Hardy, do you?


The Enforcer (1951) Humphrey Bogart’s last picture at Warner Bros. is a largely splendid depiction of a crusading D.A. (Bogart, of course) based on the real-life Burton Turkus, the prosecutor of several members of Murder, Inc. The movie, intelligently written by Martin Rackin and beautifully photographed by Robert Burks, is a solid crime-drama, enacted by a terrific cast which aside from Bogey includes Ted de Corsia, Everett Sloane, Michael Tolan, King Donovan, Bob Steele, Adelaide Klein, Don Beddoe, Tito Vuolo, Patricia Joiner and, in a demanding role, a pre-Blacklist Zero Mostel. There is, however, a moment in which Bogart threatens a woman and her child with jail for her and institutional slow-death for the boy unless she coughs up the information he wants that is absolutely bone-chilling. I’m sure at the time it was seen as morally defensible but you would be forgiven for finding it a sick-making justification of, as Eliot M. Camarena noted, “Might makes right.”

Raoul Walsh was an uncredited director on The Enforcer, and was said to have overseen most of the picture including the finale and all of its suspenseful moments, after the credited filmmaker, Bretaigne Windust, fell ill early in the filming. Yet Wikipedia assures me this is “A film by [emphasis mine] Bretaigne Windust.” I realize it’s far too late to strangle unthinking auteurism in its cradle, but can’t we apply a little elder-assisting euthanasia to the problem?


The Absent-Minded Professor (1961) A likable comic fantasy from Walt Disney with a relaxed, pleasant titular performance by Fred MacMurray and some very good special effects overseen by the (as-usual) uncredited Ub Iwerks. This is the first of Disney’s comedies to be set at and around the fictional Medfield College, the later stomping ground of Kurt Russell in the “Dexter Reilly” pictures. Bill Walsh’s screenplay works to a formula for these things, one I suppose was begun with The Shaggy Dog in 1959 (which was co-written by Walsh) wherein something fantastic — transformation by a teenage boy into a canine in the previous movie, the accidental creation of a substance MacMaurray’s character calls flubber here — leads to comic complications and a fair amount of slapstick before the inevitable happy ending. The nonsense is carried out with genial flair, nicely directed by Robert Stevenson and amusingly acted by a cast of old pros including Nancy Olsen, Keenan Wynn, Leon Ames, Edward Andrews, Belle Montrose, Alan Carney, Forrest Lewis, James Westerfield, Gage Clarke and Alan Hewitt. (The young pro in the cast is Tommy Kirk.) Only Eliot Reid, as MacMurray’s stuffy academic rival for Olsen’s hand, is truly bad, alternately nasty and hysterical. Thankfully, however, he is more than balanced by Ed Wynn who shows up, hilariously for those who know his radio history, as the Medfield Fire Chief. Equally impressive in his own small way is “Charlie,” the professor’s appealing little bearded collie mutt.


Son of Flubber (1963) At the time, a rare Disney sequel — Walt disliked returning to where he’d already been; he should have only lived to see what the company bearing his name has gotten up to in the last few years when that is all they do. Most of the Absent-Minded Professor cast returned for this one although some, like Ed Wynn, play different characters, and like its predecessor it was directed by Robert Stevenson and co-written by Bill Walsh (with Don DaGradi, who with this picture became Walsh’s permanent writing partner). It’s less inspired than the previous movie and feels entirely unnecessary, but it has some nice moments, the best of which is the sequence early on with the IRS agent played by Bob Sweeney where he patiently explains to the recently-wed MacMurray and Olsen that they owe thousands in taxes for money they’ve yet to receive from the government. Olsen’s role here in even more thankless than in The Absent-Minded Professor, and the character’s actions feel less justified than merely petulant, and (alas) Eliot Reid is back as her jilted suitor. Fortunately, the real comedians in the cast deliver. These include Keenan Wynn, Tommy Kirk, Leon Ames, Ken Murray, Alan Hewitt, Joe Flynn, William Demarest, Jack Albertson, Joanna Moore as a femme fatale, and, reprising their roles in the previous picture, Edward Andrews, James Westerfield, Alan Carney and Forrest Lewis. Paul Lynde has a showy, funny role as (hold onto your hats) a sportscaster, the delightful Charlie Ruggles appears at the climax as a judge and Ed Wynn gives an utterly charming performance during the trial as a surprising “surprise witness.” Little Charlie the mutt also returns, and you have to admire his patience in being forced to act under an indoor rainstorm.


Prometheus (2012; 4K UHD) Ridley Scott, the director of the 1979 Alien, also made this exciting, visually impressive variation. (I refuse on principal to use the barbarous neologism “prequel” to describe anything.) Scott had long talked about returning to the original derelict spacecraft explored by John Hurt and company in the first picture to discover who the enormous “space jockey” was, and how he got there, and Prometheus was apparently intended as the first installment of at least three. Unfortunately, a fatal miscalculation in the second (see below) derailed that project before it could be fully developed, and this is an especial shame because no one was better positioned to do it than Scott, and none of the directors of the Alien sequels had his extraordinary eye.

(I find Scott’s arrogance nearly as hard to take as James Cameron’s, as for example when on the Prometheus commentary he never once mentions the names of the movie’s writers. I also, however, recognize his talent as a director: A Ridley Scott movie may be vacuous, but it always looks great. Jon Spaihts wrote the original screenplay, and Damon Lindelof completed the polish. Each in his separate commentary on the Prometheus home video acknowledges the contributions of the other, and especially that of Ridley Scott, who could learn a thing or two about graciousness and humility from his apparently unmentionable writers.)

The picture is ingeniously plotted, and occasionally shocking, as when the character played by Noomi Rapace, realizing she has been impregnated with an alien form, undergoes an excruciating, self-directed robo-operation to remove the thing from her middle before it kills her. Michael Fassbender as the synthetic David is a revelation, Charlize Theron does wonders with her small but pivotal role and Idris Elba is marvelous as the ship captain. Guy Pearce’s appearance as the ancient corporate patriarch Peter Weyland is puzzling unless you know that the sequences of him as a younger man were cut by 20th Century-Fox before the movie’s release. Someone also cut Theron’s best line, a riposte to her father, presumably to tamp down the bitterness of the scene… which is, I submit, what the scene is about. Dariusz Wolski’s cinematography is often breathtaking, and there is as well a good atmospheric score by Marc Streitenfeld, although his compositions are effectively dwarfed by the interpolation of a beautiful theme by Harry Gregson-Williams and Jerry Goldsmith’s original from Alien. The 4K UHD edition is striking.


Alien Covenant (2017; 4K UHD) Although this follow-up to Prometheus is admittedly more suspenseful and viscerally exciting throughout than its predecessor, it’s undone by a truly nasty and disturbing climax, one which I imagine through audience word-of-mouth likely sunk the movie at the box-office; it was the first Alien picture that failed to show a profit. This is unfortunate because the narrative Ridley Scott envisaged for his new series had not yet gotten to the very thing he’d meant to “explain” about that derelict craft in the original, and I doubt at this point he’ll get another chance to do so.

While Alien Covenant is as well thought-out as Prometheus (the script is credited to John Logan and Dante Harper, from a story by Jack Paglen Michael Green) and contains a splendid double role for Michael Fassbender, it is — at least for this viewer — severely undercut by the casting of its lead. To be as blunt as possible, Katherine Waterston, daughter of the redoubtable Sam, sports one of the least appealing faces I’ve ever seen on a leading actress. Indeed, at first I thought she was a boy, and not a pretty boy either. (Did it occur to no one involved in this movie that longer hair would at least have made her look less militantly androgynous?) Call me a sexist if you wish, but in a series that has included such remarkable physiognomies as those of Sigourney Weaver, Winona Ryder and Charlize Theron, is it asking too much that the leading female at least be a woman you want to look at for two hours?


Alien (1979; 4K UHD) Seen on its original release as the anti-Star Wars, grimy and disturbing where George Lucas’ space epic was gleaming and optimistic, Alien was also one of the most extraordinary looking pictures of its time, and, although this is seldom noticed even by its many partisans, original in that its writer, Dan O’Bannon, eschewed providing information on the space-hopping characters, their relationships or their lives on earth. The crew of the Nostromo are, I suppose, types, in the same way such characters so often are in combat pictures, and their backgrounds are of less interest to the viewer than the lethal parameters of the crisis they face and how they deal with it. This gave the cast a great deal of latitude, and when you have actors as gifted and capable as Sigourney Weaver, Tom Skerritt, Yaphet Kotto, Harry Dean Stanton, Ian Holm, John Hurt and Veronica Cartwright to fill in the gaps with personality, and a director who trusts their instincts, you can get some awfully good results.


Il Conformista / The Conformist (1970) A beautiful, occasionally exhilarating, adaptation by Bernardo Bertolucci of Alberto Moravia’s novel about a sociopathic boy, his eventual and enthusiastic immersion into the Fascism of Benito Mussolini, and a mission on which his adult self is sent that complicates his beloved placidity in devastating ways. Bertolucci made a number of changes to the book, some felicitous (although his ending is not much better than Moravia’s, at least it is not as bad), others less so. Chief among these is his muddying the sexuality both of the woman with whom Marcello Clerici (Jean-Louis Trintignant) becomes fatally enamored and of Marcello himself. When as a boy he is seduced by a chauffeur in the novel, on the promise of his being given a handgun, there is no sense that Marcello is in any way homosexual, or even bisexual. For some curious reason, however, the writer-director of the movie depicts the chauffeur (Pierre Clémenti) not as a defrocked priest but a young man who, under his cap, sports a full head of long, feminine hair; when the movie’s young Marcello (Pasquale Fortunato) sees this, he responds enthusiastically. I’m not sure what is being said here, as I am also puzzled by the boy Marcello being changed in this crucial sequence from 16 to something that looks to me more like 11 or 12, or by the change of Anna (Dominique Sanda), the wife of the man Marcello is tasked with fingering for assassination, from a bitter lesbian with a yen for Marcello’s new bride Giulia (Stefania Sandrelli) to, if not a heterosexual, or even one with Sapphic tendencies, an avid potential lover for Marcello, her husband’s former student. It’s all a bit murky, made more so by the professor (Enzo Tarascio) being described (as he also is in the novel) as a hunchback when there is no suggestion of that in his physiognomy.

I don’t expect any transposition of a literary novel to retain what makes the writing special, of course. Indeed, the inability of film to replicate the written word is the chiefest argument against adaptation. What I suspect, based on Bertolucci’s reticence in other movies he’s made, to deal honestly with homosexuality — turning the homosexual Pu Yi in The Last Emperor straight, for example — prevented him from depicting Anna as Moravia did, if it did not indeed encourage him to go in exactly the opposite direction. True, he retained the lesbian dance between Anna and Giulia, but he transposed it from Parisian lesbian nightclub to an open dance-hall where it first shocks and then titillates the heterosexual dancing couples. In addition, the loss of the early material in the book describing Marcello’s childhood, his curiously detached parents and the development of his violent and conforming personality, robs the viewer of at least some explication concerning his character. I very much appreciate, however, the way Bertolucci places Marcello at the scene of the professor’s horrific murder, whose brutality is made even more terrible by Anna’s presence; the moment when, shot and hysterical, she sees him in the back of a limousine and bangs on the window in agonized confusion, is shattering. But I do not begin to comprehend why the filmmaker created a blind Fascist and closet-queen (Gastone Moschin) as Marcello’s best friend or what his presence is supposed to add to the narrative aside from a rather obvious metaphor. (The way the character describes to Marcello how other men see feels like a red herring. How does he know?)

I speak from a minority viewpoint here, and I know it. I am well aware that many regard The Conformist as one of the masterpieces of the 1970s, and I can even see why. Its contours, and the way Bertolucci weaves the narrative strands, moments from the past intruding on scenes in the present, is kinetic, and his eye is nearly unerring (the way he shoots autumn leaves blowing in the wind has influenced countless filmmakers in the years since, including Francis Coppola); the cinematography by Vittorio Storaro is sumptuous, particularly in his use of blue as a recurrent visual motif; and Georges Delerue contributed to the picture one of his characteristically plangent, lyrical scores. The cast is splendid as well, especially Trintignant, Sandrelli, Sanda and the marvelous Gastone Moschin as Marcello’s driver and Fascist counterpart. (Moschin was the memorable Don Fanucci in The Godfather Part II, spectacularly dispatched by Robert De Niro at the door of his apartment.) Nonetheless, the movie misses greatness, at least for me, and I am — just as you are, for yourself — the only audience whose opinion ultimately matters to me.


Hondo (1953) One of John Wayne’s better post-war Westerns not directed by either Howard Hawks or John Ford. Although Hondo was made in the brief flurry of Hollywood enthusiasm for the passing fad of 3D there are only a few moments in which you can tell a shot was intended to knock the 1953 audience’s socks off. (There are more such embarrassing shots in the two Three Stooges shorts made in 3D than in the entirety of Hondo.) In it, Wayne plays a character who could almost be the older edition of the character the youthful actor played in The Big Trail in 1930. Hondo Lane wasn’t raised by Indians, as Wayne’s character was in that movie, but he’s lived among them, and he understands their ways. He’s a hardened man, but essentially gentle, and decent, and you can see why the abandoned wife and mother played by Geraldine Page responds to him. He’s kinder to her, and more understanding of her, than her impatient rotter of a husband (Leo Gordon) could ever be and like Heston in Will Penny he expresses genuine, uncomplicated affection for her pleasant young son.

Page, whose first important picture this was, apparently dismayed her co-stars by going so far into her role she refused to bathe (since she reasoned a frontier woman wouldn’t be able to, at least that often). That Wayne still looks like he’s head-over-heels about her in the couple’s clinches says something about his professionalism, at the very least. However she achieved her characterization, it must be said that Page is remarkable in the picture, and got an unexpected Best Supporting Actress Oscar nomination for her work. (A line was added to the script, however, in which her character avers she knows she’s a plain woman, which can’t have been pleasant for Page to deliver although plain she certainly was, and in a time when that mattered at the movies.) Scarcely less impressive is Michael Pate as the Indian chief Vittoro, and as the boy, Lee Aaker is refreshingly free of guile. James Edward Grant based his thoughtful screenplay on a Collier’s story by Louis L’Amour and it’s everything you want from a Western script and seldom receive: Populated by interesting characters played by interesting actors, Hondo provides fulsome characterizations, good action and piquant dialogue. They really didn’t need that 3D gimmick.

John Ford, visiting a less-than-thrilled Wayne on the set, was put to work filming second unit location shots to get him out of the star’s hair, and he did extensive work on the climactic sequence, which looks it. The rest of the picture was shot by John Farrow, whom almost no one he worked with once ever cared to do so a second time. Considering the mess he made of his family I can easily believe it. Of his seven children with Maureen O’Sullivan one was a suicide, one a child molester,* and another is Mia Farrow.


*Where’s the high-profile reporting on that one, Ronan?

Text copyright 2023 by Scott Ross